Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Florida St. Takes Over the Top Spot

  • The Seminoles' win at Clemson vaults them to #1, based on accomplishments to date—they're the only undefeated team with a win against the current top-10
  • The top teams have yet to be challenged by repeatedly playing tough opponents—among the current top-10, only #2 Alabama and #6 Stanford have more than 1 win versus the current top-25 (they have 2 apiece)
  • There is a huge gap (.114) between the top 5 conferences and the other 5 conferences, and there is also a large gap (.050) between the top 2 conferences (the SEC and Pac-12) and everyone else
  • 7 teams are currently below the Mendoza Line (.200)—an unusually high number—with 2 at .150 or below
  • With the barely over half the season done, only 10 undefeated teams remain
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 20

Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida State
.834
6
0
.556
22
1-0
0-0
0
2.
Alabama
.826
7
0
.542
30
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Missouri
.825
7
0
.541
34
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Oregon
.807
7
0
.511
48
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Ohio State
.785
7
0
.478
66
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Stanford
.774
6
1
.577
11
0-0
2-0
1
7.
Auburn
.769
6
1
.571
16
0-0
1-1
0
8.
Miami, Fla.
.761
6
0
.444
89
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Baylor
.757
6
0
.438
93
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Clemson
.755
6
1
.552
24
0-1
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Texas Tech
.753
7
0
.433
96
  Southeastern
.650
35
7
.443
12. Oklahoma
.751
6
1
.547
27
  Pac-12
.629
30
6
.421
13. Virginia Tech
.731
6
1
.521
44
  Atlantic Coast
.579
34
10
.410
14. LSU
.730
6
2
.592
8
  Big Ten
.569
36
11
.405
15. UCLA
.724
5
1
.529
38
  Big 12
.550
22
8
.408
16. Fresno State
.720
6
0
.391
119
  American Athletic
.436
19
20
.444
17. Michigan
.716
6
1
.502
50
  Sun Belt
.416
16
19
.441
18. Arizona State
.711
5
2
.593
7
  Mountain West
.411
18
23
.447
19. Northern Illinois
.711
7
0
.381
121
  Mid-American
.393
20
32
.461
20. Georgia
.706
4
3
.669
1
  Conference USA
.373
18
34
.464
21. Notre Dame
.700
5
2
.580
10
  *non-conference play
22. Texas A&M
.690
5
2
.568
17
 
23. Central Florida
.689
5
1
.486
60
 
24. South Carolina
.685
5
2
.563
18
 
25. Oklahoma State
.669
5
1
.464
71
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Oregon State
.669
6
1
.447
87
 
76.
Arkansas
.466
3
5
.541
33
27.
Mississippi
.664
4
3
.625
2
 
77.
N.C. State
.458
3
3
.458
75
28.
BYU
.663
5
2
.537
35
 
78.
Illinois
.450
3
3
.450
79
29.
Michigan State
.661
6
1
.439
92
 
79.
San Jose State
.450
3
3
.450
80
30.
Florida
.654
4
3
.614
4
 
80.
South Alabama
.450
3
3
.450
82
31.
Louisville
.645
6
1
.420
102
 
81.
Utah State
.448
4
4
.448
86
32.
Washington
.636
4
3
.595
6
 
82.
Troy
.444
4
3
.402
114
33.
Utah
.628
4
3
.587
9
 
83.
Virginia
.442
2
5
.573
15
34.
Houston
.624
5
1
.416
105
 
84.
Texas State
.438
4
3
.396
116
35.
Penn State
.622
4
2
.524
41
 
85.
Cincinnati
.432
5
2
.310
125
36.
Wisconsin
.622
5
2
.493
55
 
86.
Navy
.431
3
3
.431
99
37.
Texas
.622
4
2
.523
42
 
87.
SMU
.419
2
4
.520
45
38.
Nebraska
.620
5
1
.412
107
 
88.
San Diego State
.418
3
3
.418
104
39.
Pittsburgh
.618
4
2
.519
46
 
89.
Kansas
.416
2
4
.516
47
40.
Tennessee
.615
4
3
.574
14
 
90.
Nevada
.410
3
4
.452
76
41.
Ball State
.613
7
1
.376
122
 
91.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.398
3
4
.440
91
42.
Arizona
.604
4
2
.504
49
 
92.
Wyoming
.398
4
3
.358
123
43.
USC
.602
4
3
.560
19
 
93.
Kansas State
.397
2
4
.497
52
44.
Georgia Tech
.598
4
3
.556
23
 
94.
North Carolina
.394
1
5
.603
5
45.
Minnesota
.582
5
2
.451
77
 
95.
California
.394
1
6
.619
3
46.
Duke
.581
5
2
.450
78
 
96.
Central Michigan
.387
3
5
.461
74
47.
Maryland
.579
5
2
.448
84
 
97.
Colorado State
.381
3
4
.422
101
48.
Rice
.577
5
2
.447
88
 
98.
Army
.376
3
5
.449
83
49.
Washington State
.576
4
4
.576
12
 
99.
Kentucky
.366
1
5
.574
13
50.
Vanderbilt
.574
4
3
.532
37
 
100.
Tulsa
.353
2
4
.450
81
51.
Tulane
.564
5
2
.433
95
 
101.
Florida Atlantic
.352
2
5
.479
63
52.
Rutgers
.563
4
2
.462
72
 
102.
UTSA
.345
2
5
.471
68
53.
Ohio
.550
5
2
.420
103
 
103.
Iowa State
.341
1
5
.547
29
54.
Boston College
.550
3
3
.550
25
 
104.
Akron
.338
2
6
.487
58
55.
Mississippi State
.542
3
3
.542
31
 
105.
South Florida
.338
2
4
.433
94
56.
Iowa
.540
4
3
.497
53
 
106.
UAB
.336
2
4
.432
98
57.
East Carolina
.540
5
2
.409
109
 
107.
Purdue
.335
1
6
.557
20
58.
Boise State
.538
5
2
.407
112
 
108.
Kent State
.333
2
6
.481
62
59.
Wake Forest
.537
4
3
.494
54
 
109.
Memphis
.319
1
5
.522
43
60.
Northwestern
.531
4
3
.488
57
 
110.
Idaho
.309
1
6
.528
39
61.
Bowling Green
.524
5
2
.394
117
 
111.
New Mexico
.281
2
5
.398
115
62.
Buffalo
.522
5
2
.392
118
 
112.
Louisiana Tech
.272
2
5
.387
120
63.
North Texas
.519
4
3
.477
67
 
113.
Eastern Michigan
.268
1
6
.478
65
64.
TCU
.515
3
4
.557
21
 
114.
Temple
.262
1
6
.470
69
65.
Toledo
.513
4
3
.470
70
 
115.
Fla. International
.252
1
5
.441
90
66.
LA Lafayette
.510
4
2
.410
108
 
116.
Hawaii
.232
0
6
.548
26
67.
Indiana
.504
3
4
.547
28
 
117.
Massachusetts
.227
1
6
.424
100
68.
Marshall
.504
4
2
.404
113
 
118.
Air Force
.216
1
6
.407
111
69.
Colorado
.501
3
3
.501
51
 
119.
Western Michigan
.193
0
8
.489
56
70.
West Virginia
.499
3
4
.542
32
 
120.
New Mexico State
.188
0
7
.482
61
71.
Western Kentucky
.491
4
3
.448
85
 
121.
Southern Miss
.187
0
6
.479
64
72.
LA Monroe
.489
3
4
.532
36
 
122.
UTEP
.177
1
5
.334
124
73.
Arkansas State
.487
3
3
.487
59
 
123.
Connecticut
.176
0
6
.461
73
74.
Syracuse
.484
3
4
.527
40
 
124.
Georgia State
.150
0
7
.413
106
75.
UNLV
.475
4
3
.432
97
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.147
0
7
.408
110

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved