Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Alabama & Clemson Are Far Ahead of the Field

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • With 3 wins versus the current top-10, undefeated Alabama is #1
  • The gap between #2 Clemson and #3 Notre Dame (.037) is huge—bigger than the gap between #15 Fresno State and #25 Iowa (.033)
  • In the conference ratings, the Big 12 rose the most (up .025), and the MAC fell the most (down .014), during the bowl games
  • The SEC lands 6 teams in the top-25 (all in the top-12), the Big Ten 5, the Big 12 3, and the Pac-12, ACC, American Athletic, and Mountain West 2 apiece
  • Army finishes in the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Jan. 5

Dec. 2 Rankings
Nov. 25 Rankings
Nov. 19 Rankings
Nov. 12 Rankings
Nov. 5 Rankings
Oct. 29 Rankings
Oct. 22 Rankings
Oct. 15 Rankings
Oct. 8 Rankings

Final 2017-18 Rankings
Final 17 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.842
14
0
.572
15
3-0
1-0
0
2.
Clemson
.832
14
0
.553
31
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Notre Dame
.795
12
1
.558
26
1-1
2-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.782
13
1
.535
46
1-0
3-0
1
5.
Oklahoma
.765
12
2
.565
19
0-1
3-1
0
6.
Georgia
.754
11
3
.600
1
1-2
1-1
0
7.
LSU
.734
10
3
.585
3
2-1
0-2
0
8.
Michigan
.730
10
3
.580
9
0-2
2-1
0
9.
UCF
.720
12
1
.456
88
0-1
1-0
0
10.
Kentucky
.715
10
3
.562
22
0-1
2-1
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Florida
.711
10
3
.557
27
  Southeastern
.649
56
11
.441
12.
Texas A&M
.704
9
4
.598
2
  Big 12
.588
26
10
.452
13.
Texas
.697
10
4
.576
13
  Big Ten
.578
33
18
.490
14.
Washington St.
.695
11
2
.485
68
  Atlantic Coast
.574
42
23
.486
15.
Fresno State
.683
12
2
.463
84
  Pac-12
.551
27
16
.474
16.
Syracuse
.674
10
3
.514
54
  Sun Belt
.463
24
20
.436
17.
Penn State
.668
9
4
.557
28
  Mountain West
.454
29
25
.432
18.
Washington
.665
10
4
.540
42
  American Athletic
.446
27
28
.452
19.
Boise State
.663
10
3
.502
60
  Conference USA
.402
26
36
.450
20.
Appalachian St.
.656
11
2
.441
100
  Mid-American
.402
19
35
.491
21.
Cincinnati
.655
11
2
.439
101
  *non-conference play
22.
Northwestern
.654
9
5
.572
16
 
23.
Army
.652
11
2
.436
103
 
24.
West Virginia
.651
8
4
.554
29
 
25.
Iowa
.650
9
4
.537
45
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Mississippi State
.649
8
5
.583
5
 
79.
San Diego State
.488
7
6
.465
82
27.
Stanford
.648
9
4
.534
47
 
80.
Louisiana Tech
.485
8
5
.416
116
28.
Auburn
.643
8
5
.576
12
 
81.
Memphis
.480
8
6
.437
102
29.
Missouri
.640
8
5
.574
14
 
82.
Wyoming
.476
6
6
.476
72
30.
Utah State
.639
11
2
.422
111
 
83.
Louisiana 
.473
7
7
.473
74
31.
Iowa State
.617
8
5
.550
34
 
84.
South Florida
.468
7
6
.445
94
32.
Utah
.617
9
5
.532
48
 
85.
Nebraska
.463
4
8
.564
20
33.
N.C. State
.611
9
4
.495
62
 
86.
Miami, Ohio
.452
6
6
.452
90
34.
Duke
.608
8
5
.540
43
 
87.
LA Monroe
.444
6
6
.444
96
35.
Troy
.607
10
3
.441
99
 
88.
Southern Miss
.441
6
5
.414
119
36.
UAB
.603
11
3
.427
109
 
89.
Western Michigan
.440
7
6
.418
112
37.
South Carolina
.602
7
6
.579
10
 
90.
Arizona
.438
5
7
.488
66
38.
Georgia Southern
.597
10
3
.431
107
 
91.
Eastern Michigan
.436
7
6
.414
120
39.
Oregon
.594
9
4
.477
71
 
92.
SMU
.431
5
7
.481
69
40.
Wisconsin
.585
8
5
.516
51
 
93.
UCLA
.430
3
9
.583
4
41.
Pittsburgh
.581
7
7
.581
8
 
94.
Colorado
.429
5
7
.479
70
42.
TCU
.581
7
6
.558
25
 
95.
Toledo
.426
7
6
.404
124
43.
Michigan State
.577
7
6
.554
30
 
96.
Florida Atlantic
.419
5
7
.468
79
44.
Oklahoma State
.575
7
6
.553
32
 
97.
Coastal Carolina
.419
5
7
.468
80
45.
Minnesota
.571
7
6
.549
37
 
98.
Liberty
.417
6
6
.417
114
46.
Boston College
.571
7
5
.522
49
 
99.
Air Force
.406
5
7
.455
89
47.
Baylor
.564
7
6
.541
39
 
100.
Illinois
.396
4
8
.496
61
48.
Wake Forest
.561
7
6
.538
44
 
101.
Charlotte
.395
5
7
.444
95
49.
Purdue
.558
6
7
.581
7
 
102.
Massachusetts
.372
4
8
.470
77
50.
Virginia
.558
8
5
.489
65
 
103.
Kansas
.367
3
9
.519
50
51.
Vanderbilt
.554
6
7
.577
11
 
104.
Louisville
.362
2
10
.570
17
52.
Arizona State
.539
7
6
.516
52
 
105.
Arkansas
.352
2
10
.559
24
53.
Miami, Fla.
.533
7
6
.510
57
 
106.
Navy
.349
3
10
.511
56
54.
Marshall
.533
9
4
.416
115
 
107.
UNLV
.340
4
8
.436
104
55.
Tennessee
.532
5
7
.582
6
 
108.
Oregon State
.335
2
10
.541
40
56.
Georgia Tech
.532
7
6
.509
59
 
109.
Akron
.335
4
8
.430
108
57.
Temple
.531
8
5
.461
86
 
110.
South Alabama
.325
3
9
.472
75
58.
Buffalo
.528
10
4
.398
128
 
111.
New Mexico
.320
3
9
.467
81
59.
Florida State
.519
5
7
.569
18
 
112.
North Carolina
.319
2
9
.512
55
60.
Ohio
.519
9
4
.403
125
 
113.
Colorado State
.317
3
9
.463
83
61.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.518
8
6
.475
73
 
114.
East Carolina
.316
3
9
.462
85
62.
BYU
.517
7
6
.494
63
 
115.
Ball State
.315
4
8
.409
121
63.
Indiana
.513
5
7
.563
21
 
116.
Old Dominion
.312
4
8
.405
123
64.
California
.513
7
6
.490
64
 
117.
UTSA
.303
3
9
.446
93
65.
Nevada
.512
8
5
.442
98
 
118.
Tulsa
.300
3
9
.443
97
66.
Maryland
.511
5
7
.561
23
 
119.
Rutgers
.290
1
11
.551
33
67.
North Texas
.508
9
4
.392
129
 
120.
New Mexico State
.290
3
9
.432
106
68.
Fla. International
.506
9
4
.390
130
 
121.
Texas State
.275
3
9
.414
118
69.
Arkansas State
.503
8
5
.434
105
 
122.
Georgia State
.275
2
10
.469
78
70.
Northern Illinois
.502
8
6
.459
87
 
123.
Bowling Green
.269
3
9
.407
122
71.
Texas Tech
.499
5
7
.549
35
 
124.
Western Kentucky
.265
3
9
.401
126
72.
Kansas State
.499
5
7
.549
36
 
125.
San Jose State
.257
1
11
.510
58
73.
Mississippi
.498
5
7
.548
38
 
126.
Rice
.250
2
11
.447
92
74.
Tulane
.494
7
6
.471
76
 
127.
Connecticut
.240
1
11
.486
67
75.
Virginia Tech
.492
6
7
.515
53
 
128.
Kent State
.233
2
10
.415
117
76.
Houston
.492
8
5
.423
110
 
129.
Central Michigan
.192
1
11
.417
113
77.
USC
.490
5
7
.540
41
 
130.
UTEP
.181
1
11
.398
127
78.
Hawaii
.489
8
6
.447
91
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2019 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved