Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Alabama Remains #1

  • Alabama edges Florida St. by .002 to hold onto the #1 position
  • Current-#5 Auburn and current-#8 Stanford trade positions from last week; otherwise, the entire top-10 remains unchanged
  • The only undefeated teams that are ranked outside of the top-5—#18 Fresno St. and #21 Northern Illinois—have each played bottom-5 schedules
  • The SEC (.643) and Pac-12 (.621) have been by far the strongest conferences to date, followed (.045 behind) by a tie between the Big Ten and ACC (.576)
  • #49 Utah has now played the nation's toughest schedule
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 17

Nov. 10 Rankings
Nov. 3 Rankings
Oct. 27 Rankings
Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.821
10
0
.535
49
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Florida State
.819
10
0
.531
51
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Baylor
.803
9
0
.505
59
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.801
10
0
.501
62
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Auburn
.783
10
1
.552
29
0-0
3-0
1
6.
Oregon
.782
9
1
.558
25
0-1
1-0
0
7.
Missouri
.776
9
1
.549
31
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Stanford
.770
8
2
.611
6
1-0
2-1
1
9.
Clemson
.768
9
1
.537
47
0-1
1-0
0
10.
South Carolina
.759
8
2
.597
10
1-0
1-1
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Arizona State
.758
8
2
.596
11
  Southeastern
.643
42
7
.419
12. Oklahoma State
.740
9
1
.500
63
  Pac-12
.621
30
6
.413
13. UCLA
.738
8
2
.570
21
  Big Ten
.576
37
11
.409
14. Michigan State
.723
9
1
.479
71
  Atlantic Coast
.576
36
11
.412
15. Oklahoma
.717
8
2
.543
38
  Big 12
.543
22
8
.400
16. Texas A&M
.715
8
2
.542
39
  American Athletic
.433
20
20
.433
17. USC
.710
8
3
.583
15
  Sun Belt
.415
19
21
.430
18. Fresno State
.705
9
0
.374
121
  Mountain West
.414
19
26
.460
19. Wisconsin
.700
8
2
.524
55
  Mid-American
.390
20
32
.458
20. Central Florida
.700
8
1
.459
79
  Conference USA
.374
18
36
.473
21. Northern Illinois
.696
10
0
.364
122
  *non-conference play
22. Mississippi
.684
7
3
.571
20
 
23. Georgia
.684
6
4
.630
2
 
24. Notre Dame
.672
7
3
.557
26
 
25. Duke
.672
8
2
.491
66
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Minnesota
.671
8
2
.490
68
 
76.
Tulane
.474
6
4
.414
104
27.
Texas
.668
7
3
.552
28
 
77.
West Virginia
.470
4
7
.552
30
28.
LSU
.665
7
3
.549
32
 
78.
Arkansas
.469
3
7
.590
13
29.
Miami, Fla.
.657
7
3
.540
41
 
79.
San Diego State
.467
6
4
.407
108
30.
Michigan
.656
7
3
.539
44
 
80.
TCU
.465
4
7
.547
33
31.
BYU
.649
7
3
.532
50
 
81.
Western Kentucky
.464
6
4
.405
110
32.
Louisville
.649
9
1
.394
114
 
82.
Ohio
.457
6
4
.398
113
33.
Washington
.646
6
4
.589
14
 
83.
UTSA
.445
5
5
.445
89
34.
Virginia Tech
.643
7
4
.564
22
 
84.
Kansas
.441
3
7
.563
23
35.
Georgia Tech
.631
6
4
.573
18
 
85.
San Jose State
.440
5
5
.440
91
36.
Nebraska
.616
7
3
.496
65
 
86.
Texas State
.438
6
4
.380
118
37.
Texas Tech
.605
7
4
.524
54
 
87.
Troy
.433
5
6
.460
78
38.
Penn State
.605
6
4
.546
34
 
88.
Illinois
.431
3
7
.553
27
39.
Arizona
.599
6
4
.540
42
 
89.
UNLV
.429
5
5
.429
97
40.
Vanderbilt
.598
6
4
.539
43
 
90.
N.C. State
.416
3
7
.537
46
41.
Washington State
.598
5
5
.598
9
 
91.
SMU
.414
4
5
.447
86
42.
Houston
.597
7
3
.476
73
 
92.
Colorado State
.414
6
5
.388
117
43.
Oregon State
.594
6
4
.535
48
 
93.
Florida Atlantic
.408
4
6
.467
76
44.
Ball State
.589
9
2
.390
115
 
94.
Virginia
.407
2
8
.593
12
45.
LA Lafayette
.588
8
2
.402
111
 
95.
Memphis
.397
3
6
.497
64
46.
Boston College
.586
6
4
.527
52
 
96.
Nevada
.387
4
7
.468
75
47.
Kansas State
.585
6
4
.525
53
 
97.
Kentucky
.376
2
8
.561
24
48.
Iowa
.583
6
4
.524
56
 
98.
Central Michigan
.375
4
6
.433
94
49.
Utah
.580
4
6
.638
1
 
99.
Akron
.373
4
7
.453
82
50.
North Carolina
.572
5
5
.572
19
 
100.
Purdue
.355
1
9
.611
7
51.
Tennessee
.569
4
6
.627
3
 
101.
California
.355
1
10
.617
5
52.
Toledo
.568
7
3
.446
87
 
102.
Wyoming
.352
4
6
.408
106
53.
Florida
.566
4
6
.624
4
 
103.
South Alabama
.343
3
6
.439
92
54.
East Carolina
.560
8
2
.375
120
 
104.
Iowa State
.326
1
9
.579
16
55.
Rice
.553
7
3
.431
96
 
105.
South Florida
.322
2
7
.488
70
56.
Maryland
.550
6
4
.490
67
 
106.
Army
.312
3
7
.425
99
57.
Syracuse
.545
5
5
.545
35
 
107.
Louisiana Tech
.303
4
6
.356
124
58.
Boise State
.545
7
3
.423
101
 
108.
Kent State
.303
3
8
.432
95
59.
Pittsburgh
.545
5
5
.545
36
 
109.
Eastern Michigan
.287
2
8
.462
77
60.
Mississippi State
.544
4
6
.603
8
 
110.
Tulsa
.284
2
8
.457
81
61.
North Texas
.539
7
3
.418
103
 
111.
New Mexico
.281
3
7
.389
116
62.
Arkansas State
.536
6
4
.476
72
 
112.
UAB
.272
2
8
.443
90
63.
Buffalo
.534
7
3
.412
105
 
113.
Idaho
.263
1
9
.504
60
64.
Cincinnati
.530
8
2
.347
125
 
114.
New Mexico State
.261
1
9
.501
61
65.
Indiana
.517
4
6
.576
17
 
115.
Air Force
.253
2
8
.419
102
66.
Navy
.512
6
4
.452
83
 
116.
Temple
.251
1
9
.488
69
67.
Bowling Green
.495
7
3
.376
119
 
117.
UTEP
.240
2
8
.402
112
68.
Rutgers
.492
5
4
.458
80
 
118.
Massachusetts
.221
1
9
.448
85
69.
Utah State
.488
6
4
.428
98
 
119.
Western Michigan
.215
1
10
.445
88
70.
Northwestern
.484
4
6
.545
37
 
120.
Connecticut
.203
0
9
.506
57
71.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.483
6
4
.424
100
 
121.
Hawaii
.203
0
10
.505
58
72.
Colorado
.481
4
6
.542
40
 
122.
Fla. International
.195
1
9
.408
107
73.
Wake Forest
.478
4
6
.538
45
 
123.
Southern Miss
.170
0
10
.451
84
74.
Marshall
.477
7
3
.358
123
 
124.
Georgia State
.162
0
10
.436
93
75.
LA Monroe
.474
5
5
.474
74
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.145
0
10
.405
109

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved