Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

The BCS & the Golden Age of College Football

  • For 16 years, the BCS has given college football a true national championship game, preserved the unique color and pageantry of the bowls, and substantially improved upon—rather than detracting from—the best regular season in all of sports
  • #3 Stanford will play #5 Michigan St. in the sort of Rose Bowl matchup that will likely become far less common in the years to come—a matchup of Pac-12 and Big Ten champions
  • Five days later, in that same unparalleled setting, #1 Florida St. will meet #2 Auburn in the final game of the BCS era
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 8

Dec. 1 Rankings
Nov. 24 Rankings
Nov. 17 Rankings
Nov. 10 Rankings
Nov. 3 Rankings
Oct. 27 Rankings
Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida State
.811
13
0
.517
57
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Auburn
.806
12
1
.576
23
2-0
2-1
0
3.
Stanford
.786
11
2
.603
7
2-0
4-1
1
4.
Alabama
.784
11
1
.547
38
0-1
2-0
0
5.
Michigan State
.783
12
1
.541
41
1-0
0-1
0
6.
Baylor
.776
11
1
.536
46
0-0
2-1
0
7.
Ohio State
.774
12
1
.528
53
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Missouri
.767
11
2
.576
22
0-2
2-0
0
9.
Arizona State
.766
10
3
.626
2
0-2
4-1
0
10.
South Carolina
.758
10
2
.573
24
1-0
2-1
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Oregon
.755
10
2
.569
28
  Southeastern
.632
47
9
.420
12. Oklahoma
.751
10
2
.563
32
  Pac-12
.630
31
6
.418
13. Oklahoma State
.739
10
2
.548
36
  Big Ten
.581
37
11
.414
14. UCLA
.737
9
3
.602
8
  Atlantic Coast
.553
41
15
.411
15. Central Florida
.714
11
1
.454
80
  Big 12
.539
22
8
.397
16. Clemson
.708
10
2
.509
61
  American Athletic
.423
20
20
.423
17. USC
.701
9
4
.594
12
  Sun Belt
.408
19
21
.422
18. LSU
.692
9
3
.547
37
  Mountain West
.404
20
28
.453
19. Georgia
.691
8
4
.599
10
  Mid-American
.391
20
32
.460
20. Wisconsin
.683
9
3
.537
44
  Conference USA
.376
20
36
.460
21. Washington
.683
8
4
.589
13
  *non-conference play
22. Notre Dame
.678
8
4
.584
16
 
23. Louisville
.669
11
1
.403
109
 
24. Texas A&M
.667
8
4
.572
25
 
25. Texas
.667
8
4
.572
26
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Duke
.660
10
3
.499
64
 
76.
Tulane
.465
7
5
.416
97
27.
Miami, Fla.
.657
9
3
.507
62
 
77.
UNLV
.463
7
5
.413
100
28.
Northern Illinois
.645
12
1
.372
122
 
78.
Colorado
.463
4
8
.564
31
29.
Iowa
.641
8
4
.544
40
 
79.
San Diego State
.460
7
5
.411
102
30.
Fresno State
.639
11
1
.371
123
 
80.
San Jose State
.458
6
6
.458
77
31.
Minnesota
.637
8
4
.539
42
 
81.
Rutgers
.453
6
6
.453
81
32.
Mississippi
.636
7
5
.588
14
 
82.
Troy
.451
6
6
.451
82
33.
Arizona
.633
7
5
.585
15
 
83.
Illinois
.445
4
8
.546
39
34.
Virginia Tech
.632
8
4
.534
48
 
84.
West Virginia
.436
4
8
.537
45
35.
Michigan
.631
7
5
.583
18
 
85.
Florida Atlantic
.435
6
6
.435
90
36.
BYU
.620
8
4
.521
55
 
86.
Ohio
.432
7
5
.384
116
37.
Vanderbilt
.619
8
4
.520
56
 
87.
Wake Forest
.432
4
8
.533
49
38.
Nebraska
.615
8
4
.516
58
 
88.
South Alabama
.428
6
6
.428
94
39.
Washington State
.610
6
6
.610
4
 
89.
Arkansas
.425
3
9
.578
21
40.
Penn State
.604
7
5
.555
34
 
90.
SMU
.419
5
7
.468
72
41.
Mississippi State
.600
6
6
.600
9
 
91.
Iowa State
.411
3
9
.564
30
42.
Texas Tech
.585
7
5
.536
47
 
92.
Akron
.401
5
7
.450
84
43.
Rice
.581
10
3
.415
98
 
93.
Kansas
.399
3
9
.552
35
44.
Georgia Tech
.581
7
5
.532
50
 
94.
Colorado State
.397
7
6
.375
120
45.
Kansas State
.578
7
5
.529
52
 
95.
Texas State
.389
6
6
.389
113
46.
Utah
.576
5
7
.625
3
 
96.
Central Michigan
.383
6
6
.383
117
47.
Houston
.574
8
4
.474
68
 
97.
Nevada
.372
4
8
.471
69
48.
Oregon State
.568
6
6
.568
29
 
98.
Kentucky
.371
2
10
.579
19
49.
Tennessee
.561
5
7
.610
5
 
99.
Virginia
.371
2
10
.579
20
50.
Ball State
.561
10
2
.353
125
 
100.
California
.366
1
11
.635
1
51.
Bowling Green
.559
10
3
.393
112
 
101.
N.C. State
.361
3
9
.512
60
52.
Boston College
.553
7
5
.503
63
 
102.
Kent State
.345
4
8
.441
89
53.
Cincinnati
.542
9
3
.389
114
 
103.
Wyoming
.339
5
7
.385
115
54.
Pittsburgh
.539
6
6
.539
43
 
104.
Purdue
.336
1
11
.603
6
55.
Navy
.538
7
4
.456
79
 
105.
Memphis
.331
3
9
.479
66
56.
Indiana
.534
5
7
.583
17
 
106.
Connecticut
.324
3
9
.471
70
57.
East Carolina
.533
9
3
.381
118
 
107.
Tulsa
.320
3
9
.466
74
58.
North Carolina
.530
6
6
.530
51
 
108.
South Florida
.312
2
10
.514
59
59.
Syracuse
.528
6
6
.528
54
 
109.
New Mexico
.275
3
9
.414
99
60.
Maryland
.524
7
5
.474
67
 
110.
Army
.272
3
8
.396
111
61.
North Texas
.510
8
4
.409
103
 
111.
New Mexico State
.272
2
10
.466
75
62.
Western Kentucky
.509
8
4
.409
105
 
112.
Temple
.268
2
10
.461
76
63.
LA Lafayette
.506
8
4
.405
107
 
113.
Louisiana Tech
.268
4
8
.354
124
64.
Northwestern
.506
5
7
.556
33
 
114.
UAB
.255
2
10
.445
86
65.
Boise State
.503
8
4
.403
108
 
115.
Eastern Michigan
.248
2
10
.435
91
66.
Toledo
.500
7
5
.450
83
 
116.
Idaho
.239
1
11
.485
65
67.
Utah State
.497
8
5
.428
95
 
117.
Air Force
.229
2
10
.409
104
68.
Arkansas State
.496
7
5
.446
85
 
118.
UTEP
.227
2
10
.407
106
69.
Buffalo
.496
8
4
.396
110
 
119.
Hawaii
.227
1
11
.468
73
70.
Florida
.495
4
8
.595
11
 
120.
Western Michigan
.219
1
11
.457
78
71.
UTSA
.494
7
5
.444
87
 
121.
Massachusetts
.208
1
11
.441
88
72.
Marshall
.492
9
4
.377
119
 
122.
Southern Miss
.196
1
11
.423
96
73.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.474
8
4
.375
121
 
123.
Fla. International
.190
1
11
.413
101
74.
TCU
.470
4
8
.571
27
 
124.
Miami, Ohio
.159
0
12
.431
92
75.
LA Monroe
.469
6
6
.469
71
 
125.
Georgia State
.158
0
12
.428
93

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved