Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

#1 Last Season, Alabama Is #1 Again

  • The Pac-12 has been the top conference to date and has 4 teams in the top-10
  • Georgia has played the nation's toughest schedule and has earned a top-10 ranking based on results to date, despite a loss (at #2 Clemson)
  • Georgia State (0-4 vs. the nation's easiest schedule to date) has posted what is almost certainly the lowest rating (.097) in the history of the rankings
  • The #125 Panthers travel to #1 Alabama this week
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Sept. 29

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.869
4
0
.623
2
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Clemson
.834
4
0
.556
12
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Florida State
.830
4
0
.550
13
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Stanford
.809
4
0
.514
32
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Oklahoma
.807
4
0
.511
35
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Georgia
.801
3
1
.684
1
0-1
2-0
0
7.
Washington
.794
4
0
.490
45
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Oregon
.782
4
0
.472
59
0-0
0-0
0
9.
UCLA
.758
3
0
.438
82
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Texas Tech
.756
4
0
.436
84
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. South Carolina
.744
3
1
.610
3
  Pac-12
.656
29
4
.417
12. Missouri
.741
4
0
.417
94
  Southeastern
.647
32
7
.449
13. Ohio State
.741
5
0
.417
95
  Atlantic Coast
.590
31
8
.407
14. LSU
.737
4
1
.568
9
  Big Ten
.572
36
11
.408
15. Fresno State
.735
4
0
.409
103
  Big 12
.547
22
8
.405
16. Baylor
.730
3
0
.404
107
  American Athletic
.437
18
19
.445
17. Michigan
.722
4
0
.394
111
  Mountain West
.425
16
21
.465
18. Northern Illinois
.722
4
0
.393
112
  Mid-American
.390
18
29
.459
19. Louisville
.715
4
0
.386
114
  Sun Belt
.388
14
18
.424
20. Auburn
.713
3
1
.573
7
  Conference USA
.384
17
34
.483
21. Virginia Tech
.710
4
1
.535
20
   
 
22. Pittsburgh
.706
3
1
.564
10
  *non-conference play
23. Houston
.703
4
0
.372
116
 
24. Northwestern
.703
4
0
.372
117
 
25. Texas A&M
.702
4
1
.525
23
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Florida
.685
3
1
.539
15
 
76.
Kansas
.469
2
1
.370
118
27.
Miami, Fla.
.684
4
0
.351
121
 
77.
Texas
.466
2
2
.466
65
28.
Arizona State
.678
3
1
.531
21
 
78.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.466
3
2
.406
105
29.
Mississippi
.668
3
1
.520
28
 
79.
Tulane
.465
3
2
.406
106
30.
Maryland
.668
4
0
.334
122
 
80.
Wyoming
.458
3
2
.399
109
31.
Arizona
.656
3
1
.506
36
 
81.
Marshall
.456
2
2
.456
69
32.
Georgia Tech
.650
3
1
.500
39
 
82.
LA Monroe
.456
2
3
.516
30
33.
Central Florida
.648
3
1
.498
41
 
83.
Michigan State
.453
3
1
.309
124
34.
Penn State
.641
3
1
.490
46
 
84.
South Alabama
.441
2
2
.441
80
35.
Ohio
.628
3
1
.476
56
 
85.
Wake Forest
.439
2
3
.499
40
36.
Utah
.619
3
1
.466
64
 
86.
Toledo
.433
2
3
.493
42
37.
Oklahoma State
.609
3
1
.456
70
 
87.
California
.432
1
3
.585
6
38.
Rutgers
.603
3
1
.450
75
 
88.
UTSA
.429
2
3
.489
48
39.
East Carolina
.599
3
1
.445
78
 
89.
Arkansas State
.423
2
3
.483
52
40.
Oregon State
.598
4
1
.411
98
 
90.
North Carolina
.418
1
3
.571
8
41.
USC
.596
3
2
.537
18
 
91.
Army
.404
2
3
.463
68
42.
Iowa
.596
4
1
.410
99
 
92.
Colorado State
.396
2
3
.455
71
43.
Ball State
.595
4
1
.409
102
 
93.
Kent State
.396
2
3
.455
72
44.
Washington State
.595
3
2
.535
19
 
94.
SMU
.386
1
3
.539
16
45.
North Texas
.591
2
2
.591
5
 
95.
Kentucky
.377
1
3
.529
22
46.
Illinois
.588
3
1
.435
85
 
96.
Memphis
.370
1
2
.469
62
47.
Minnesota
.585
4
1
.399
108
 
97.
San Jose State
.369
1
3
.520
27
48.
Tennessee
.582
3
2
.523
26
 
98.
Tulsa
.364
1
3
.516
31
49.
Nebraska
.579
3
1
.425
88
 
99.
LA Lafayette
.361
2
2
.361
119
50.
Bowling Green
.577
4
1
.391
113
 
100.
Troy
.357
2
3
.414
97
51.
Texas State
.577
3
1
.423
89
 
101.
Eastern Michigan
.344
1
3
.493
43
52.
N.C. State
.568
3
1
.414
96
 
102.
New Mexico
.338
1
3
.486
49
53.
Virginia
.560
2
2
.560
11
 
103.
Purdue
.331
1
4
.513
33
54.
Notre Dame
.550
3
2
.490
47
 
104.
Idaho
.330
1
4
.511
34
55.
Nevada
.530
3
2
.469
61
 
105.
Iowa State
.325
1
2
.420
91
56.
West Virginia
.525
3
2
.465
66
 
106.
Kansas State
.325
2
2
.325
123
57.
Duke
.524
3
2
.464
67
 
107.
Akron
.306
1
4
.484
51
58.
TCU
.523
2
2
.523
24
 
108.
Central Michigan
.303
1
4
.480
53
59.
BYU
.523
2
2
.523
25
 
109.
UAB
.302
1
3
.446
77
60.
Navy
.523
2
1
.422
90
 
110.
Florida Atlantic
.301
1
4
.478
54
61.
Rice
.517
2
2
.517
29
 
111.
San Diego State
.300
1
3
.443
79
62.
Boise State
.510
3
2
.450
74
 
112.
Hawaii
.270
0
4
.597
4
63.
Cincinnati
.509
3
1
.359
120
 
113.
Air Force
.262
1
4
.430
87
64.
Colorado
.509
2
1
.409
101
 
114.
Louisiana Tech
.245
1
4
.408
104
65.
Wisconsin
.508
3
2
.448
76
 
115.
UTEP
.244
1
3
.375
115
66.
Boston College
.501
2
2
.501
38
 
116.
Southern Miss
.233
0
4
.548
14
67.
Western Kentucky
.500
3
2
.440
81
 
117.
Fla. International
.225
0
4
.537
17
68.
Vanderbilt
.496
3
2
.436
83
 
118.
Connecticut
.202
0
4
.503
37
69.
Arkansas
.492
3
2
.432
86
 
119.
Miami, Ohio
.195
0
4
.492
44
70.
Indiana
.485
2
2
.485
50
 
120.
New Mexico State
.186
0
5
.478
55
71.
UNLV
.478
3
2
.418
92
 
121.
Western Michigan
.180
0
5
.467
63
72.
Utah State
.478
3
2
.418
93
 
122.
Temple
.172
0
4
.455
73
73.
Buffalo
.475
2
2
.475
57
 
123.
South Florida
.147
0
4
.409
100
74.
Syracuse
.475
2
2
.475
58
 
124.
Massachusetts
.141
0
4
.397
110
75.
Mississippi State
.472
2
2
.472
60
 
125.
Georgia State
.097
0
4
.301
125

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved