Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Only 8 Undefeated Teams Remain

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • Half of the top-10 have a loss
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 15

October 8 Rankings
Final 2017-18 Rankings
Final 17 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Clemson .825 6 0 .541 31 0-0 1-0 0
2.
Notre Dame .824 7 0 .539 33 0-0 2-0 0
3.
Alabama .815 7 0 .523 43 0-0 1-0 0
4.
Ohio State .809 7 0 .514 49 0-0 0-0 0
5.
LSU .781 6 1 .588 9 0-1 1-0 0
6.
Florida .780 6 1 .587 10 1-1 1-0 0
7.
N.C. State .778 5 0 .467 84 0-0 0-0 0
8.
Texas .776 6 1 .581 12 1-0 1-0 1
9.
Oklahoma .771 5 1 .591 7 0-1 0-0 0
10.
Kentucky .763 5 1 .580 14 1-0 1-1 0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Michigan .762 6 1 .561 18   Southeastern .652 34 5 .418
12. Georgia .761 6 1 .559 21   Big 12 .604 21 7 .451
13. UCF .737 6 0 .412 118   Big Ten .591 27 13 .485
14. Cincinnati .732 6 0 .405 122   Atlantic Coast .577 32 13 .448
15. Iowa .728 5 1 .535 36   Pac-12 .548 23 11 .441
16. South Florida .712 6 0 .382 130   American Athletic .485 25 17 .428
17. Duke .711 5 1 .513 50   Mountain West .455 25 22 .436
18. Texas A&M .705 5 2 .585 11   Sun Belt .446 18 18 .446
19. West Virginia .701 5 1 .501 55   Mid-American .421 17 27 .489
20. Stanford .696 4 2 .604 4   Conference USA .398 21 28 .440
21. San Diego State .687 5 1 .484 71   *non-conference play
22. USC .674 4 2 .579 15  
23. Colorado .659 5 1 .453 91  
24. Mississippi State .656 4 2 .560 20  
25. Michigan State .654 4 2 .558 22  
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Washington .649 5 2 .522 44  
79.
Coastal Carolina .479 3 3 .479 77
27.
Army .649 4 2 .552 24  
80.
Georgia Tech .479 3 4 .522 45
28.
Penn State .645 4 2 .548 26  
81.
Florida Atlantic .476 3 3 .476 79
29.
Mississippi .644 5 2 .517 47  
82.
Liberty .471 3 3 .471 83
30.
South Carolina .643 3 3 .643 1  
83.
Memphis .460 4 3 .417 113
31.
Maryland .642 4 2 .545 29  
84.
Louisiana  .457 3 3 .457 87
32.
Buffalo .638 6 1 .413 117  
85.
Arizona .452 3 4 .495 61
33.
Texas Tech .634 4 2 .536 35  
86.
California .451 3 3 .451 94
34.
Fresno State .633 5 1 .425 106  
87.
Eastern Michigan .450 3 4 .493 63
35.
Georgia Southern .626 5 1 .418 111  
88.
Illinois .449 3 3 .449 95
36.
Washington State .625 5 1 .417 114  
89.
Ohio .445 3 3 .445 99
37.
Oregon .624 5 1 .416 115  
90.
LA Monroe .436 3 4 .478 78
38.
Utah State .623 5 1 .415 116  
91.
Tulane .432 2 4 .533 38
39.
Miami, Fla. .620 5 2 .491 65  
92.
SMU .432 2 4 .533 39
40.
Utah .619 4 2 .520 46  
93.
Toledo .429 3 3 .429 104
41.
UAB .619 5 1 .411 120  
94.
Akron .425 2 3 .484 72
42.
Virginia .615 4 2 .516 48  
95.
Miami, Ohio .421 3 4 .464 85
43.
Indiana .612 4 3 .570 17  
96.
Colorado State .414 3 4 .456 88
44.
Appalachian St. .610 4 1 .424 108  
97.
UCLA .406 1 5 .614 2
45.
North Texas .609 6 1 .383 129  
98.
New Mexico .404 3 3 .404 123
46.
Iowa State .608 3 3 .608 3  
99.
Nevada .399 3 4 .441 102
47.
Wisconsin .605 4 2 .505 54  
100.
Georgia State .388 2 4 .487 68
48.
Houston .605 5 1 .396 126  
101.
Ball State .387 3 4 .428 105
49.
Boston College .604 5 2 .474 81  
102.
Charlotte .386 3 3 .386 128
50.
Syracuse .595 4 2 .495 62  
103.
UTSA .382 3 4 .424 107
51.
TCU .592 3 3 .592 6  
104.
Massachusetts .372 2 5 .500 57
52.
Louisiana Tech .587 4 2 .486 70  
105.
Louisville .370 2 5 .499 58
53.
Virginia Tech .583 4 2 .482 74  
106.
Southern Miss .363 2 3 .420 109
54.
Boise State .582 4 2 .482 75  
107.
Wyoming .361 2 5 .489 67
55.
Minnesota .581 3 3 .581 13  
108.
Air Force .354 2 4 .451 93
56.
Western Michigan .576 5 2 .446 98  
109.
Arkansas .347 1 6 .571 16
57.
Baylor .571 4 3 .529 40  
110.
East Carolina .346 2 4 .442 100
58.
Auburn .568 4 3 .525 42  
111.
Kansas .346 2 4 .442 101
59.
Missouri .561 3 3 .561 19  
112.
UNLV .342 2 4 .438 103
60.
Vanderbilt .559 3 4 .601 5  
113.
Tulsa .342 1 5 .548 27
61.
Northwestern .556 3 3 .556 23  
114.
New Mexico State .332 2 5 .457 86
62.
Hawaii .553 6 2 .400 125  
115.
South Alabama .330 2 5 .454 90
63.
Troy .550 5 2 .419 110  
116.
Connecticut .330 1 5 .534 37
64.
Fla. International .548 4 2 .447 97  
117.
North Carolina .329 1 4 .510 51
65.
BYU .544 4 3 .501 56  
118.
Navy .323 2 4 .418 112
66.
Wake Forest .543 3 3 .543 30  
119.
Rutgers .310 1 6 .529 41
67.
Arizona State .540 3 3 .540 32  
120.
Oregon State .304 1 5 .505 53
68.
Tennessee .537 3 3 .537 34  
121.
Central Michigan .278 1 6 .491 64
69.
Oklahoma State .526 4 3 .483 73  
122.
Bowling Green .266 1 6 .475 80
70.
Northern Illinois .524 4 3 .481 76  
123.
Nebraska .265 0 6 .590 8
71.
Marshall .512 4 2 .412 119  
124.
Old Dominion .263 1 6 .472 82
72.
Pittsburgh .507 3 4 .550 25  
125.
Kent State .251 1 6 .456 89
73.
Kansas State .504 3 4 .547 28  
126.
Rice .248 1 6 .451 92
74.
Mid. Tenn. St. .498 3 3 .498 59  
127.
Western Kentucky .226 1 5 .406 121
75.
Purdue .497 3 3 .497 60  
128.
Texas State .217 1 5 .393 127
76.
Temple .492 4 3 .449 96  
129.
San Jose State .205 0 6 .508 52
77.
Arkansas State .491 3 3 .491 66  
130.
UTEP .144 0 6 .403 124
78.
Florida State .487 3 3 .487 69  
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2018 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved