Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

For the 4th-Straight Week, the #1 Team Changes

  • Florida St.'s win over now-#13 Miami moves the Seminoles back into the top spot, while Oregon and Alabama round out the top-3
  • There are at least .020-point gaps on either side of #4 Ohio St.
  • The Tigers of #5 Missouri, #9 Auburn, and #10 Clemson all lie within .008 of each other
  • #7 Oklahoma and #10 Clemson are separated by just .001
  • Left for dead earlier this season, the Texas Longhorns crack the top-25
  • There are as many independents (#15 Notre Dame and #19 BYU) as Big Ten teams (#4 Ohio St. and #16 Michigan St.) in the top-25
  • #14 Georgia, which has gone 5-3 versus by far the nation's toughest schedule, has accomplished more to date than 25 teams that have fewer losses than the Bulldogs have
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 3

Oct. 27 Rankings
Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida State
.827
8
0
.544
30
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Oregon
.817
8
0
.528
43
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Alabama
.813
8
0
.521
47
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.793
9
0
.489
63
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Missouri
.771
8
1
.551
27
0-0
1-1
0
6.
Stanford
.770
7
1
.559
21
0-0
2-0
1
7.
Oklahoma
.764
7
1
.552
26
0-0
1-1
0
8.
Baylor
.764
7
0
.448
88
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Auburn
.764
8
1
.541
32
0-0
1-1
0
10.
Clemson
.763
8
1
.539
35
0-1
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. South Carolina
.749
7
2
.598
7
  Southeastern
.638
40
7
.418
12. Arizona State
.741
6
2
.607
5
  Pac-12
.626
30
6
.418
13. Miami, Fla.
.740
7
1
.518
50
  Atlantic Coast
.572
34
11
.415
14. Georgia
.729
5
3
.665
1
  Big Ten
.569
36
11
.405
15. Notre Dame
.717
7
2
.558
22
  Big 12
.550
22
8
.408
16. Michigan State
.716
8
1
.478
71
  American Athletic
.437
19
20
.444
17. Fresno State
.715
8
0
.385
117
  Mountain West
.422
19
25
.462
18. Oklahoma State
.713
7
1
.485
67
  Sun Belt
.419
18
19
.427
19. BYU
.704
6
2
.561
20
  Mid-American
.389
20
32
.457
20. UCLA
.701
6
2
.558
23
  Conference USA
.376
18
36
.475
21. LSU
.689
7
2
.526
45
  *non-conference play
22. Northern Illinois
.685
9
0
.353
124
 
23. Texas A&M
.685
7
2
.521
48
 
24. Central Florida
.681
6
1
.460
81
 
25. Texas
.679
6
2
.532
38
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Michigan
.677
6
2
.531
40
 
76.
Arkansas
.476
3
6
.576
15
27.
USC
.673
6
3
.579
14
 
77.
Arkansas State
.475
4
4
.475
72
28.
Houston
.668
7
1
.432
100
 
78.
UNLV
.473
5
4
.440
94
29.
Texas Tech
.661
7
2
.494
62
 
79.
TCU
.469
3
6
.570
16
30.
Mississippi
.659
5
3
.588
12
 
80.
Bowling Green
.465
5
3
.391
115
31.
Washington
.659
5
3
.588
13
 
81.
Cincinnati
.465
6
2
.319
125
32.
Minnesota
.656
7
2
.488
64
 
82.
Colorado
.464
3
5
.539
36
33.
Arizona
.656
6
2
.507
56
 
83.
Western Kentucky
.454
5
4
.421
104
34.
Wisconsin
.656
6
2
.506
57
 
84.
Marshall
.454
5
3
.380
120
35.
Georgia Tech
.650
6
3
.553
25
 
85.
Troy
.445
5
4
.413
108
36.
Louisville
.641
7
1
.404
111
 
86.
N.C. State
.434
3
5
.509
54
37.
Virginia Tech
.637
6
3
.539
34
 
87.
San Diego State
.429
4
4
.429
101
38.
Duke
.626
6
2
.474
73
 
88.
Illinois
.427
3
5
.502
59
39.
Florida
.623
4
4
.623
2
 
89.
SMU
.426
3
4
.469
78
40.
Ball State
.619
8
1
.371
122
 
90.
Virginia
.425
2
7
.597
9
41.
Penn State
.614
5
3
.540
33
 
91.
UTSA
.411
4
5
.444
92
42.
Nebraska
.605
6
2
.452
84
 
92.
Florida Atlantic
.408
3
6
.508
55
43.
Utah
.604
4
4
.604
6
 
93.
Kansas
.401
2
6
.554
24
44.
Oregon State
.603
6
3
.504
58
 
94.
Nevada
.383
3
6
.482
68
45.
Tennessee
.586
4
5
.618
3
 
95.
Kentucky
.380
2
6
.533
37
46.
LA Lafayette
.567
6
2
.414
107
 
96.
Central Michigan
.378
3
5
.451
85
47.
Washington State
.566
4
5
.598
8
 
97.
Colorado State
.377
4
5
.409
110
48.
Boston College
.562
4
4
.562
18
 
98.
Wyoming
.377
4
4
.377
121
49.
Iowa
.562
5
4
.529
41
 
99.
California
.370
1
8
.618
4
50.
North Texas
.557
6
3
.456
83
 
100.
South Alabama
.364
3
5
.437
97
51.
East Carolina
.553
6
2
.399
113
 
101.
Purdue
.354
1
7
.591
11
52.
Vanderbilt
.550
4
4
.550
28
 
102.
Akron
.352
3
7
.469
77
53.
Mississippi State
.548
4
4
.548
29
 
103.
South Florida
.347
2
6
.497
60
54.
Maryland
.547
5
3
.471
76
 
104.
Army
.329
3
6
.423
103
55.
Toledo
.547
6
3
.446
89
 
105.
Iowa State
.327
1
7
.561
19
56.
Rice
.541
6
3
.440
93
 
106.
Memphis
.310
1
6
.529
42
57.
Buffalo
.540
6
2
.387
116
 
107.
Tulsa
.304
2
6
.448
87
58.
Boise State
.538
6
3
.437
96
 
108.
Louisiana Tech
.294
3
5
.360
123
59.
Ohio
.536
6
2
.383
118
 
109.
Idaho
.292
1
8
.531
39
60.
Rutgers
.534
5
3
.459
82
 
110.
UAB
.288
2
6
.429
102
61.
San Jose State
.524
5
3
.449
86
 
111.
Kent State
.287
2
8
.461
80
62.
Syracuse
.521
4
4
.521
46
 
112.
Air Force
.280
2
7
.438
95
63.
North Carolina
.519
3
5
.594
10
 
113.
New Mexico
.265
2
6
.401
112
64.
Tulane
.518
6
3
.417
106
 
114.
Eastern Michigan
.262
1
8
.494
61
65.
Pittsburgh
.517
4
4
.517
51
 
115.
New Mexico State
.246
1
8
.473
74
66.
Kansas State
.512
4
4
.512
53
 
116.
Temple
.246
1
8
.472
75
67.
LA Monroe
.511
5
4
.478
70
 
117.
Western Michigan
.241
1
8
.466
79
68.
West Virginia
.509
4
5
.542
31
 
118.
Massachusetts
.218
1
8
.434
99
69.
Northwestern
.494
4
5
.528
44
 
119.
Fla. International
.215
1
7
.419
105
70.
Indiana
.488
3
5
.564
17
 
120.
Hawaii
.213
0
8
.520
49
71.
Navy
.486
4
4
.486
66
 
121.
UTEP
.200
1
7
.397
114
72.
Wake Forest
.484
4
5
.517
52
 
122.
Connecticut
.191
0
7
.486
65
73.
Texas State
.480
6
3
.381
119
 
123.
Southern Miss
.188
0
8
.481
69
74.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.478
5
4
.445
90
 
124.
Georgia State
.161
0
9
.434
98
75.
Utah State
.478
5
4
.444
91
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.148
0
8
.411
109

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved