Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Notre Dame and Florida Are #1-2

  • #1 Notre Dame caps a perfect regular season with a win in the Coliseum
  • #2 Florida, which has gone 11-1 versus the nation's 10th-toughest schedule to date, is the only team in the country that has beaten 4 teams in the the current top-25 (#10 South Carolina, #11 LSU, #13 Texas A&M, and #23 Florida State)
  • Undefeated Ohio State is #3
  • (10-1) Kansas State — the only team aside from Notre Dame that has a winning record versus the current top-10 — is #4, having played the hardest schedule to date of any 1-loss team except for Florida
  • #5 Georgia (.785 rating) edges #6 Alabama (.784), #7 Oregon (.784), and #8 Stanford (.781)
  • A 4-0 week in non-conference play moves the SEC back to the top of the conference rankings
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 25

Nov. 18 Rankings
Nov. 11 Rankings
Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Notre Dame
.836
12
0
.561
30
2-0
1-0
0
2.
Florida
.816
11
1
.597
10
1-1
3-0
0
3.
Ohio State
.811
12
0
.518
51
0-0
3-0
0
4.
Kansas State
.790
10
1
.562
29
1-0
1-0
1
5.
Georgia
.785
11
1
.550
34
1-1
0-0
0
6.
Alabama
.784
11
1
.548
36
0-0
2-1
0
7.
Oregon
.784
11
1
.547
38
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Stanford
.781
10
2
.604
5
1-1
2-0
1
9.
Oklahoma
.764
9
2
.591
16
0-2
2-0
0
10.
South Carolina
.760
10
2
.575
20
1-1
1-1
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. LSU
.754
10
2
.568
23
  Southeastern
.631
48
8
.406
12. Nebraska
.748
10
2
.560
31
  Big 12
.617
26
4
.385
13. Texas A&M
.741
10
2
.551
33
  Pac-12
.597
24
11
.484
14. Oregon State
.725
8
3
.601
7
  Big Ten
.577
34
14
.450
15. Texas
.707
8
3
.580
19
  Big East
.499
25
14
.414
16. UCLA
.691
9
3
.546
40
  Atlantic Coast
.494
27
21
.456
17. Clemson
.690
10
2
.488
61
  Mid-American
.438
26
26
.438
18. Michigan
.682
8
4
.588
17
  Sun Belt
.434
17
23
.479
19. Oklahoma State
.682
7
4
.606
3
  WAC
.424
22
20
.410
20. Northwestern
.674
9
3
.527
46
  Mountain West
.390
17
24
.440
21. Kent State
.672
11
1
.406
112
  Conference USA
.371
12
36
.523
22. San Jose State
.668
10
2
.463
74
  *non-conference play
23. Florida State
.666
10
2
.461
75
 
24. Northern Illinois
.646
11
1
.379
122
 
25. Penn State
.645
8
4
.548
37
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
TCU
.645
7
4
.566
26
 
76.
Duke
.464
6
6
.464
73
27.
Vanderbilt
.644
8
4
.547
39
 
77.
Iowa
.464
4
8
.564
27
28.
Arizona
.642
7
5
.594
12
 
78.
UTSA
.450
8
4
.353
124
29.
Rutgers
.640
9
2
.443
92
 
79.
Wake Forest
.448
5
7
.498
55
30.
USC
.639
7
5
.592
15
 
80.
California
.446
3
9
.599
8
31.
Utah State
.628
10
2
.420
107
 
81.
Auburn
.441
3
9
.594
13
32.
Ball State
.625
9
3
.472
70
 
82.
Central Michigan
.435
6
6
.435
99
33.
Texas Tech
.622
7
5
.574
21
 
83.
Connecticut
.434
5
6
.461
76
34.
West Virginia
.621
6
5
.595
11
 
84.
Indiana
.433
4
8
.534
43
35.
Mississippi State
.620
8
4
.521
49
 
85.
SMU
.419
6
6
.419
109
36.
Louisville
.617
9
2
.419
108
 
86.
Air Force
.412
6
6
.412
111
37.
Washington
.616
7
5
.568
24
 
87.
Temple
.405
4
7
.486
63
38.
Baylor
.613
6
5
.586
18
 
88.
Virginia
.403
4
8
.504
54
39.
Iowa State
.603
6
6
.603
6
 
89.
Troy
.401
5
7
.450
83
40.
Boise State
.603
9
2
.404
113
 
90.
Rice
.397
6
6
.397
117
41.
Cincinnati
.598
8
3
.460
77
 
91.
Kentucky
.396
2
10
.604
4
42.
Wisconsin
.598
7
5
.549
35
 
92.
South Florida
.391
3
8
.530
44
43.
Michigan State
.597
6
6
.597
9
 
93.
Washington State
.386
3
9
.539
42
44.
Toledo
.594
9
3
.440
94
 
94.
Miami, Ohio
.382
4
8
.481
64
45.
Arkansas State
.585
8
3
.446
89
 
95.
North Texas
.381
4
8
.480
65
46.
Louisiana Tech
.585
9
3
.431
101
 
96.
Buffalo
.379
4
8
.478
67
47.
Fresno State
.584
9
3
.430
102
 
97.
Houston
.368
5
7
.416
110
48.
Arizona State
.578
7
5
.528
45
 
98.
Maryland
.359
4
8
.457
80
49.
San Diego State
.577
9
3
.424
104
 
99.
Kansas
.358
1
10
.620
1
50.
Syracuse
.571
7
5
.521
50
 
100.
Marshall
.356
5
7
.403
114
51.
Missouri
.570
5
7
.619
2
 
101.
Western Michigan
.353
4
8
.450
84
52.
Mississippi
.569
6
6
.569
22
 
102.
Illinois
.350
2
10
.557
32
53.
Miami, Fla.
.564
7
5
.514
52
 
103.
Wyoming
.348
4
8
.445
90
54.
Navy
.559
7
4
.477
68
 
104.
Colorado State
.340
4
8
.436
98
55.
Tulsa
.552
9
3
.399
116
 
105.
Florida Atlantic
.339
3
8
.474
69
56.
Central Florida
.547
9
3
.394
118
 
106.
Texas State
.336
3
8
.469
72
57.
North Carolina
.546
8
4
.444
91
 
107.
Boston College
.319
2
10
.522
48
58.
LA Monroe
.540
8
4
.439
96
 
108.
Fla. International
.312
3
9
.457
79
59.
BYU
.537
7
5
.487
62
 
109.
New Mexico
.312
4
9
.420
106
60.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.532
8
3
.393
119
 
110.
Colorado
.301
1
11
.564
28
61.
LA Lafayette
.530
7
4
.448
88
 
111.
UTEP
.298
3
9
.441
93
62.
Purdue
.527
6
6
.527
47
 
112.
Eastern Michigan
.294
2
10
.493
59
63.
Bowling Green
.524
8
4
.423
105
 
113.
Memphis
.294
4
8
.384
121
64.
Tennessee
.517
5
7
.567
25
 
114.
Army
.291
2
9
.478
66
65.
Minnesota
.514
6
6
.514
53
 
115.
UAB
.284
3
9
.424
103
66.
N.C. State
.505
7
5
.455
81
 
116.
Hawaii
.267
2
9
.449
86
67.
Ohio
.501
8
4
.401
115
 
117.
South Alabama
.259
2
10
.449
87
68.
Virginia Tech
.495
6
6
.495
57
 
118.
Tulane
.252
2
10
.440
95
69.
Georgia Tech
.493
6
6
.493
58
 
119.
UNLV
.243
2
11
.437
97
70.
Arkansas
.492
4
8
.592
14
 
120.
Idaho
.243
1
11
.490
60
71.
Utah
.489
5
7
.539
41
 
121.
Massachusetts
.228
1
11
.469
71
72.
Western Kentucky
.482
7
5
.432
100
 
122.
Akron
.219
1
11
.458
78
73.
East Carolina
.477
8
4
.378
123
 
123.
New Mexico State
.218
1
10
.449
85
74.
Pittsburgh
.469
5
6
.497
56
 
124.
Southern Miss
.171
0
12
.452
82
75.
Nevada
.467
7
4
.386
120
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved