Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

FSU Moves to #1 for the 3rd Time This Season

  • A week before Alabama travels to #5 Auburn, #1 Florida St. edges the #2 Crimson Tide by .003
  • Following non-FBS Georgia Southern's win at Florida, the SEC's lead over the Pac-12 for the top spot in the conference rankings drops from .022 last week to just .003 this week
  • 12 of the top-25 teams are from one of those two conferences
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 24

Nov. 17 Rankings
Nov. 10 Rankings
Nov. 3 Rankings
Oct. 27 Rankings
Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida State
.812
11
0
.519
56
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Alabama
.809
11
0
.514
59
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Ohio State
.803
11
0
.505
61
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Missouri
.782
10
1
.550
34
0-0
1-1
0
5.
Auburn
.778
10
1
.545
40
0-0
2-1
0
6.
Arizona State
.777
9
2
.610
5
0-1
3-1
0
7.
Oklahoma State
.769
10
1
.532
50
1-0
0-0
1
8.
Stanford
.766
9
2
.594
9
1-0
2-1
1
9.
Baylor
.762
9
1
.530
51
0-1
1-0
0
10.
Northern Illinois
.749
11
0
.427
95
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Oregon
.745
9
2
.567
20
  Southeastern
.625
44
8
.408
12. Clemson
.744
10
1
.498
62
  Pac-12
.622
30
6
.414
13. South Carolina
.739
9
2
.559
27
  Big Ten
.580
37
11
.413
14. Michigan State
.735
10
1
.486
69
  Atlantic Coast
.563
40
12
.397
15. Oklahoma
.730
9
2
.547
37
  Big 12
.543
22
8
.400
16. USC
.723
9
3
.584
15
  American Athletic
.429
20
20
.429
17. Wisconsin
.722
9
2
.537
45
  Sun Belt
.415
19
21
.430
18. UCLA
.717
8
3
.591
11
  Mountain West
.409
19
27
.460
19. Central Florida
.708
9
1
.460
79
  Mid-American
.392
20
32
.460
20. Notre Dame
.695
8
3
.566
22
  Conference USA
.379
20
36
.463
21. Fresno State
.694
10
0
.362
123
  *non-conference play
22. LSU
.690
8
3
.560
25
 
23. Texas A&M
.684
8
3
.553
29
 
24. Duke
.683
9
2
.491
68
 
25. Georgia
.677
7
4
.601
7
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Mississippi
.667
7
4
.590
12
 
76.
Rutgers
.478
5
5
.478
72
27.
Texas
.666
7
3
.550
33
 
77.
Colorado
.477
4
7
.560
26
28.
Washington
.664
7
4
.587
14
 
78.
TCU
.472
4
7
.555
28
29.
Miami, Fla.
.655
8
3
.520
55
 
79.
Illinois
.467
4
7
.550
35
30.
Louisville
.653
10
1
.392
113
 
80.
West Virginia
.465
4
7
.548
36
31.
Minnesota
.646
8
3
.510
60
 
81.
Wake Forest
.454
4
7
.537
46
32.
Virginia Tech
.645
7
4
.566
21
 
82.
SMU
.440
5
5
.440
92
33.
Arizona
.643
7
4
.564
23
 
83.
UNLV
.439
6
5
.412
103
34.
Nebraska
.634
8
3
.497
63
 
84.
Arkansas
.438
3
8
.577
17
35.
Michigan
.631
7
4
.552
31
 
85.
LA Monroe
.437
5
6
.464
74
36.
Washington State
.628
6
5
.602
6
 
86.
Troy
.435
5
6
.462
76
37.
BYU
.620
7
4
.540
42
 
87.
Florida Atlantic
.426
5
6
.453
82
38.
Iowa
.620
7
4
.539
43
 
88.
Texas State
.416
6
5
.390
115
39.
Vanderbilt
.614
7
4
.533
48
 
89.
San Jose State
.415
5
6
.442
91
40.
Georgia Tech
.613
7
4
.532
49
 
90.
Ohio
.415
6
5
.389
116
41.
Texas Tech
.607
7
4
.526
53
 
91.
Kansas
.407
3
8
.546
38
42.
Boston College
.599
7
4
.518
57
 
92.
Memphis
.394
3
7
.515
58
43.
Ball State
.585
9
2
.386
117
 
93.
N.C. State
.391
3
8
.529
52
44.
East Carolina
.584
9
2
.386
119
 
94.
Colorado State
.390
6
6
.390
114
45.
LA Lafayette
.583
8
2
.396
112
 
95.
Virginia
.390
2
9
.588
13
46.
Oregon State
.579
6
5
.552
30
 
96.
South Alabama
.387
4
6
.446
89
47.
Penn State
.578
6
5
.551
32
 
97.
Central Michigan
.381
5
6
.407
107
48.
Kansas State
.573
6
5
.546
39
 
98.
Nevada
.378
4
7
.458
80
49.
Pittsburgh
.571
6
5
.544
41
 
99.
Iowa State
.376
2
9
.574
18
50.
Cincinnati
.567
9
2
.370
122
 
100.
Kentucky
.374
2
9
.572
19
51.
North Carolina
.566
6
5
.539
44
 
101.
Akron
.372
4
7
.452
84
52.
Mississippi State
.565
5
6
.592
10
 
102.
California
.367
1
11
.635
2
53.
Houston
.562
7
4
.479
71
 
103.
Wyoming
.359
5
6
.385
120
54.
Utah
.558
4
7
.637
1
 
104.
Purdue
.353
1
10
.615
4
55.
Rice
.550
8
3
.411
104
 
105.
Kent State
.339
4
8
.435
94
56.
Toledo
.543
7
4
.461
78
 
106.
Tulsa
.320
3
8
.451
85
57.
Tennessee
.541
4
7
.621
3
 
107.
South Florida
.314
2
8
.494
66
58.
Navy
.539
7
4
.457
81
 
108.
Army
.306
3
7
.418
98
59.
Arkansas State
.532
7
4
.450
86
 
109.
New Mexico
.290
3
8
.417
101
60.
Buffalo
.523
8
3
.386
118
 
110.
UAB
.279
2
9
.464
75
61.
Maryland
.522
6
5
.495
64
 
111.
Louisiana Tech
.275
4
7
.346
125
62.
Indiana
.517
4
7
.598
8
 
112.
Idaho
.272
1
10
.522
54
63.
Syracuse
.508
5
6
.535
47
 
113.
Eastern Michigan
.270
2
9
.453
83
64.
Bowling Green
.507
8
3
.370
121
 
114.
New Mexico State
.250
1
10
.494
65
65.
Boise State
.505
7
4
.423
96
 
115.
Air Force
.246
2
9
.422
97
66.
Florida
.502
4
7
.584
16
 
116.
Connecticut
.245
1
9
.480
70
67.
North Texas
.500
7
4
.418
100
 
117.
Temple
.235
1
10
.474
73
68.
Utah State
.497
7
4
.416
102
 
118.
UTEP
.232
2
9
.404
109
69.
San Diego State
.492
7
4
.411
105
 
119.
Western Michigan
.216
1
10
.446
88
70.
UTSA
.489
6
5
.462
77
 
120.
Massachusetts
.214
1
10
.444
90
71.
Western Kentucky
.488
7
4
.406
108
 
121.
Hawaii
.195
0
11
.492
67
72.
Marshall
.487
8
3
.352
124
 
122.
Fla. International
.192
1
10
.410
106
73.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.483
7
4
.402
110
 
123.
Southern Miss
.168
0
11
.447
87
74.
Tulane
.480
7
4
.399
111
 
124.
Georgia State
.164
0
11
.440
93
75.
Northwestern
.480
4
7
.562
24
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.152
0
11
.418
99

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved