Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Clemson Remains #1

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • Roughly two-thirds of the way through the regular season, only 4 undefeated teams remain
  • The SEC has 5 teams in the top-10, while the Pac-12 has 3 teams in the top-40
  • (6-2) Army cracks the top-25—along with (7-1) Buffalo, whose only loss is to Army
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 29

Oct. 22 Rankings
Oct. 15 Rankings
Oct. 8 Rankings

Final 2017-18 Rankings
Final 17 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Clemson
.820
8
0
.533
39
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Notre Dame
.818
8
0
.529
42
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Alabama
.809
8
0
.514
53
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Georgia
.806
7
1
.612
6
1-1
1-0
0
5.
LSU
.798
7
1
.599
10
1-1
1-0
0
6.
Michigan
.788
7
1
.586
13
0-1
0-0
0
7.
Kentucky
.778
7
1
.570
19
1-0
2-1
0
8.
Oklahoma
.769
7
1
.557
25
0-0
2-1
0
9.
Florida
.766
6
2
.638
2
1-2
0-0
0
10.
Ohio State
.741
7
1
.520
48
0-0
1-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. UCF
.728
7
0
.401
120
  Southeastern
.656
36
5
.417
12. West Virginia
.725
6
1
.514
54
  Big 12
.590
21
7
.437
13. Penn State
.703
6
2
.560
22
  Big Ten
.582
28
13
.471
14. Iowa
.702
6
2
.559
23
  Atlantic Coast
.575
32
13
.446
15. Washington St.
.702
7
1
.472
84
  Pac-12
.544
23
11
.437
16. Texas
.698
6
2
.554
27
  American Athletic
.461
25
21
.435
17. South Carolina
.694
4
3
.656
1
  Sun Belt
.454
21
18
.431
18. Mississippi St.
.684
5
3
.616
5
  Mountain West
.447
25
22
.428
19. Utah
.683
6
2
.537
35
  Mid-American
.430
18
29
.501
20. Fresno State
.681
7
1
.447
99
  Conference USA
.389
21
28
.431
21. Texas A&M
.679
5
3
.610
7
  *non-conference play
22. N.C. State
.665
5
2
.540
32
 
23. Iowa State
.665
4
3
.626
3
 
24. Army
.662
6
2
.513
55
 
25. Buffalo
.661
7
1
.425
110
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Michigan State
.660
5
3
.589
12
 
79.
TCU
.499
3
5
.575
15
27.
Cincinnati
.659
7
1
.422
112
 
80.
Kansas State
.494
3
5
.569
20
28.
Syracuse
.655
6
2
.506
60
 
81.
Hawaii
.492
6
4
.432
105
29.
Georgia Southern
.655
7
1
.419
114
 
82.
Akron
.480
4
3
.438
103
30.
Stanford
.650
5
3
.579
14
 
83.
Toledo
.477
4
4
.477
77
31.
Houston
.648
7
1
.411
116
 
84.
Arizona
.476
4
5
.510
58
32.
Boston College
.643
6
2
.492
67
 
85.
Louisiana 
.476
4
4
.476
80
33.
Virginia
.640
6
2
.489
72
 
86.
Ohio
.473
5
3
.399
124
34.
South Florida
.637
7
1
.400
121
 
87.
Liberty
.467
4
3
.425
109
35.
UAB
.634
7
1
.396
125
 
88.
Eastern Michigan
.463
4
5
.497
64
36.
Utah State
.632
7
1
.395
127
 
89.
Arkansas State
.452
4
4
.452
97
37.
Northwestern
.630
5
3
.557
24
 
90.
UCLA
.448
2
6
.602
9
38.
Boise State
.629
6
2
.477
79
 
91.
SMU
.448
3
5
.523
46
39.
Texas Tech
.621
5
3
.547
29
 
92.
LA Monroe
.447
4
4
.447
100
40.
San Diego State
.614
6
2
.461
92
 
93.
Florida Atlantic
.422
3
5
.497
63
41.
Washington
.614
6
3
.515
52
 
94.
Memphis
.417
4
4
.417
115
42.
Maryland
.612
5
3
.539
33
 
95.
Illinois
.415
3
5
.490
70
43.
Auburn
.611
5
3
.537
34
 
96.
Charlotte
.406
4
4
.406
119
44.
Duke
.610
5
3
.537
36
 
97.
Kansas
.406
3
5
.480
74
45.
Mississippi
.601
5
3
.527
44
 
98.
Tulane
.405
3
5
.479
76
46.
Miami, Fla.
.599
5
3
.525
45
 
99.
Wyoming
.405
3
6
.505
61
47.
Oklahoma State
.594
5
3
.519
49
 
100.
Nebraska
.399
2
6
.553
28
48.
Appalachian St.
.593
5
2
.463
90
 
101.
Miami, Ohio
.395
3
5
.469
87
49.
Louisiana Tech
.592
6
2
.438
102
 
102.
Massachusetts
.391
3
6
.491
69
50.
Missouri
.591
4
4
.591
11
 
103.
Air Force
.381
3
5
.454
96
51.
Wisconsin
.590
5
3
.515
51
 
104.
Oregon State
.371
2
6
.523
47
52.
Vanderbilt
.585
4
5
.617
4
 
105.
Southern Miss
.368
3
4
.409
118
53.
Troy
.578
6
2
.425
108
 
106.
Arkansas
.364
2
7
.534
38
54.
Purdue
.571
4
4
.571
16
 
107.
New Mexico
.361
3
5
.434
104
55.
Pittsburgh
.571
4
4
.571
17
 
108.
Louisville
.359
2
6
.510
56
56.
Northern Illinois
.567
5
3
.492
68
 
109.
East Carolina
.359
2
5
.486
73
57.
North Texas
.567
7
2
.395
126
 
110.
Colorado State
.358
3
6
.456
95
58.
USC
.560
4
4
.560
21
 
111.
Navy
.344
2
6
.493
66
59.
Coastal Carolina
.546
5
3
.471
85
 
112.
UTSA
.340
3
5
.410
117
60.
Arizona State
.546
4
4
.546
30
 
113.
North Carolina
.333
1
6
.555
26
61.
Minnesota
.546
4
4
.546
31
 
114.
South Alabama
.329
2
6
.477
78
62.
Temple
.544
5
3
.469
86
 
115.
Ball State
.327
3
6
.421
113
63.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.543
5
3
.467
88
 
116.
Georgia State
.326
2
6
.473
81
64.
Fla. International
.542
6
2
.390
129
 
117.
Rutgers
.301
1
7
.532
41
65.
Oregon
.538
5
3
.462
91
 
118.
Connecticut
.299
1
7
.529
43
66.
Indiana
.537
4
5
.570
18
 
119.
Old Dominion
.284
2
7
.443
101
67.
Baylor
.535
4
4
.535
37
 
120.
Tulsa
.276
1
7
.501
62
68.
Colorado
.534
5
3
.458
93
 
121.
New Mexico State
.270
2
7
.425
107
69.
Florida State
.533
4
4
.533
40
 
122.
Central Michigan
.264
1
8
.496
65
70.
California
.532
5
3
.457
94
 
123.
UNLV
.256
2
6
.391
128
71.
Tennessee
.530
3
5
.604
8
 
124.
San Jose State
.253
1
7
.472
83
72.
Marshall
.529
5
2
.399
123
 
125.
Texas State
.253
2
6
.386
130
73.
Western Michigan
.524
6
3
.423
111
 
126.
Bowling Green
.247
1
7
.464
89
74.
Nevada
.523
5
4
.490
71
 
127.
Rice
.246
1
8
.473
82
75.
Virginia Tech
.523
4
3
.480
75
 
128.
Kent State
.235
1
7
.448
98
76.
Wake Forest
.518
4
4
.518
50
 
129.
Western Kentucky
.201
1
7
.399
122
77.
BYU
.510
4
4
.510
57
 
130.
UTEP
.156
0
8
.425
106
78.
Georgia Tech
.507
4
4
.507
59
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2018 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved