Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Missouri, UCLA, & Oregon Crack the Top-5

  • Missouri vaults from #11 to #2 after winning at Georgia, while Alabama remains #1
  • Half of the top-30 teams are from either the SEC (8 teams) or Pac-12 (7 teams)
  • #9 Georgia, which has already played 4 current top-15 teams (going 2-2), has faced by far the nation's toughest schedule to date
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 13

Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.836
6
0
.560
16
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Missouri
.828
6
0
.547
22
1-0
0-0
0
3.
UCLA
.822
5
0
.536
28
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Clemson
.818
6
0
.528
36
1-0
0-0
0
5.
Oregon
.812
6
0
.519
41
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Florida State
.805
5
0
.508
46
0-0
0-0
0
7.
LSU
.776
6
1
.580
8
0-1
2-0
0
8.
Ohio State
.776
6
0
.463
75
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Georgia
.767
4
2
.687
1
1-2
1-0
0
10.
Baylor
.765
5
0
.448
80
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Stanford
.763
5
1
.580
9
  Southeastern
.647
35
7
.440
12. Miami, Fla.
.756
5
0
.436
88
  Pac-12
.637
29
5
.416
13. Oklahoma
.743
5
1
.553
19
  Atlantic Coast
.589
33
10
.424
14. Auburn
.740
5
1
.549
21
  Big Ten
.569
36
11
.405
15. South Carolina
.738
5
1
.547
23
  Big 12
.545
22
8
.403
16. Texas Tech
.731
6
0
.405
112
  American Athletic
.435
18
19
.443
17. Virginia Tech
.729
6
1
.518
43
  Mountain West
.413
18
23
.449
18. Texas A&M
.722
5
1
.527
37
  Sun Belt
.406
15
19
.440
19. Louisville
.709
6
0
.379
118
  Mid-American
.392
19
31
.463
20. Fresno State
.707
5
0
.376
119
  Conference USA
.374
17
34
.472
21. Northern Illinois
.706
6
0
.375
121
  *non-conference play
22. Houston
.704
5
0
.372
122
 
23. Florida
.679
4
2
.585
6
 
24. Utah
.676
4
2
.582
7
 
25. Michigan
.674
5
1
.469
73
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Central Florida
.661
4
1
.478
65
 
76.
Toledo
.476
3
3
.476
67
27.
Oregon State
.661
5
1
.455
79
 
77.
Colorado
.475
2
3
.535
29
28.
Arizona State
.660
4
2
.564
13
 
78.
N.C. State
.470
3
3
.470
72
29.
Washington
.658
4
2
.562
14
 
79.
Wyoming
.463
4
2
.365
123
30.
Notre Dame
.650
4
2
.553
18
 
80.
Arkansas
.462
3
4
.504
48
31.
Michigan State
.643
5
1
.436
89
 
81.
Nevada
.456
3
3
.456
77
32.
Pittsburgh
.643
3
2
.586
5
 
82.
LA Lafayette
.446
3
2
.388
116
33.
Maryland
.641
5
1
.433
92
 
83.
Troy
.435
4
3
.393
115
34.
Nebraska
.640
5
1
.432
94
 
84.
San Jose State
.432
3
3
.432
93
35.
Ball State
.636
6
1
.412
107
 
85.
Army
.429
3
4
.471
70
36.
Oklahoma State
.630
4
1
.445
82
 
86.
Utah State
.428
3
4
.470
71
37.
Penn State
.629
4
2
.530
34
 
87.
Texas State
.427
3
3
.427
100
38.
USC
.625
4
2
.526
38
 
88.
Kansas
.425
2
3
.485
59
39.
BYU
.624
4
2
.525
39
 
89.
San Diego State
.424
3
3
.424
102
40.
Texas
.600
4
2
.500
49
 
90.
California
.415
1
5
.623
2
41.
Mississippi
.595
3
3
.595
4
 
91.
Cincinnati
.410
4
2
.317
125
42.
Rice
.592
4
2
.492
53
 
92.
South Alabama
.396
2
3
.455
78
43.
Washington State
.585
4
3
.543
26
 
93.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.396
3
4
.438
87
44.
Wisconsin
.581
4
2
.480
62
 
94.
North Carolina
.392
1
4
.578
10
45.
Northwestern
.573
4
2
.472
69
 
95.
Kentucky
.392
1
5
.600
3
46.
Tulane
.571
5
2
.440
85
 
96.
Central Michigan
.390
3
4
.432
95
47.
Rutgers
.567
4
2
.466
74
 
97.
Kansas State
.379
2
4
.478
66
48.
Tennessee
.565
3
3
.565
12
 
98.
SMU
.372
1
4
.557
17
49.
Boston College
.560
3
3
.560
15
 
99.
Kent State
.369
2
5
.498
50
50.
Duke
.560
4
2
.459
76
 
100.
Florida Atlantic
.357
2
5
.485
58
51.
Georgia Tech
.547
3
3
.547
24
 
101.
UTSA
.353
2
5
.480
63
52.
Arizona
.545
3
2
.485
57
 
102.
Memphis
.350
1
4
.533
30
53.
TCU
.544
3
3
.544
25
 
103.
Tulsa
.347
2
4
.443
83
54.
Ohio
.541
4
2
.440
84
 
104.
South Florida
.335
2
4
.430
97
55.
Western Kentucky
.541
4
2
.440
86
 
105.
UAB
.335
2
4
.430
98
56.
Mississippi State
.539
3
3
.539
27
 
106.
Purdue
.329
1
5
.533
31
57.
Iowa
.536
4
2
.435
90
 
107.
Colorado State
.322
2
4
.416
105
58.
East Carolina
.536
4
2
.435
91
 
108.
Iowa State
.318
1
4
.497
51
59.
Indiana
.533
3
3
.533
32
 
109.
New Mexico
.312
2
4
.405
110
60.
Syracuse
.532
3
3
.532
33
 
110.
Idaho
.305
1
6
.523
40
61.
Minnesota
.531
4
2
.431
96
 
111.
Akron
.298
1
6
.515
44
62.
Bowling Green
.526
5
2
.396
114
 
112.
Eastern Michigan
.288
1
5
.486
56
63.
North Texas
.519
3
3
.519
42
 
113.
Louisiana Tech
.286
2
4
.376
120
64.
Buffalo
.513
4
2
.413
106
 
114.
Fla. International
.257
1
5
.447
81
65.
West Virginia
.511
3
3
.511
45
 
115.
Hawaii
.236
0
6
.553
20
66.
Boise State
.508
4
2
.407
108
 
116.
Air Force
.229
1
6
.426
101
67.
Marshall
.506
4
2
.406
109
 
117.
Massachusetts
.220
1
5
.397
113
68.
Wake Forest
.506
3
3
.506
47
 
118.
Temple
.194
0
6
.490
54
69.
Vanderbilt
.494
3
3
.494
52
 
119.
Western Michigan
.190
0
7
.484
60
70.
Illinois
.487
3
2
.427
99
 
120.
Southern Miss
.188
0
5
.481
61
71.
Arkansas State
.486
3
3
.486
55
 
121.
New Mexico State
.187
0
6
.480
64
72.
LA Monroe
.486
3
4
.529
35
 
122.
Connecticut
.183
0
5
.473
68
73.
UNLV
.485
4
2
.385
117
 
123.
UTEP
.176
1
5
.333
124
74.
Navy
.481
3
2
.421
103
 
124.
Miami, Ohio
.153
0
6
.420
104
75.
Virginia
.476
2
4
.577
11
 
125.
Georgia State
.145
0
6
.405
111

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved