Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Alabama Reclaims the #1 Position

  • Alabama, Florida St., and Oregon hold the top 3 spots and are separated by only .010
  • None of the current top-10 teams have yet played each other
  • Each of the top 5 conferences has a team in the top-10, with multiple teams from the SEC, Pac-12, ACC, and Big 12
  • South Carolina's dramatic double-overtime win at Missouri vaults the Gamecocks—the top-ranked 2-loss team—from #24 to #12
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 27

Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.824
8
0
.540
35
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Florida State
.820
7
0
.531
42
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Oregon
.814
8
0
.522
44
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.795
8
0
.492
57
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Miami, Fla.
.780
7
0
.470
74
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Stanford
.777
7
1
.570
15
0-0
2-0
1
7.
Oklahoma
.766
7
1
.554
21
0-0
2-0
1
8.
Auburn
.764
7
1
.550
25
0-0
1-1
0
9.
Missouri
.761
7
1
.547
29
0-0
1-1
0
10.
Baylor
.761
7
0
.442
95
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Clemson
.754
7
1
.538
36
  Southeastern
.645
38
7
.430
12. South Carolina
.724
6
2
.585
9
  Pac-12
.623
30
6
.415
13. Fresno State
.720
7
0
.391
117
  Atlantic Coast
.573
34
11
.416
14. Michigan
.718
6
1
.504
55
  Big Ten
.567
36
11
.403
15. Arizona State
.714
5
2
.596
7
  Big 12
.553
22
8
.410
16. Texas A&M
.707
6
2
.564
18
  American Athletic
.437
19
20
.444
17. Northern Illinois
.702
8
0
.371
123
  Mountain West
.416
18
25
.464
18. Texas Tech
.702
7
1
.472
70
  Sun Belt
.414
16
19
.439
19. Georgia
.699
4
3
.662
1
  Mid-American
.391
20
32
.459
20. LSU
.698
7
2
.536
38
  Conference USA
.377
18
35
.472
21. Notre Dame
.692
6
2
.548
26
  *non-conference play
22. BYU
.692
6
2
.547
28
 
23. Michigan State
.687
7
1
.455
85
 
24. Virginia Tech
.681
6
2
.534
40
 
25. UCLA
.680
5
2
.557
20
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Oklahoma State
.677
6
1
.456
83
 
76.
Colorado
.476
3
4
.518
45
27.
Central Florida
.673
6
1
.451
88
 
77.
Kansas State
.469
3
4
.512
52
28.
Texas
.672
5
2
.548
27
 
78.
N.C. State
.465
3
4
.508
54
29.
Houston
.664
6
1
.442
96
 
79.
Texas State
.464
5
3
.390
118
30.
Mississippi
.662
5
3
.591
8
 
80.
West Virginia
.461
3
5
.537
37
31.
Washington
.655
5
3
.583
10
 
81.
Western Kentucky
.456
4
4
.456
84
32.
Florida
.648
4
3
.608
3
 
82.
Utah State
.454
4
4
.454
86
33.
Arizona
.642
5
2
.514
50
 
83.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.450
4
4
.450
89
34.
USC
.638
5
3
.566
17
 
84.
Arkansas State
.448
3
4
.490
59
35.
Duke
.637
6
2
.486
61
 
85.
Marshall
.440
4
3
.399
115
36.
Louisville
.637
7
1
.400
113
 
86.
SMU
.438
3
4
.481
67
37.
Minnesota
.636
6
2
.484
65
 
87.
Cincinnati
.430
5
2
.309
125
38.
Oregon State
.635
6
2
.484
66
 
88.
Illinois
.427
3
4
.470
75
39.
Georgia Tech
.631
5
3
.558
19
 
89.
Virginia
.426
2
6
.580
12
40.
Ball State
.625
8
1
.378
120
 
90.
Kansas
.420
2
5
.551
24
41.
Wisconsin
.615
5
2
.486
64
 
91.
San Diego State
.409
3
4
.451
87
42.
Tennessee
.603
4
4
.603
5
 
92.
South Alabama
.408
3
4
.450
90
43.
Utah
.596
4
4
.596
6
 
93.
Colorado State
.400
4
4
.400
114
44.
Penn State
.595
4
3
.553
23
 
94.
Central Michigan
.392
3
5
.465
79
45.
Iowa
.592
5
3
.518
46
 
95.
UTSA
.388
3
5
.462
80
46.
Rice
.584
6
2
.431
101
 
96.
California
.380
1
7
.618
2
47.
Washington State
.576
4
4
.576
13
 
97.
Nevada
.375
3
5
.449
93
48.
Tulane
.574
6
2
.421
106
 
98.
Army
.371
3
5
.443
94
49.
Nebraska
.566
5
2
.435
98
 
99.
Wyoming
.368
4
4
.368
124
50.
Mississippi State
.558
4
3
.515
49
 
100.
Florida Atlantic
.364
2
6
.516
48
51.
LA Lafayette
.554
5
2
.423
104
 
101.
Kentucky
.357
1
6
.581
11
52.
Pittsburgh
.553
4
3
.510
53
 
102.
Iowa State
.346
1
6
.569
16
53.
East Carolina
.552
5
2
.421
105
 
103.
South Florida
.345
2
5
.471
72
54.
Toledo
.547
5
3
.471
71
 
104.
Tulsa
.343
2
5
.469
77
55.
Maryland
.546
5
3
.471
73
 
105.
Memphis
.335
1
5
.540
34
56.
Buffalo
.544
6
2
.391
116
 
106.
Purdue
.325
1
6
.547
30
57.
Vanderbilt
.544
4
4
.544
33
 
107.
Akron
.323
2
7
.488
60
58.
Ohio
.530
6
2
.378
119
 
108.
Kent State
.313
2
7
.477
68
59.
Rutgers
.529
4
3
.486
63
 
109.
Louisiana Tech
.308
3
5
.376
121
60.
North Texas
.525
5
3
.450
91
 
110.
UAB
.305
2
5
.426
103
61.
Wake Forest
.517
4
4
.517
47
 
111.
Idaho
.303
1
7
.535
39
62.
Northwestern
.514
4
4
.514
51
 
112.
New Mexico
.283
2
5
.400
112
63.
UNLV
.510
5
3
.434
99
 
113.
Eastern Michigan
.269
1
7
.493
56
64.
Boise State
.510
5
3
.434
100
 
114.
Temple
.249
1
7
.466
78
65.
Indiana
.503
3
4
.546
31
 
115.
New Mexico State
.245
1
7
.461
81
66.
Boston College
.502
3
4
.545
32
 
116.
Western Michigan
.243
1
8
.469
76
67.
Navy
.500
4
3
.457
82
 
117.
Air Force
.230
1
7
.441
97
68.
TCU
.497
3
5
.572
14
 
118.
Hawaii
.219
0
7
.529
43
69.
San Jose State
.492
4
3
.449
92
 
119.
Fla. International
.216
1
6
.408
107
70.
LA Monroe
.491
4
4
.491
58
 
120.
Massachusetts
.204
1
7
.403
110
71.
Syracuse
.488
3
4
.531
41
 
121.
UTEP
.193
1
6
.374
122
72.
Troy
.478
5
3
.404
108
 
122.
Connecticut
.191
0
7
.486
62
73.
Arkansas
.478
3
5
.553
22
 
123.
Southern Miss
.184
0
7
.475
69
74.
North Carolina
.478
2
5
.608
4
 
124.
Georgia State
.157
0
8
.428
102
75.
Bowling Green
.476
5
3
.402
111
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.144
0
8
.403
109

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved