Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Beavers, Gators, and Irish Lead the Pack

  • Oregon State — which has wins over #24 UCLA, #31 Arizona, and #47 Wisconsin (with 2 of those on the road) — premieres at #1, having accomplished the most of any team to date
  • #2 Florida, #3 Notre Dame, #4 Texas Tech, and #5 Georgia, all of which have posted road wins against the current top-40, round out the initial top-5
  • The Big 12 and SEC pick up where they left off — as the top two conferences
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 3

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oregon State
.871
3
0
.628
3
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Florida
.820
4
0
.532
19
0-0
0-0
0
3.
Notre Dame
.816
4
0
.526
25
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Texas Tech
.815
4
0
.524
28
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Georgia
.812
5
0
.518
35
0-0
0-0
0
6.
South Carolina
.811
5
0
.517
36
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Ohio State
.798
5
0
.497
48
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Alabama
.794
5
0
.490
51
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Texas
.786
4
0
.478
59
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Kansas State
.778
4
0
.467
64
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Oregon
.767
5
0
.452
75
  Big 12
.657
26
3
.404
12. West Virginia
.767
4
0
.451
76
  Southeastern
.620
30
7
.427
13. Louisiana Tech
.756
4
0
.437
83
  Big Ten
.592
34
13
.455
14. Florida State
.748
5
0
.426
94
  Pac-12
.571
23
9
.437
15. Mississippi State
.743
4
0
.419
102
  Atlantic Coast
.514
26
12
.402
16. LSU
.743
5
0
.419
103
  Big East
.511
19
10
.417
17. Stanford
.742
3
1
.608
5
  WAC
.475
19
12
.408
18. Northwestern
.737
5
0
.411
107
  Sun Belt
.447
15
18
.474
19. Louisville
.731
5
0
.404
113
  Mid-American
.434
21
22
.441
20. Cincinnati
.721
3
0
.393
114
  Mountain West
.393
15
21
.442
21. TCU
.710
4
0
.379
117
  Conference USA
.362
9
32
.534
22. Rutgers
.697
4
0
.365
119
  *non-conference play
23. Ohio
.694
5
0
.362
120
 
24. UCLA
.682
4
1
.503
44
 
25. Clemson
.679
4
1
.499
47
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Iowa State
.678
3
1
.531
20
 
76.
North Carolina
.471
3
2
.411
108
27.
Boise State
.675
3
1
.528
22
 
77.
Utah
.470
2
2
.470
61
28.
Washington
.674
3
1
.527
23
 
78.
North Texas
.465
2
3
.525
27
29.
USC
.665
3
1
.517
37
 
79.
Auburn
.463
1
3
.615
4
30.
Miami, Fla.
.665
4
1
.483
55
 
80.
Virginia
.453
2
3
.513
38
31.
Arizona
.655
3
2
.599
7
 
81.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.452
3
1
.308
123
32.
Western Kentucky
.653
4
1
.469
63
 
82.
Vanderbilt
.450
1
3
.603
6
33.
Arizona State
.650
4
1
.467
65
 
83.
Illinois
.444
2
3
.504
41
34.
Michigan State
.644
3
2
.587
8
 
84.
Marshall
.443
2
3
.503
42
35.
Nebraska
.636
4
1
.451
77
 
85.
Indiana
.427
2
2
.427
91
36.
Texas A&M
.631
3
1
.480
58
 
86.
Pittsburgh
.421
2
2
.421
98
37.
Missouri
.627
3
2
.570
10
 
87.
Arkansas State
.410
2
3
.470
62
38.
Baylor
.616
3
1
.463
69
 
88.
Georgia Tech
.407
2
3
.466
66
39.
Duke
.612
4
1
.426
92
 
89.
Bowling Green
.406
2
3
.466
67
40.
San Jose State
.608
4
1
.422
97
 
90.
Boston College
.398
1
3
.551
11
41.
Tulsa
.606
4
1
.420
100
 
91.
Western Michigan
.397
2
3
.456
73
42.
Toledo
.603
4
1
.416
104
 
92.
Houston
.395
1
3
.548
14
43.
Minnesota
.595
4
1
.409
110
 
93.
Navy
.383
1
3
.536
17
44.
Nevada
.595
4
1
.409
111
 
94.
San Diego State
.378
2
3
.436
86
45.
Kent State
.590
3
1
.437
85
 
95.
SMU
.374
1
3
.526
26
46.
UTSA
.587
5
0
.262
124
 
96.
Maryland
.361
2
2
.361
121
47.
Wisconsin
.579
3
2
.520
32
 
97.
Syracuse
.360
1
3
.511
40
48.
Tennessee
.579
3
2
.519
33
 
98.
California
.357
1
4
.542
15
49.
Utah State
.578
4
1
.392
115
 
99.
Washington State
.354
2
3
.411
109
50.
Purdue
.577
3
1
.423
96
 
100.
Air Force
.345
2
2
.345
122
51.
LA Lafayette
.573
3
1
.419
101
 
101.
Florida Atlantic
.344
1
4
.527
24
52.
Iowa
.563
3
2
.503
43
 
102.
Arkansas
.340
1
4
.523
29
53.
Northern Illinois
.552
4
1
.367
118
 
103.
Rice
.339
1
4
.521
30
54.
Troy
.552
3
2
.492
50
 
104.
Buffalo
.335
1
3
.484
53
55.
Oklahoma State
.550
2
2
.550
12
 
105.
Fla. International
.330
1
4
.511
39
56.
Oklahoma
.549
2
1
.448
78
 
106.
South Alabama
.322
1
4
.503
45
57.
Penn State
.541
3
2
.481
56
 
107.
Temple
.321
1
2
.415
105
58.
Michigan
.540
2
2
.540
16
 
108.
UTEP
.313
1
4
.492
49
59.
Mississippi
.540
3
2
.480
57
 
109.
Hawaii
.312
1
3
.458
71
60.
N.C. State
.525
3
2
.464
68
 
110.
UAB
.305
0
4
.637
2
61.
Ball State
.521
3
2
.461
70
 
111.
Kansas
.300
1
3
.443
79
62.
Central Florida
.521
2
2
.521
31
 
112.
Wyoming
.296
1
3
.439
82
63.
Virginia Tech
.513
3
2
.453
74
 
113.
New Mexico State
.283
1
4
.456
72
64.
Central Michigan
.501
2
2
.501
46
 
114.
Akron
.271
1
4
.441
80
65.
Wake Forest
.501
3
2
.441
81
 
115.
Southern Miss
.257
0
4
.580
9
66.
Fresno State
.497
3
2
.437
84
 
116.
Colorado
.254
1
4
.420
99
67.
BYU
.495
3
2
.435
87
 
117.
UNLV
.244
1
4
.406
112
68.
Connecticut
.489
3
2
.429
89
 
118.
Colorado State
.231
1
4
.389
116
69.
New Mexico
.489
2
3
.549
13
 
119.
Tulane
.219
0
4
.529
21
70.
Miami, Ohio
.487
3
2
.427
90
 
120.
Massachusetts
.212
0
5
.519
34
71.
Texas State
.485
2
2
.485
52
 
121.
Eastern Michigan
.189
0
4
.483
54
72.
East Carolina
.483
3
2
.423
95
 
122.
Idaho
.161
0
5
.434
88
73.
Kentucky
.479
1
4
.661
1
 
123.
Army
.156
0
4
.426
93
74.
LA Monroe
.477
2
2
.477
60
 
124.
Memphis
.151
0
4
.415
106
75.
South Florida
.474
2
3
.534
18
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved