Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

The Top-5 Remains Unchanged

  • The top 5 teams are now separated by only .014
  • The SEC moves slightly ahead of the Pac-12 for the top spot in the conference rankings—those have been by far the top 2 conferences to date
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 6

Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.834
5
0
.557
15
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Clemson
.828
5
0
.547
19
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Florida State
.827
5
0
.545
20
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Stanford
.826
5
0
.542
21
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Oklahoma
.820
5
0
.533
29
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Georgia
.799
4
1
.651
1
0-1
2-0
0
7.
UCLA
.796
4
0
.493
51
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Ohio State
.782
6
0
.473
62
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Miami, Fla.
.782
5
0
.472
63
0-0
1-0
0
10.
Oregon
.781
5
0
.471
64
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Missouri
.770
5
0
.455
74
  Southeastern
.643
33
7
.441
12. Baylor
.765
4
0
.448
76
  Pac-12
.638
29
5
.416
13. Michigan
.762
5
0
.444
78
  Atlantic Coast
.591
32
9
.417
14. Auburn
.762
4
1
.600
3
  Big Ten
.567
36
11
.403
15. LSU
.749
5
1
.561
12
  Big 12
.541
22
8
.399
16. Texas Tech
.747
5
0
.425
101
  American Athletic
.441
18
19
.449
17. South Carolina
.733
4
1
.564
9
  Mountain West
.417
18
23
.453
18. Florida
.726
4
1
.555
16
  Mid-American
.398
19
29
.460
19. Virginia Tech
.721
5
1
.526
31
  Sun Belt
.394
14
19
.439
20. Northern Illinois
.714
5
0
.384
118
  Conference USA
.380
17
34
.479
21. Fresno State
.711
5
0
.380
119
   
 
22. Washington
.710
4
1
.536
26
  *non-conference play
23. Houston
.706
4
0
.374
121
 
24. Pittsburgh
.702
3
1
.559
13
 
25. Louisville
.694
5
0
.362
123
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Texas A&M
.689
4
1
.510
40
 
76.
Vanderbilt
.473
3
3
.473
61
27.
Notre Dame
.651
4
2
.555
17
 
77.
Kansas
.467
2
2
.467
65
28.
Central Florida
.651
4
1
.467
66
 
78.
Toledo
.467
3
3
.467
67
29.
Arizona
.637
3
1
.485
53
 
79.
LA Lafayette
.460
3
2
.401
115
30.
Ohio
.635
4
1
.450
75
 
80.
Nevada
.458
3
3
.458
73
31.
Washington State
.633
4
2
.534
27
 
81.
Syracuse
.458
2
3
.518
33
32.
Ball State
.629
5
1
.421
102
 
82.
Wyoming
.454
3
2
.396
117
33.
Nebraska
.625
4
1
.439
86
 
83.
Arkansas State
.443
2
3
.503
46
34.
Oklahoma State
.622
4
1
.437
88
 
84.
Utah State
.436
3
3
.436
90
35.
Mississippi
.622
3
2
.563
11
 
85.
LA Monroe
.436
2
4
.537
24
36.
Northwestern
.621
4
1
.436
91
 
86.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.434
3
3
.434
93
37.
East Carolina
.621
4
1
.435
92
 
87.
North Carolina
.420
1
4
.606
2
38.
Maryland
.620
4
1
.434
94
 
88.
California
.409
1
4
.595
4
39.
Rutgers
.618
4
1
.432
95
 
89.
Army
.405
2
4
.505
44
40.
Arizona State
.616
3
2
.558
14
 
90.
Troy
.404
3
3
.404
112
41.
Oregon State
.595
4
1
.409
110
 
91.
San Jose State
.403
2
3
.462
71
42.
Georgia Tech
.593
3
2
.534
28
 
92.
Florida Atlantic
.395
2
4
.495
50
43.
Michigan State
.586
4
1
.400
116
 
93.
San Diego State
.388
2
3
.446
77
44.
Utah
.582
3
2
.522
32
 
94.
UTSA
.384
2
4
.483
56
45.
Bowling Green
.576
5
1
.368
122
 
95.
Kentucky
.381
1
4
.566
7
46.
USC
.574
3
2
.514
35
 
96.
Cincinnati
.380
3
2
.325
125
47.
Tennessee
.572
3
3
.572
5
 
97.
South Alabama
.378
2
3
.436
89
48.
Penn State
.571
3
2
.512
38
 
98.
Kent State
.375
2
4
.474
60
49.
Rice
.568
3
2
.508
41
 
99.
Colorado State
.374
2
3
.432
96
50.
Indiana
.567
3
2
.507
42
 
100.
New Mexico
.370
2
3
.427
99
51.
Boston College
.563
3
2
.503
47
 
101.
SMU
.364
1
4
.549
18
52.
BYU
.562
3
2
.502
48
 
102.
Memphis
.356
1
3
.506
43
53.
Navy
.560
3
1
.406
111
 
103.
Central Michigan
.345
2
4
.442
83
54.
Minnesota
.545
4
2
.444
79
 
104.
Kansas State
.345
2
3
.402
114
55.
Western Kentucky
.543
4
2
.442
82
 
105.
Tulsa
.332
1
4
.513
37
56.
Buffalo
.524
3
2
.464
69
 
106.
Idaho
.331
1
5
.536
25
57.
Iowa
.521
4
2
.421
103
 
107.
Akron
.325
1
5
.529
30
58.
Duke
.520
3
2
.460
72
 
108.
Purdue
.313
1
4
.492
52
59.
West Virginia
.514
3
3
.514
36
 
109.
Eastern Michigan
.306
1
4
.484
55
60.
Tulane
.511
4
2
.411
109
 
110.
Louisiana Tech
.290
2
4
.380
120
61.
TCU
.510
2
3
.569
6
 
111.
Fla. International
.290
1
4
.464
68
62.
Virginia
.505
2
3
.565
8
 
112.
South Florida
.288
1
4
.462
70
63.
Wake Forest
.505
3
3
.505
45
 
113.
Iowa State
.279
1
3
.418
105
64.
North Texas
.504
2
3
.564
10
 
114.
UAB
.272
1
4
.442
81
65.
Marshall
.502
3
2
.442
80
 
115.
Air Force
.242
1
5
.427
100
66.
Wisconsin
.500
3
2
.440
84
 
116.
Hawaii
.225
0
5
.537
23
67.
N.C. State
.500
3
2
.440
85
 
117.
Connecticut
.210
0
4
.516
34
68.
Illinois
.492
3
2
.432
97
 
118.
Temple
.207
0
5
.510
39
69.
Texas
.490
3
2
.430
98
 
119.
UTEP
.205
1
4
.354
124
70.
Colorado
.485
2
2
.485
54
 
120.
Southern Miss
.199
0
5
.499
49
71.
Mississippi State
.481
2
3
.541
22
 
121.
Western Michigan
.185
0
6
.477
58
72.
Boise State
.480
3
2
.421
104
 
122.
New Mexico State
.184
0
6
.475
59
73.
Arkansas
.478
3
3
.478
57
 
123.
Miami, Ohio
.163
0
5
.437
87
74.
UNLV
.476
3
2
.417
107
 
124.
Massachusetts
.152
0
5
.418
106
75.
Texas State
.474
3
2
.414
108
 
125.
Georgia State
.144
0
5
.403
113

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved