Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

The Irish, Wildcats, & Tide Are Just .003 Apart

  • There's a 3-team logjam at the top of the rankings, as #1 Notre Dame, #2 Kansas State, and #3 Alabama — the teams that have accomplished the most to date — are separated by only .003
  • (9-0) Notre Dame has beaten #12 Stanford and #13 Oklahoma, (9-0) Kansas State has beaten #13 Oklahoma and #20 Texas Tech, and (9-0) Alabama has beaten #10 LSU and #24 Mississippi State
  • No other undefeated team has beaten anyone in the current top-15
  • The SEC, with 5 teams in the top-10, has now taken over the top spot in the conference rankings
  • No team in the top-10 (including #10 LSU) moved more than one spot in the rankings this week
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 4

Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Notre Dame
.836
9
0
.560
25
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Kansas State
.833
9
0
.555
30
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Alabama
.833
9
0
.554
31
1-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.808
10
0
.513
48
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Florida
.807
8
1
.603
5
2-1
1-0
0
6.
Oregon
.803
9
0
.504
58
0-0
1-0
0
7.
Georgia
.787
8
1
.573
17
1-1
0-0
0
8.
Oregon State
.787
7
1
.583
14
0-0
2-0
1
9.
South Carolina
.745
7
2
.594
7
1-2
0-0
0
10.
LSU
.744
7
2
.592
10
1-2
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Louisville
.740
9
0
.415
111
  Southeastern
.636
36
7
.426
12. Stanford
.728
7
2
.572
18
  Big 12
.628
26
4
.396
13. Oklahoma
.726
6
2
.588
12
  Pac-12
.594
24
10
.469
14. Texas A&M
.720
7
2
.562
23
  Big Ten
.585
34
14
.458
15. Texas
.717
7
2
.558
26
  Big East
.500
22
13
.423
16. Nebraska
.715
7
2
.556
29
  Atlantic Coast
.489
26
15
.409
17. Clemson
.714
8
1
.476
69
  Mid-American
.438
26
26
.438
18. UCLA
.700
7
2
.539
37
  WAC
.435
20
17
.411
19. Florida State
.694
8
1
.451
87
  Sun Belt
.430
16
22
.478
20. Texas Tech
.680
6
3
.586
13
  Mountain West
.398
17
24
.448
21. Arizona
.675
5
4
.645
2
  Conference USA
.375
12
36
.527
22. Northwestern
.674
7
2
.509
52
  *non-conference play
23. Toledo
.670
8
1
.424
106
 
24. Mississippi State
.664
7
2
.497
59
 
25. Rutgers
.661
7
1
.426
105
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Michigan
.661
6
3
.566
19
 
76.
East Carolina .466 6 4 .407 112
27.
Washington
.652
5
4
.621
3
 
77.
Pittsburgh .462 4 5 .495 60
28.
Oklahoma State
.651
5
3
.580
16
 
78.
Purdue .456 3 6 .557 28
29.
Louisiana Tech
.648
8
1
.401
117
 
79.
Georgia Tech .442 4 5 .475 71
30.
USC
.648
6
3
.550
33
 
80.
California .441 3 7 .563 20
31.
Kent State
.645
8
1
.398
119
 
81.
Air Force .429 5 4 .397 120
32.
Penn State
.645
6
3
.548
34
 
82.
Miami, Ohio .427 4 5 .460 81
33.
West Virginia
.633
5
3
.560
24
 
83.
Auburn .422 2 7 .593 9
34.
Iowa State
.633
5
4
.601
6
 
84.
South Florida .415 3 6 .516 45
35.
Northern Illinois
.628
9
1
.372
123
 
85.
Temple .414 3 5 .489 66
36.
TCU
.622
6
3
.523
43
 
86.
UTSA .409 5 4 .377 122
37.
San Jose State
.621
7
2
.451
88
 
87.
Kentucky .408 1 9 .662 1
38.
Wisconsin
.615
6
3
.515
46
 
88.
Virginia .405 3 6 .506 56
39.
Boise State
.612
7
2
.441
94
 
89.
Houston .405 4 5 .438 96
40.
Cincinnati
.612
6
2
.459
82
 
90.
SMU .400 4 5 .433 99
41.
Utah State
.609
8
2
.423
107
 
91.
Troy .399 4 5 .431 101
42.
Navy
.595
6
3
.495
61
 
92.
Western Michigan .396 4 6 .455 86
43.
Michigan State
.594
5
5
.594
8
 
93.
Central Michigan .391 3 6 .491 64
44.
Ohio
.592
8
1
.346
124
 
94.
Illinois .391 2 7 .562 22
45.
Vanderbilt
.590
5
4
.557
27
 
95.
North Texas .390 3 6 .490 65
46.
Missouri
.588
4
5
.619
4
 
96.
Texas State .387 3 5 .461 79
47.
Miami, Fla.
.583
5
4
.551
32
 
97.
Marshall .386 4 5 .418 110
48.
Mississippi
.579
5
4
.546
35
 
98.
New Mexico .386 4 6 .444 93
49.
Central Florida
.578
7
2
.407
115
 
99.
Maryland .375 4 5 .406 116
50.
North Carolina
.577
6
3
.476
70
 
100.
Rice .364 4 6 .421 109
51.
Ball State
.574
6
3
.473
73
 
101.
Washington State .355 2 7 .525 42
52.
Tulsa
.573
7
2
.401
118
 
102.
Connecticut .353 3 6 .450 89
53.
Arizona State
.568
5
4
.535
39
 
103.
Buffalo .344 2 7 .512 50
54.
San Diego State
.550
7
3
.429
103
 
104.
Kansas .344 1 8 .591 11
55.
Fresno State
.548
7
3
.427
104
 
105.
Boston College .340 2 7 .508 54
56.
Western Kentucky
.548
6
3
.447
91
 
106.
Florida Atlantic .338 2 7 .506 57
57.
Tennessee
.547
4
5
.580
15
 
107.
UTEP .310 2 7 .474 72
58.
BYU
.547
5
4
.513
47
 
108.
Tulane .303 2 7 .466 77
59.
LA Monroe
.546
6
3
.445
92
 
109.
Fla. International .303 2 8 .480 67
60.
Arkansas State
.541
6
3
.440
95
 
110.
Wyoming .301 2 7 .462 78
61.
Baylor
.533
4
4
.533
41
 
111.
UNLV .300 2 8 .477 68
62.
Arkansas
.530
4
5
.563
21
 
112.
Army .299 2 7 .460 80
63.
Minnesota
.525
5
4
.492
63
 
113.
Colorado .295 1 8 .535 40
64.
Duke
.516
6
4
.456
84
 
114.
UAB .289 2 7 .449 90
65.
Utah
.509
4
5
.543
36
 
115.
South Alabama .280 2 7 .437 97
66.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.507
6
3
.407
113
 
116.
Colorado State .276 2 7 .432 100
67.
Bowling Green
.507
6
3
.407
114
 
117.
Eastern Michigan .262 1 8 .494 62
68.
Wake Forest
.506
5
4
.473
74
 
118.
Idaho .244 1 8 .471 76
69.
Iowa
.502
4
5
.535
38
 
119.
Hawaii .241 1 7 .456 85
70.
LA Lafayette
.496
5
3
.421
108
 
120.
Akron .239 1 9 .472 75
71.
N.C. State
.492
5
4
.459
83
 
121.
Memphis .220 1 8 .437 98
72.
Indiana
.483
4
5
.517
44
 
122.
New Mexico State .215 1 8 .430 102
73.
Virginia Tech
.480
4
5
.513
49
 
123.
Southern Miss .207 0 9 .512 51
74.
Nevada
.478
6
3
.379
121
 
124.
Massachusetts .204 0 9 .506 55
75.
Syracuse
.475
4
5
.508
53
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved