Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Half of the Top-10 Is from the SEC

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • After #1 Clemson and #2 Notre Dame, 5 of the next 7 teams are from the Southeastern Conference, which has won 88% of its non-conference games
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 22

October 15 Rankings
October 8 Rankings

Final 2017-18 Rankings
Final 17 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Clemson
.832
7
0
.553
23
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Notre Dame
.828
7
0
.546
31
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Alabama
.816
8
0
.525
45
0-0
1-0
0
4.
LSU
.792
7
1
.591
8
1-1
0-0
0
5.
Florida
.782
6
1
.589
9
1-1
0-0
0
6.
Michigan
.781
7
1
.575
17
0-1
0-0
0
7.
Oklahoma
.777
6
1
.582
13
0-1
0-0
0
8.
Georgia
.773
6
1
.577
16
0-1
1-0
0
9.
Kentucky
.772
6
1
.575
18
1-0
0-1
0
10.
Texas
.765
6
1
.565
20
1-0
0-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Iowa
.741
6
1
.533
39
  Southeastern
.659
36
5
.421
12. UCF
.732
7
0
.406
124
  Big 12
.594
21
7
.441
13. N.C. State
.725
5
1
.530
42
  Big Ten
.586
27
13
.480
14. Ohio State
.723
7
1
.498
60
  Atlantic Coast
.576
32
13
.448
15. Texas A&M
.714
5
2
.596
7
  Pac-12
.547
23
11
.440
16. South Florida
.706
7
0
.375
130
  American Athletic
.468
25
19
.428
17. Stanford
.705
5
2
.586
12
  Sun Belt
.454
20
18
.438
18. West Virginia
.701
5
1
.501
58
  Mountain West
.453
25
22
.434
19. Washington
.683
6
2
.537
35
  Mid-American
.418
17
28
.491
20. San Diego State
.674
6
1
.453
90
  Conference USA
.394
21
28
.435
21. Utah
.671
5
2
.546
29
  *non-conference play
22. Penn State
.665
5
2
.540
34
 
23. Washington St.
.660
6
1
.437
101
 
24. South Carolina
.658
3
3
.658
1
 
25. Duke
.657
5
2
.531
40
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Buffalo
.655
7
1
.419
113
 
79.
Eastern Michigan
.487
4
4
.487
70
27.
Virginia
.653
5
2
.527
44
 
80.
Wake Forest
.487
3
4
.530
43
28.
Army
.649
5
2
.522
46
 
81.
Liberty
.479
4
3
.436
102
29.
Fresno State
.647
6
1
.423
109
 
82.
SMU
.473
3
4
.516
50
30.
Wisconsin
.643
5
2
.516
51
 
83.
California
.469
4
3
.427
106
31.
Mississippi State
.642
4
3
.602
6
 
84.
Georgia Tech
.469
3
4
.512
53
32.
UAB
.641
6
1
.417
114
 
85.
UCLA
.455
2
5
.586
11
33.
Cincinnati
.639
6
1
.414
118
 
86.
Nevada
.453
4
4
.453
91
34.
Texas Tech
.637
5
2
.509
54
 
87.
LA Monroe
.450
4
4
.450
93
35.
Appalachian St.
.635
5
1
.427
105
 
88.
Florida Atlantic
.450
3
4
.493
64
36.
Utah State
.635
6
1
.410
120
 
89.
Akron
.449
3
3
.449
95
37.
Miami, Fla.
.633
5
2
.505
55
 
90.
Ohio
.448
4
3
.406
123
38.
Georgia Southern
.628
6
1
.402
126
 
91.
Illinois
.439
3
4
.482
77
39.
Auburn
.624
5
3
.551
26
 
92.
Louisiana 
.435
3
4
.478
79
40.
Michigan State
.621
4
3
.580
14
 
93.
Toledo
.427
3
4
.469
82
41.
USC
.620
4
3
.579
15
 
94.
Memphis
.425
4
4
.425
108
42.
Iowa State
.617
3
3
.617
3
 
95.
Arizona
.422
3
5
.497
61
43.
Colorado
.615
5
2
.486
72
 
96.
Southern Miss
.415
3
3
.415
117
44.
Boise State
.615
5
2
.485
73
 
97.
Air Force
.396
3
4
.438
100
45.
Syracuse
.614
5
2
.485
74
 
98.
Arkansas
.393
2
6
.546
30
46.
Mississippi
.610
5
3
.536
36
 
99.
Colorado State
.393
3
5
.466
84
47.
Boston College
.609
5
2
.479
78
 
100.
Miami, Ohio
.392
3
5
.466
86
48.
Houston
.607
6
1
.382
129
 
101.
New Mexico
.386
3
4
.428
104
49.
Missouri
.599
4
3
.557
21
 
102.
Nebraska
.383
1
6
.608
4
50.
Maryland
.599
4
3
.557
22
 
103.
Louisville
.375
2
5
.503
56
51.
Purdue
.594
4
3
.552
24
 
104.
Charlotte
.372
3
4
.413
119
52.
Northwestern
.592
4
3
.550
27
 
105.
Tulane
.370
2
5
.499
59
53.
Virginia Tech
.588
4
2
.488
68
 
106.
Wyoming
.362
2
6
.514
52
54.
Oregon
.583
5
2
.452
92
 
107.
East Carolina
.360
2
5
.487
69
55.
Western Michigan
.575
6
2
.421
111
 
108.
Georgia State
.359
2
5
.486
71
56.
Louisiana Tech
.572
5
2
.441
99
 
109.
Ball State
.351
3
5
.422
110
57.
North Texas
.570
6
2
.416
115
 
110.
Massachusetts
.345
2
6
.494
62
58.
Indiana
.568
4
4
.568
19
 
111.
Kansas
.343
2
5
.469
83
59.
Troy
.565
5
2
.434
103
 
112.
UTSA
.336
3
5
.406
122
60.
TCU
.563
3
4
.605
5
 
113.
North Carolina
.330
1
5
.535
38
61.
Baylor
.559
4
3
.517
49
 
114.
South Alabama
.325
2
5
.449
94
62.
Vanderbilt
.559
3
5
.632
2
 
115.
Connecticut
.323
1
6
.545
32
63.
Fla. International
.551
5
2
.421
112
 
116.
Navy
.320
2
5
.444
96
64.
Tennessee
.544
3
4
.586
10
 
117.
New Mexico State
.314
2
6
.460
87
65.
BYU
.544
4
3
.501
57
 
118.
Tulsa
.311
1
6
.530
41
66.
Temple
.542
5
3
.466
85
 
119.
UNLV
.305
2
5
.427
107
67.
Marshall
.539
5
2
.409
121
 
120.
Old Dominion
.298
2
6
.441
98
68.
Florida State
.535
4
3
.492
65
 
121.
Rutgers
.289
1
7
.518
48
69.
Northern Illinois
.534
4
3
.491
66
 
122.
Oregon State
.276
1
6
.489
67
70.
Oklahoma State
.527
4
3
.484
75
 
123.
Central Michigan
.270
1
7
.494
63
71.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.527
4
3
.484
76
 
124.
Bowling Green
.244
1
7
.459
88
72.
Coastal Carolina
.519
4
3
.476
80
 
125.
Rice
.241
1
7
.456
89
73.
Arkansas State
.512
4
3
.469
81
 
126.
Kent State
.231
1
7
.443
97
74.
Arizona State
.509
3
4
.552
25
 
127.
San Jose State
.212
0
7
.518
47
75.
Pittsburgh
.507
3
4
.549
28
 
128.
Western Kentucky
.206
1
6
.394
127
76.
Hawaii
.503
6
3
.403
125
 
129.
Texas State
.204
1
6
.391
128
77.
Minnesota
.500
3
4
.542
33
 
130.
UTEP
.151
0
7
.415
116
78.
Kansas State
.493
3
4
.535
37
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2018 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved