Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Florida Remains #1

  • The (6-0) Gators, who handed #18 LSU and #19 Texas A&M their only losses to date, have accomplished the most of any team so far
  • (6-0) Kansas St., which won at #16 Oklahoma, is the 2nd-most accomplished team to date
  • #3 Notre Dame, #4 Oregon St., #5 Alabama round out the top-5
  • #9 South Carolina is the highest-ranked 1-loss team
  • #14 Stanford, 4-2 against the nation's 2nd-toughest schedule to date, is the top-ranked 2-loss team
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 14

Oct. 7 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida
.846
6
0
.578
10
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Kansas State
.837
6
0
.562
15
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Notre Dame
.827
6
0
.544
23
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Oregon State
.825
5
0
.541
25
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Alabama
.806
6
0
.509
44
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Ohio State
.803
7
0
.504
50
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Oregon
.785
6
0
.476
70
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Mississippi State
.761
6
0
.443
95
0-0
0-0
0
9.
South Carolina
.758
6
1
.556
17
0-0
1-1
0
10.
Texas Tech
.757
5
1
.572
12
0-0
2-1
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Rutgers
.747
6
0
.424
105
  Big 12
.652
26
3
.400
12. West Virginia
.739
5
1
.548
20
  Southeastern
.632
31
7
.436
13. USC
.735
5
1
.543
24
  Big Ten
.592
34
13
.456
14. Stanford
.731
4
2
.644
2
  Pac-12
.579
24
10
.453
15. Georgia
.730
5
1
.537
29
  Big East
.530
21
10
.423
16. Oklahoma
.727
4
1
.556
16
  Atlantic Coast
.499
26
14
.409
17. Louisville
.723
6
0
.395
115
  WAC
.454
20
16
.421
18. LSU
.717
6
1
.503
52
  Sun Belt
.445
16
19
.471
19. Texas A&M
.716
5
1
.519
39
  Mid-American
.427
22
24
.440
20. Iowa State
.697
4
2
.605
6
  Mountain West
.403
17
23
.447
21. Boise State
.694
5
1
.492
59
  Conference USA
.384
12
34
.529
22. Cincinnati
.692
5
0
.359
120
  *non-conference play
23. Northwestern
.681
6
1
.460
84
 
24. Ohio
.679
7
0
.345
122
 
25. Western Kentucky
.678
5
1
.474
73
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Louisiana Tech
.666
5
1
.461
83
 
76.
Houston
.477
3
3
.477
69
27.
Texas
.661
4
2
.565
14
 
77.
Wake Forest
.472
3
3
.472
74
28.
TCU
.660
5
1
.454
88
 
78.
Texas State
.465
3
3
.465
79
29.
Tulsa
.648
6
1
.424
106
 
79.
East Carolina
.458
4
3
.416
108
30.
UCLA
.647
5
2
.520
38
 
80.
UTSA
.453
5
1
.262
124
31.
Florida State
.640
6
1
.416
109
 
81.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.442
4
2
.345
123
32.
Arizona State
.637
5
1
.430
100
 
82.
Connecticut
.441
3
4
.484
66
33.
Clemson
.637
5
1
.429
101
 
83.
Utah
.438
2
4
.539
27
34.
Penn State
.635
4
2
.537
28
 
84.
San Diego State
.437
4
3
.396
114
35.
Northern Illinois
.632
6
1
.407
111
 
85.
Kentucky
.435
1
6
.658
1
36.
Iowa
.621
4
2
.523
34
 
86.
Syracuse
.434
2
4
.535
30
37.
Michigan
.621
4
2
.522
35
 
87.
Miami, Ohio
.431
3
4
.474
72
38.
Wisconsin
.621
5
2
.492
60
 
88.
South Florida
.431
2
4
.532
32
39.
Arizona
.616
3
3
.616
4
 
89.
Central Michigan
.420
2
4
.521
37
40.
Michigan State
.613
4
3
.571
13
 
90.
Illinois
.410
2
5
.540
26
41.
Toledo
.610
6
1
.385
117
 
91.
North Texas
.407
2
4
.508
45
42.
Nevada
.608
6
1
.383
118
 
92.
Indiana
.405
2
4
.505
48
43.
Nebraska
.607
4
2
.507
46
 
93.
Marshall
.399
2
4
.499
54
44.
North Carolina
.589
5
2
.459
86
 
94.
Auburn
.398
1
5
.606
5
45.
LA Lafayette
.588
4
1
.402
113
 
95.
Virginia
.391
2
5
.521
36
46.
Washington
.587
3
3
.587
9
 
96.
SMU
.384
2
4
.483
67
47.
Miami, Fla.
.576
4
3
.533
31
 
97.
Western Michigan
.383
3
4
.425
104
48.
N.C. State
.569
4
2
.468
78
 
98.
Washington State
.375
2
5
.504
51
49.
Kent State
.567
5
1
.359
121
 
99.
Pittsburgh
.371
2
4
.470
76
50.
Baylor
.564
3
2
.504
49
 
100.
Georgia Tech
.370
2
4
.469
77
51.
Duke
.563
5
2
.432
99
 
101.
Air Force
.368
3
3
.368
119
52.
Mississippi
.560
4
3
.518
40
 
102.
UAB
.342
1
5
.548
19
53.
LA Monroe
.560
4
2
.459
85
 
103.
Tulane
.341
1
5
.547
21
54.
Utah State
.558
5
2
.427
103
 
104.
Rice
.336
2
5
.462
82
55.
Central Florida
.554
4
2
.453
89
 
105.
Kansas
.327
1
5
.531
33
56.
Minnesota
.554
4
2
.453
90
 
106.
Buffalo
.311
1
5
.513
41
57.
Missouri
.550
3
4
.592
7
 
107.
Florida Atlantic
.309
1
5
.510
43
58.
Oklahoma State
.550
3
2
.490
62
 
108.
Boston College
.300
1
5
.500
53
59.
San Jose State
.547
4
2
.446
94
 
109.
Hawaii
.293
1
5
.491
61
60.
Tennessee
.547
3
3
.547
22
 
110.
UTEP
.291
1
6
.506
47
61.
BYU
.538
4
3
.495
56
 
111.
South Alabama
.288
1
5
.485
64
62.
Temple
.535
3
2
.475
71
 
112.
Fla. International
.276
1
6
.488
63
63.
Arkansas
.531
3
4
.573
11
 
113.
Southern Miss
.263
0
6
.588
8
64.
New Mexico
.528
4
3
.485
65
 
114.
UNLV
.256
1
6
.463
80
65.
Vanderbilt
.525
2
4
.624
3
 
115.
Akron
.256
1
6
.462
81
66.
Maryland
.520
4
2
.419
107
 
116.
Wyoming
.253
1
5
.441
96
67.
Virginia Tech
.514
4
3
.471
75
 
117.
Colorado
.250
1
5
.437
97
68.
California
.511
3
4
.554
18
 
118.
Army
.242
1
5
.427
102
69.
Navy
.511
3
3
.511
42
 
119.
Idaho
.236
1
6
.436
98
70.
Ball State
.502
4
3
.459
87
 
120.
Memphis
.227
1
5
.407
112
71.
Fresno State
.494
4
3
.451
91
 
121.
Colorado State
.220
1
6
.414
110
72.
Purdue
.494
3
3
.494
57
 
122.
New Mexico State
.219
1
5
.395
116
73.
Troy
.494
3
3
.494
58
 
123.
Massachusetts
.197
0
6
.495
55
74.
Arkansas State
.492
4
3
.449
92
 
124.
Eastern Michigan
.188
0
6
.481
68
75.
Bowling Green
.490
4
3
.448
93
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved