Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Bama & FSU Keep Ping-Ponging the Top Spot

  • Over the past 5 weeks, the top spot has been held by Alabama, Florida St., Alabama, Florida St., and now Alabama again
  • Baylor's first win over a top-25 foe (current-#12 Oklahoma) vaults the Bears to #3
  • On the heels of its win over then-#2 Oregon on Thursday night, Stanford enters the top-5
  • The current top-10 is now 14-1 versus the teams currently ranked between #11 and #25
  • Tennessee has now played the nation's toughest schedule
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 10

Nov. 3 Rankings
Oct. 27 Rankings
Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.825
9
0
.542
37
0-0
3-0
0
2.
Florida State
.819
9
0
.530
48
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Baylor
.802
8
0
.502
59
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.799
9
0
.498
63
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Stanford
.788
8
1
.575
14
1-0
2-0
1
6.
Oregon
.780
8
1
.563
21
0-1
1-0
0
7.
Missouri
.777
9
1
.550
32
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Auburn
.776
9
1
.549
34
0-0
2-0
1
9.
Clemson
.758
8
1
.532
47
0-1
1-0
0
10.
South Carolina
.755
7
2
.606
6
1-0
1-1
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Arizona State
.753
7
2
.603
7
  Southeastern
.638
41
7
.415
12. Oklahoma
.722
7
2
.565
20
  Pac-12
.622
30
6
.413
13. UCLA
.720
7
2
.563
22
  Big Ten
.578
37
11
.411
14. Oklahoma State
.717
8
1
.479
67
  Atlantic Coast
.577
36
11
.413
15. Texas A&M
.709
8
2
.534
42
  Big 12
.545
22
8
.402
16. Central Florida
.708
7
1
.479
69
  American Athletic
.433
20
20
.433
17. Fresno State
.707
9
0
.376
118
  Sun Belt
.421
19
19
.421
18. Michigan State
.706
8
1
.466
77
  Mountain West
.416
19
26
.462
19. Georgia
.702
6
3
.611
4
  Mid-American
.389
20
32
.457
20. Texas
.696
7
2
.533
44
  Conference USA
.375
18
36
.474
21. Miami, Fla.
.696
7
2
.533
45
  *non-conference play
22. Wisconsin
.688
7
2
.525
50
 
23. Virginia Tech
.682
7
3
.568
18
 
24. Northern Illinois
.680
9
0
.347
123
 
25. Mississippi
.678
6
3
.584
12
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Minnesota
.677
8
2
.497
65
 
76.
Wake Forest
.476
4
6
.537
41
27.
USC
.674
7
3
.559
26
 
77.
LA Monroe
.475
5
5
.475
72
28.
Washington
.667
6
3
.571
15
 
78.
Marshall
.472
6
3
.373
119
29.
BYU
.666
6
3
.571
16
 
79.
Arkansas
.470
3
7
.591
10
30.
Notre Dame
.666
7
3
.550
33
 
80.
Texas State
.468
6
3
.369
120
31.
LSU
.665
7
3
.549
35
 
81.
Western Kentucky
.468
6
4
.408
110
32.
Georgia Tech
.656
6
3
.559
25
 
82.
San Diego State
.466
5
4
.433
96
33.
Duke
.648
7
2
.479
68
 
83.
Bowling Green
.463
6
3
.365
121
34.
Nebraska
.644
7
2
.474
73
 
84.
Colorado
.452
3
6
.553
30
35.
Michigan
.639
6
3
.541
39
 
85.
UTSA
.444
5
5
.444
90
36.
Louisville
.632
8
1
.384
117
 
86.
UNLV
.436
5
5
.436
93
37.
Houston
.630
7
2
.460
83
 
87.
Troy
.431
5
5
.431
98
38.
Arizona
.626
6
3
.527
49
 
88.
N.C. State
.423
3
6
.524
51
39.
Ball State
.621
9
1
.365
122
 
89.
Illinois
.421
3
6
.521
52
40.
Texas Tech
.618
7
3
.497
64
 
90.
Virginia
.405
2
8
.591
11
41.
Oregon State
.604
6
3
.505
57
 
91.
Florida Atlantic
.401
3
6
.501
60
42.
LA Lafayette
.598
7
2
.426
102
 
92.
Colorado State
.399
5
5
.399
113
43.
Penn State
.594
5
4
.562
23
 
93.
Kansas
.396
2
7
.567
19
44.
Utah
.591
4
5
.623
3
 
94.
SMU
.391
3
5
.465
78
45.
Vanderbilt
.588
5
4
.555
27
 
95.
Kentucky
.384
2
7
.555
28
46.
Iowa
.581
6
4
.521
53
 
96.
Wyoming
.374
4
5
.405
111
47.
Florida
.579
4
5
.611
5
 
97.
California
.367
1
9
.623
2
48.
Pittsburgh
.576
5
4
.543
36
 
98.
South Alabama
.361
3
5
.434
95
49.
Buffalo
.574
7
2
.402
112
 
99.
Central Michigan
.357
3
6
.455
85
50.
Tennessee
.569
4
6
.627
1
 
100.
Memphis
.354
2
6
.504
58
51.
Boston College
.567
5
4
.534
43
 
101.
Akron
.353
3
7
.471
74
52.
Kansas State
.566
5
4
.533
46
 
102.
Purdue
.353
1
8
.600
8
53.
Washington State
.561
4
5
.594
9
 
103.
Nevada
.350
3
7
.468
75
54.
East Carolina
.561
7
2
.389
116
 
104.
South Florida
.342
2
6
.491
66
55.
Syracuse
.549
5
4
.515
54
 
105.
Iowa State
.317
1
8
.561
24
56.
North Carolina
.547
4
5
.580
13
 
106.
Army
.315
3
7
.429
100
57.
Rice
.543
6
3
.441
91
 
107.
Louisiana Tech
.308
4
5
.337
124
58.
North Texas
.541
7
3
.420
106
 
108.
New Mexico
.303
3
6
.394
115
59.
Toledo
.541
6
3
.440
92
 
109.
Eastern Michigan
.293
2
8
.468
76
60.
Mississippi State
.535
4
5
.568
17
 
110.
Tulsa
.291
2
7
.451
88
61.
Boise State
.531
6
3
.430
99
 
111.
Kent State
.287
2
8
.461
82
62.
Rutgers
.528
5
3
.453
87
 
112.
UAB
.277
2
7
.434
94
63.
Indiana
.519
4
5
.552
31
 
113.
Idaho
.260
1
9
.500
61
64.
Arkansas State
.512
5
4
.479
70
 
114.
New Mexico State
.259
1
9
.499
62
65.
Maryland
.510
5
4
.476
71
 
115.
Air Force
.253
2
8
.419
107
66.
Northwestern
.505
4
5
.538
40
 
116.
Temple
.238
1
8
.462
80
67.
Ohio
.498
6
3
.398
114
 
117.
Massachusetts
.229
1
8
.450
89
68.
Navy
.495
5
4
.462
81
 
118.
Western Michigan
.228
1
9
.457
84
69.
Cincinnati
.495
7
2
.329
125
 
119.
Fla. International
.209
1
8
.421
104
70.
West Virginia
.494
4
6
.554
29
 
120.
UTEP
.209
1
8
.421
105
71.
Utah State
.493
6
4
.433
97
 
121.
Connecticut
.205
0
8
.508
55
72.
San Jose State
.487
5
4
.454
86
 
122.
Hawaii
.203
0
9
.505
56
73.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.483
6
4
.423
103
 
123.
Southern Miss
.177
0
9
.463
79
74.
TCU
.481
4
6
.541
38
 
124.
Georgia State
.157
0
9
.428
101
75.
Tulane
.477
6
4
.418
108
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.148
0
9
.411
109

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved