Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Alabama Edges UCF for #1

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • The 1-loss Crimson Tide nips the undefeated Knights for the top spot
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, 2017-18

Jan. 2 Rankings
Dec. 3 Rankings
Nov. 27 Rankings
Nov. 20 Rankings
Nov. 13 Rankings
Nov. 6 Rankings
Oct. 30 Rankings
Oct. 23 Rankings
Oct. 16 Rankings
Oct. 9 Rankings

Final 2016-17 Rankings
Final ’16 Pre-Bowl Rankings


Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.810
13
1
.577
18
2-0
2-1
0
2.
UCF
.808
13
0
.512
61
0-0
3-0
0
3.
Wisconsin
.796
13
1
.556
31
0-1
4-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.795
12
2
.608
5
3-1
2-1
0
5.
Georgia
.793
13
2
.599
9
2-1
3-1
0
6.
Penn State
.785
11
2
.601
8
0-2
4-0
0
7.
Clemson
.774
12
2
.578
16
0-1
4-0
1
8.
Oklahoma
.760
12
2
.559
25
1-1
3-0
1
9.
Notre Dame
.749
10
3
.605
6
1-1
3-1
1
10.
Michigan State
.748
10
3
.603
7
1-2
2-1
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Northwestern
.723
10
3
.572
19
  Big Ten
.658
39
11
.489
12. USC
.719
11
3
.556
29
  Southeastern
.615
49
15
.452
13. Miami, Fla.
.715
10
3
.561
24
  Atlantic Coast
.593
43
21
.489
14. Auburn
.706
10
4
.586
12
  Big 12
.554
25
13
.459
15. TCU
.697
11
3
.530
50
  Pac-12
.554
29
16
.466
16. Iowa
.695
8
5
.632
2
  American Athletic
.508
29
22
.467
17. Washington
.673
10
3
.513
60
  Mountain West
.427
24
31
.464
18. Michigan
.672
8
5
.608
4
  Mid-American
.413
22
31
.464
19. Oklahoma State
.670
10
3
.509
64
  Conference USA
.403
28
36
.439
20. South Carolina
.668
9
4
.557
28
  Sun Belt
.342
17
34
.439
21. N.C. State
.667
9
4
.556
30
  *non-conference play
22. LSU
.661
9
4
.549
34
 
23. Memphis
.658
10
3
.496
71
 
24. Boise State
.657
11
3
.484
75
 
25. Mississippi State
.656
9
4
.544
38
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Stanford
.649
9
5
.566
22
 
79.
Southern Miss
.467
8
5
.399
116
27.
South Florida
.638
10
2
.431
97
 
80.
Akron
.462
7
7
.462
84
28.
Florida Atlantic
.637
11
3
.462
85
 
81.
Louisiana Tech
.458
7
6
.435
95
29.
Virginia Tech
.633
9
4
.519
56
 
82.
Arkansas
.458
4
8
.559
26
30.
Washington State
.630
9
4
.516
58
 
83.
Tulane
.456
5
7
.506
67
31.
Wake Forest
.623
8
5
.556
32
 
84.
California
.455
5
7
.505
68
32.
Army
.621
10
3
.456
88
 
85.
Tennessee
.450
4
8
.551
33
33.
Troy
.611
11
2
.394
118
 
86.
Western Michigan
.441
6
6
.441
92
34.
Boston College
.609
7
6
.587
11
 
87.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.440
7
6
.417
104
35.
Louisville
.603
8
5
.535
46
 
88.
Colorado State
.433
7
6
.411
109
36.
Purdue
.603
7
6
.580
14
 
89.
Colorado
.430
5
7
.480
77
37.
Iowa State
.602
8
5
.534
47
 
90.
UAB
.429
8
5
.363
129
38.
San Diego State
.602
10
3
.436
94
 
91.
Air Force
.417
5
7
.466
81
39.
Fresno State
.593
10
4
.462
83
 
92.
Buffalo
.416
6
6
.416
106
40.
Toledo
.592
11
3
.415
107
 
93.
Arkansas State
.415
7
5
.368
126
41.
Florida State
.587
7
6
.565
23
 
94.
Georgia State
.415
7
5
.367
127
42.
Navy
.571
7
6
.548
35
 
95.
Utah State
.404
6
7
.427
99
43.
Kentucky
.568
7
6
.546
37
 
96.
New Mexico State
.400
7
6
.378
123
44.
Kansas State
.564
8
5
.495
72
 
97.
Cincinnati
.398
4
8
.498
69
45.
Texas
.564
7
6
.541
41
 
98.
UTSA
.396
6
5
.370
125
46.
Texas A&M
.564
7
6
.541
42
 
99.
North Carolina
.388
3
9
.541
40
47.
Arizona State
.563
7
6
.540
43
 
100.
Eastern Michigan
.388
5
7
.436
93
48.
North Texas
.547
9
5
.461
86
 
101.
Illinois
.374
2
10
.582
13
49.
Missouri
.546
7
6
.523
54
 
102.
Old Dominion
.371
5
7
.418
103
50.
Duke
.545
7
6
.522
55
 
103.
Western Kentucky
.370
6
7
.392
119
51.
Maryland
.543
4
8
.640
1
 
104.
Miami, Ohio
.361
5
7
.408
112
52.
Houston
.542
7
5
.492
74
 
105.
East Carolina
.360
3
9
.511
63
53.
West Virginia
.540
7
6
.517
57
 
106.
UNLV
.356
5
7
.403
115
54.
Oregon
.538
7
6
.515
59
 
107.
BYU
.356
4
9
.469
80
55.
Georgia Tech
.531
5
6
.558
27
 
108.
Connecticut
.356
3
9
.506
66
56.
Utah
.530
7
6
.507
65
 
109.
LA Monroe
.336
4
8
.431
96
57.
Minnesota
.528
5
7
.577
17
 
110.
Nevada
.326
3
9
.473
78
58.
UCLA
.524
6
7
.547
36
 
111.
Louisiana 
.320
5
7
.366
128
59.
Mississippi
.524
6
6
.524
53
 
112.
South Alabama
.316
4
8
.410
110
60.
Indiana
.522
5
7
.572
20
 
113.
Massachusetts
.314
4
8
.407
113
61.
SMU
.519
7
6
.496
70
 
114.
Tulsa
.310
2
10
.512
62
62.
Temple
.515
7
6
.492
73
 
115.
New Mexico
.305
3
9
.449
89
63.
Texas Tech
.512
6
7
.535
45
 
116.
Idaho
.299
4
8
.390
121
64.
Nebraska
.510
4
8
.609
3
 
117.
Kansas
.278
1
11
.536
44
65.
Florida
.507
4
7
.589
10
 
118.
Baylor
.276
1
11
.533
48
66.
Ohio
.506
9
4
.390
120
 
119.
Bowling Green
.272
2
10
.465
82
67.
Arizona
.504
7
6
.481
76
 
120.
Oregon State
.270
1
11
.526
52
68.
Virginia
.504
6
7
.527
51
 
121.
Hawaii
.267
3
9
.404
114
69.
Appalachian St.
.501
9
4
.386
122
 
122.
Kent State
.265
2
10
.457
87
70.
Northern Illinois
.497
8
5
.427
98
 
123.
San Jose State
.246
2
11
.442
90
71.
Marshall
.492
8
5
.423
100
 
124.
Coastal Carolina
.244
3
9
.374
124
72.
Vanderbilt
.492
5
7
.542
39
 
125.
Ball State
.234
2
10
.416
105
73.
Fla. International
.492
8
5
.423
101
 
126.
Georgia Southern
.233
2
10
.415
108
74.
Wyoming
.490
8
5
.421
102
 
127.
Rice
.229
1
11
.471
79
75.
Pittsburgh
.482
5
7
.532
49
 
128.
Texas State
.220
2
10
.396
117
76.
Rutgers
.477
4
8
.578
15
 
129.
Charlotte
.208
1
11
.441
91
77.
Central Michigan
.477
8
5
.408
111
 
130.
UTEP
.181
0
12
.469
130
78.
Syracuse
.468
4
8
.569
21
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2018 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved