Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Georgia Moves to #1

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • The Bulldogs, who have gone 8-1 versus the nation’s 2nd-toughest schedule to date, have played 5 games versus the top-30—none of them at home
  • After 3-straight weeks at #1, Clemson falls to #4, as Georgia, Alabama, and Notre Dame all post good wins on the road
  • Michigan cracks the top-5, and UCF the top-10, for the first time this season
  • The SEC has 10 teams in the top-30
  • The Pac-12 is the conference of parity: only 3 of its teams are ranked in the top-30 or the bottom-50
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 5

Oct. 29 Rankings
Oct. 22 Rankings
Oct. 15 Rankings
Oct. 8 Rankings

Final 2017-18 Rankings
Final 17 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.834
8
1
.646
2
1-1
2-0
0
2.
Alabama
.829
9
0
.548
31
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Notre Dame
.827
9
0
.544
33
1-0
0-0
0
4.
Clemson
.814
9
0
.522
51
0-0
2-0
0
5.
Michigan
.794
8
1
.584
18
0-1
2-0
0
6.
Oklahoma
.779
8
1
.561
25
0-0
2-1
0
7.
LSU
.774
7
2
.632
4
1-1
1-1
0
8.
West Virginia
.754
7
1
.538
42
0-0
1-1
0
9.
Kentucky
.754
7
2
.605
8
0-1
3-0
1
10.
UCF
.752
8
0
.431
103
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Ohio State
.739
8
1
.507
56
  Southeastern
.664
38
5
.422
12. Florida
.731
6
3
.644
3
  Big 12
.587
21
7
.434
13. South Carolina
.720
5
3
.655
1
  Big Ten
.581
28
14
.480
14. Washington St.
.708
8
1
.468
86
  Atlantic Coast
.569
32
13
.440
15. Mississippi St.
.689
6
3
.596
10
  Pac-12
.543
23
11
.435
16. Michigan State
.688
6
3
.595
12
  American Athletic
.462
25
21
.436
17. Penn State
.686
6
3
.593
15
  Sun Belt
.455
21
18
.432
18. N.C. State
.672
6
2
.525
48
  Mountain West
.450
26
23
.432
19. Texas
.670
6
3
.575
20
  Mid-American
.424
18
29
.494
20. Cincinnati
.670
8
1
.424
111
  Conference USA
.388
21
30
.440
21. Fresno State
.668
8
1
.422
112
  *non-conference play
22. Syracuse
.663
7
2
.496
61
 
23. Boston College
.663
7
2
.496
62
 
24. Army
.663
7
2
.496
63
 
25. Iowa State
.661
5
3
.591
16
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Buffalo
.660
8
1
.414
118
 
79.
Arizona
.490
5
5
.490
68
27.
Missouri
.655
5
4
.624
5
 
80.
Minnesota
.488
4
5
.522
52
28.
Auburn
.654
6
3
.558
27
 
81.
Western Michigan
.484
6
4
.425
108
29.
Utah State
.654
8
1
.407
120
 
82.
Fla. International
.479
6
3
.380
128
30.
Texas A&M
.653
5
4
.622
6
 
83.
Toledo
.478
5
4
.445
98
31.
Iowa
.650
6
3
.554
28
 
84.
Eastern Michigan
.474
5
5
.474
79
32.
Boise State
.646
7
2
.477
77
 
85.
Hawaii
.472
6
5
.445
97
33.
Washington
.643
7
3
.524
49
 
86.
Marshall
.471
5
3
.397
126
34.
Utah
.640
6
3
.542
36
 
87.
Tulane
.470
4
5
.503
57
35.
UAB
.640
8
1
.392
127
 
88.
Kansas State
.469
3
6
.570
22
36.
Duke
.640
6
3
.542
37
 
89.
Arkansas State
.468
5
4
.435
102
37.
Purdue
.629
5
4
.597
9
 
90.
Illinois
.456
4
5
.489
69
38.
San Diego State
.627
7
2
.457
92
 
91.
Louisiana 
.454
4
5
.487
71
39.
Northwestern
.626
5
4
.595
14
 
92.
Florida Atlantic
.454
4
5
.487
72
40.
Stanford
.622
5
4
.590
17
 
93.
Memphis
.448
5
4
.415
117
41.
Appalachian St.
.611
6
2
.458
91
 
94.
Akron
.446
4
4
.446
96
42.
Pittsburgh
.609
5
4
.577
19
 
95.
Wyoming
.430
4
6
.490
67
43.
Virginia
.602
6
3
.502
59
 
96.
UCLA
.423
2
7
.595
13
44.
Georgia Southern
.598
7
2
.426
106
 
97.
Liberty
.420
4
4
.420
115
45.
Texas Tech
.597
5
4
.565
24
 
98.
Southern Miss
.419
4
4
.419
116
46.
Troy
.596
7
2
.424
110
 
99.
Massachusetts
.411
4
6
.470
82
47.
Wisconsin
.591
6
3
.491
65
 
100.
Kansas
.403
3
6
.503
58
48.
Mississippi
.591
5
4
.558
26
 
101.
Nebraska
.399
2
7
.571
21
49.
Arizona State
.586
5
4
.553
29
 
102.
Charlotte
.394
4
5
.427
105
50.
Vanderbilt
.582
4
5
.614
7
 
103.
Air Force
.387
3
6
.487
73
51.
Houston
.582
7
2
.410
119
 
104.
Miami, Ohio
.370
3
6
.469
83
52.
Maryland
.578
5
4
.545
32
 
105.
Louisville
.370
2
7
.540
40
53.
South Florida
.577
7
2
.405
122
 
106.
Arkansas
.368
2
7
.538
43
54.
USC
.574
5
4
.541
38
 
107.
Oregon State
.365
2
7
.535
45
55.
Baylor
.573
5
4
.540
39
 
108.
Colorado State
.353
3
6
.450
94
56.
North Texas
.572
7
2
.400
124
 
109.
New Mexico
.352
3
6
.449
95
57.
Northern Illinois
.571
6
3
.470
81
 
110.
UTSA
.345
3
6
.442
99
58.
Louisiana Tech
.569
6
3
.469
85
 
111.
Navy
.341
2
7
.508
55
59.
Tennessee
.564
4
5
.596
11
 
112.
East Carolina
.315
2
6
.460
90
60.
Oregon
.563
6
3
.462
89
 
113.
Ball State
.313
3
7
.426
107
61.
Miami, Fla.
.555
5
4
.522
50
 
114.
Tulsa
.310
2
7
.473
80
62.
Oklahoma State
.550
5
4
.517
53
 
115.
North Carolina
.307
1
7
.539
41
63.
TCU
.537
4
5
.570
23
 
116.
South Alabama
.306
2
7
.469
84
64.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.531
6
3
.430
104
 
117.
Rutgers
.296
1
8
.536
44
65.
Temple
.526
5
4
.492
64
 
118.
Georgia State
.293
2
7
.453
93
66.
Nevada
.524
5
4
.490
66
 
119.
Texas State
.284
3
6
.373
130
67.
Coastal Carolina
.521
5
4
.488
70
 
120.
Connecticut
.275
1
8
.511
54
68.
Indiana
.518
4
5
.551
30
 
121.
New Mexico State
.270
3
7
.377
129
69.
Georgia Tech
.517
5
4
.484
75
 
122.
UNLV
.269
2
7
.424
109
70.
California
.513
5
4
.480
76
 
123.
Old Dominion
.267
2
7
.421
113
71.
SMU
.510
4
5
.544
34
 
124.
Kent State
.266
2
7
.421
114
72.
Florida State
.510
4
5
.543
35
 
125.
Central Michigan
.248
1
9
.484
74
73.
Ohio
.501
6
3
.401
123
 
126.
San Jose State
.248
1
8
.476
78
74.
Wake Forest
.501
4
5
.534
46
 
127.
Bowling Green
.220
1
8
.437
101
75.
Virginia Tech
.497
4
4
.497
60
 
128.
Rice
.215
1
9
.438
100
76.
LA Monroe
.496
5
4
.463
87
 
129.
UTEP
.199
1
8
.406
121
77.
Colorado
.496
5
4
.463
88
 
130.
Western Kentucky
.195
1
8
.399
125
78.
BYU
.496
4
5
.529
47
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2018 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved