Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Oklahoma Finishes the Regular Season #1

  • Oklahoma, Utah, Texas, Florida, and Texas Tech are the most accomplished teams to date
  • #1 Oklahoma has beaten 6 current top-25 teams and lost only to #3 Texas
  • If you were to remove the name on the jersey, it would be very hard to deny the accomplishments of #2 Utah on the field: a 12-0 season in an above-average conference, with wins over #11 TCU, #18 BYU, and the only team that beat USC, #30 Oregon St.
  • #3 Texas is 11-1 versus the nation's 6th-toughest schedule, having played #1 Oklahoma, #19 Missouri, #17 Oklahoma St., and #5 Texas Tech all in a row
  • Like Texas, #4 Florida has 1 win versus the current top-10 and 3 wins versus the current top-25, but the Longhorns' loss was at #5 Texas Tech, while the Gators' loss was at home to #29 Mississippi
  • (11-1) Texas Tech rounds out the top-5, with (12-1) Alabama at #6
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has by far the most meaningful regular season in all of sports — now on to the bowls!
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 7

Nov. 30 Rankings
Nov. 23 Rankings
Nov. 16 Rankings
Nov. 9 Rankings
Nov. 2 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings
Oct. 19 Rankings
Oct. 12 Rankings
Oct. 5 Rankings
2007 Pre-Bowl Rankings
Final 2007-08 Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oklahoma
.805
12
1
.574
5
1-1
5-0
0
2.
Utah
.805
12
0
.507
64
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Texas
.800
11
1
.571
6
1-1
2-0
0
4.
Florida
.794
12
1
.557
20
1-0
2-0
1
5.
Texas Tech
.787
11
1
.552
23
1-1
2-0
0
6.
Alabama
.775
12
1
.529
43
0-1
1-0
0
7.
Boise State
.768
12
0
.453
84
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Penn State
.763
11
1
.518
52
1-0
1-0
1
9.
USC
.749
11
1
.498
68
1-0
0-0
1
10.
Ohio State
.737
10
2
.546
29
0-2
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. TCU
.708
10
2
.509
61
  Atlantic Coast
.615
37
11
.449
12. Cincinnati
.705
11
2
.497
69
  Big 12
.599
38
10
.419
13. Georgia
.702
9
3
.559
17
  Big East
.575
29
12
.449
14. Pittsburgh
.696
9
3
.552
24
  Southeastern
.572
37
11
.405
15. Michigan State
.688
9
3
.543
33
  Big Ten
.555
32
12
.416
16. Georgia Tech
.683
9
3
.537
35
  Pac-10
.520
14
17
.549
17. Oklahoma State
.679
9
3
.533
39
  Mountain West
.516
25
11
.398
18. BYU
.677
10
2
.473
78
  WAC
.462
18
19
.470
19. Missouri
.668
9
4
.557
21
  Mid-American
.423
22
30
.468
20. Virginia Tech
.662
9
4
.550
26
  Conference USA
.415
18
30
.490
21. Florida State
.659
8
4
.563
10
  Sun Belt
.356
13
27
.458
22. Boston College
.657
9
4
.545
32
  *non-conference play
23. Nebraska
.656
8
4
.560
13
 
24. North Carolina
.653
8
4
.556
22
 
25. Ball State
.651
12
1
.378
118
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. Northwestern
.643
9
3
.492
71
  73. Auburn
.475
5
7
.525
47
27. Oregon
.635
9
3
.484
74
  74. Kansas State
.464
5
7
.514
59
28. Wake Forest
.629
7
5
.581
2
  75. Purdue
.459
4
8
.560
14
29. Mississippi
.627
8
4
.528
44
  76. Louisville
.458
5
7
.509
63
30. Oregon State
.621
8
4
.522
50
  77. Texas A&M
.457
4
8
.558
18
31. Iowa
.616
8
4
.517
54
  78. Stanford
.455
5
7
.505
66
32. West Virginia
.615
8
4
.516
56
  79. San Jose State
.448
6
6
.448
88
33. Miami, Fla.
.609
7
5
.560
11
  80. New Mexico
.437
4
8
.538
34
34. Kansas
.608
7
5
.559
16
  81. Bowling Green
.435
6
6
.435
100
35. Air Force
.605
8
4
.505
65
  82. Arizona State
.434
5
7
.484
73
36. California
.603
8
4
.503
67
  83. Mississippi State
.428
4
8
.529
42
37. Clemson
.599
7
5
.550
27
  84. Southern Miss
.428
6
6
.428
103
38. South Carolina
.598
7
5
.548
28
  85. Northern Illinois
.426
6
6
.426
104
39. Maryland
.586
7
5
.536
36
  86. Florida Atlantic
.418
6
6
.418
107
40. Navy
.580
8
4
.479
77
  87. Wyoming
.415
4
8
.515
58
41. Connecticut
.578
7
5
.528
45
  88. Michigan
.414
3
9
.567
8
42. Western Michigan
.578
9
3
.424
105
  89. UCLA
.408
4
8
.509
62
43. Rutgers
.573
7
5
.523
49
  90. Syracuse
.407
3
9
.560
12
44. N.C. State
.568
6
6
.568
7
  91. Temple
.399
5
7
.448
90
45. East Carolina
.568
9
4
.451
86
  92. UTEP
.399
5
7
.448
91
46. LSU
.566
7
5
.517
55
  93. Memphis
.397
6
6
.397
113
47. Wisconsin
.566
7
5
.516
57
  94. Arkansas State
.395
6
6
.395
115
48. Rice
.564
9
3
.411
110
  95. Akron
.385
5
7
.434
102
49. South Florida
.563
7
5
.513
60
  96. LA Lafayette
.384
6
6
.384
117
50. Vanderbilt
.557
6
6
.557
19
  97. Indiana
.382
3
9
.534
37
51. Tulsa
.543
10
3
.378
119
  98. Utah State
.379
3
9
.531
40
52. Minnesota
.542
7
5
.492
72
  99. Marshall
.373
4
8
.471
79
53. Central Michigan
.540
8
4
.439
96
  100. Fla. International
.356
5
7
.403
111
54. Colorado State
.534
6
6
.534
38
  101. Ohio
.350
4
8
.447
93
55. Virginia
.532
5
7
.582
1
  102. Mid. Tenn. St.
.349
5
7
.396
114
56. Nevada
.531
7
5
.481
76
  103. Central Florida
.339
4
8
.434
101
57. Notre Dame
.529
6
6
.529
41
  104. UAB
.328
4
8
.423
106
58. Buffalo
.521
8
5
.451
85
  105. Iowa State
.321
2
10
.524
48
59. Kentucky
.518
6
6
.518
53
  106. New Mexico State
.319
3
9
.465
81
60. Colorado
.517
5
7
.567
9
  107. Kent State
.318
4
8
.411
109
61. Fresno State
.510
7
5
.460
82
  108. San Diego State
.316
2
10
.519
51
62. Arkansas
.510
5
7
.559
15
  109. Eastern Michigan
.306
3
9
.450
87
63. Hawaii
.506
7
6
.483
75
  110. Army
.303
3
9
.447
92
64. Troy
.497
8
4
.397
112
  111. LA Monroe
.301
4
8
.392
116
65. Arizona
.497
7
5
.447
94
  112. Toledo
.296
3
9
.438
97
66. Illinois
.496
5
7
.546
30
  113. Washington State
.287
2
11
.493
70
67. Tennessee
.496
5
7
.546
31
  114. Idaho
.265
2
10
.457
83
68. Houston
.490
7
5
.440
95
  115. Tulane
.258
2
10
.448
89
69. Louisiana Tech
.488
7
5
.438
98
  116. Miami, Ohio
.249
2
10
.437
99
70. Baylor
.478
4
8
.579
3
  117. Washington
.235
0
12
.551
25
71. Duke
.478
4
8
.578
4
  118. SMU
.226
1
11
.467
80
72. UNLV
.477
5
7
.527
46
  119. North Texas
.192
1
11
.417
108

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2008 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved