Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Alabama Hits #1 for the First Time This Season

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • The top 4 teams have separated themselves from the rest of the field
  • There is a large (.038) gap between #4 Clemson and #6 Oklahoma, with #5 Michigan being about halfway in between them
  • The current top-10 has gone 16-3 (.842) versus teams currently ranked #11-25
  • Outside of the top-10, every team has either played a below-average schedule or else has 3 or more losses
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 12

Nov. 5 Rankings
Oct. 29 Rankings
Oct. 22 Rankings
Oct. 15 Rankings
Oct. 8 Rankings

Final 2017-18 Rankings
Final 17 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.833
10
0
.555
33
1-0
2-0
0
2.
Georgia
.831
9
1
.633
3
0-1
4-0
0
3.
Notre Dame
.825
10
0
.540
42
1-0
0-0
0
4.
Clemson
.819
10
0
.530
49
0-0
2-0
0
5.
Michigan
.798
9
1
.581
18
0-1
2-0
0
6.
Oklahoma
.781
9
1
.557
31
0-0
2-1
0
7.
Ohio State
.770
9
1
.540
43
0-0
2-0
1
8.
LSU
.767
8
2
.608
10
1-1
1-1
0
9.
West Virginia
.762
8
1
.538
44
0-0
1-1
0
10.
UCF
.751
9
0
.429
111
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Florida
.749
7
3
.646
2
  Southeastern
.660
38
5
.417
12. Washington St.
.717
9
1
.471
80
  Big Ten
.582
28
14
.481
13. Kentucky
.711
7
3
.601
11
  Big 12
.582
21
7
.428
14. Penn State
.702
7
3
.591
15
  Atlantic Coast
.570
33
14
.447
15. South Carolina
.693
5
4
.664
1
  Pac-12
.544
23
11
.437
16. Cincinnati
.690
9
1
.438
100
  American Athletic
.461
25
21
.435
17. Texas
.688
7
3
.575
21
  Sun Belt
.457
21
18
.434
18. Mississippi St.
.676
6
4
.621
4
  Mountain West
.453
26
23
.435
19. Iowa State
.674
6
3
.579
19
  Mid-American
.422
18
29
.492
20. Boise State
.673
8
2
.492
64
  Conference USA
.387
21
30
.438
21. Missouri
.672
6
4
.616
6
  *non-conference play
22. Syracuse
.668
8
2
.486
70
 
23. Texas A&M
.667
6
4
.611
7
 
24. Michigan State
.664
6
4
.608
9
 
25. Army
.657
8
2
.474
77
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Utah State
.657
9
1
.402
124
 
79.
Tulane
.492
5
5
.492
63
27.
Utah
.654
7
3
.537
45
 
80.
Kansas State
.491
4
6
.552
35
28.
Buffalo
.653
9
1
.398
126
 
81.
Virginia Tech
.488
4
5
.521
54
29.
Northwestern
.650
6
4
.593
14
 
82.
Arizona
.486
5
5
.486
68
30.
Washington
.644
7
3
.526
50
 
83.
Colorado
.484
5
5
.484
71
31.
Auburn
.643
6
4
.586
17
 
84.
Eastern Michigan
.480
6
5
.453
89
32.
Duke
.642
7
3
.523
52
 
85.
Coastal Carolina
.480
5
5
.480
75
33.
Boston College
.637
7
3
.518
55
 
86.
Western Michigan
.478
6
4
.419
115
34.
UAB
.636
9
1
.381
129
 
87.
Louisiana 
.473
5
5
.473
78
35.
Pittsburgh
.632
6
4
.575
20
 
88.
Hawaii
.470
6
5
.443
95
36.
Fresno State
.631
8
2
.445
94
 
89.
Florida Atlantic
.470
5
5
.470
81
37.
N.C. State
.624
6
3
.526
51
 
90.
Ohio
.465
6
4
.406
122
38.
Stanford
.623
6
4
.565
24
 
91.
Memphis
.461
6
4
.402
123
39.
Iowa
.623
6
4
.565
25
 
92.
Toledo
.451
5
5
.451
92
40.
Troy
.623
8
2
.437
103
 
93.
Nebraska
.440
3
7
.562
27
41.
Tennessee
.610
5
5
.610
8
 
94.
Wyoming
.435
4
6
.495
61
42.
Virginia
.609
7
3
.488
67
 
95.
Illinois
.423
4
6
.483
73
43.
Appalachian St.
.602
7
2
.431
109
 
96.
Akron
.421
4
5
.454
88
44.
Arizona State
.595
6
4
.536
48
 
97.
Air Force
.421
4
6
.481
74
45.
Purdue
.594
5
5
.594
13
 
98.
Miami, Ohio
.416
4
6
.476
76
46.
Northern Illinois
.582
7
3
.460
85
 
99.
UCLA
.412
2
8
.598
12
47.
Texas Tech
.571
5
5
.571
22
 
100.
Liberty
.403
4
5
.436
104
48.
Wisconsin
.570
6
4
.510
59
 
101.
Southern Miss
.398
4
5
.431
110
49.
San Diego State
.568
7
3
.446
93
 
102.
Massachusetts
.379
4
7
.459
86
50.
Mississippi
.564
5
5
.564
26
 
103.
Kansas
.378
3
7
.498
60
51.
Georgia Southern
.564
7
3
.442
97
 
104.
Charlotte
.375
4
6
.433
108
52.
Vanderbilt
.561
4
6
.619
5
 
105.
Louisville
.373
2
8
.558
30
53.
Indiana
.559
5
5
.559
28
 
106.
Arkansas
.366
2
8
.551
36
54.
Louisiana Tech
.557
7
3
.435
105
 
107.
Oregon State
.363
2
8
.548
38
55.
Baylor
.555
5
5
.555
32
 
108.
Navy
.352
2
8
.536
46
56.
Temple
.553
6
4
.493
62
 
109.
Colorado State
.342
3
7
.459
87
57.
Georgia Tech
.550
6
4
.490
66
 
110.
New Mexico
.328
3
7
.443
96
58.
Maryland
.549
5
5
.549
37
 
111.
UTSA
.326
3
7
.441
98
59.
USC
.548
5
5
.548
39
 
112.
UNLV
.320
3
7
.434
106
60.
California
.547
6
4
.486
69
 
113.
Old Dominion
.315
3
7
.429
112
61.
Wake Forest
.543
5
5
.543
40
 
114.
North Carolina
.312
1
8
.555
34
62.
Oregon
.543
6
4
.483
72
 
115.
Ball State
.308
3
7
.421
114
63.
Oklahoma State
.541
5
5
.541
41
 
116.
Rutgers
.307
1
9
.558
29
64.
Houston
.539
7
3
.417
117
 
117.
East Carolina
.306
2
7
.469
82
65.
South Florida
.539
7
3
.417
118
 
118.
New Mexico State
.306
3
7
.418
116
66.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.538
7
3
.417
119
 
119.
South Alabama
.296
2
8
.472
79
67.
Minnesota
.536
5
5
.536
47
 
120.
Tulsa
.293
2
8
.469
84
68.
TCU
.530
4
6
.590
16
 
121.
Texas State
.280
3
7
.389
127
69.
Nevada
.529
6
4
.469
83
 
122.
Georgia State
.280
2
8
.453
91
70.
Miami, Fla.
.521
5
5
.521
53
 
123.
Connecticut
.269
1
9
.512
58
71.
BYU
.517
5
5
.517
56
 
124.
Kent State
.265
2
8
.434
107
72.
SMU
.514
5
5
.514
57
 
125.
San Jose State
.253
1
9
.491
65
73.
North Texas
.507
7
3
.386
128
 
126.
Bowling Green
.248
2
8
.412
121
74.
Florida State
.506
4
6
.566
23
 
127.
Central Michigan
.220
1
10
.453
90
75.
Marshall
.499
6
3
.399
125
 
128.
Rice
.212
1
10
.440
99
76.
LA Monroe
.498
6
4
.438
101
 
129.
UTEP
.204
1
9
.422
113
77.
Arkansas State
.498
6
4
.438
102
 
130.
Western Kentucky
.198
1
9
.413
120
78.
Fla. International
.497
7
3
.377
130
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2018 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved