Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Kansas St. Stays #1; Notre Dame Moves to #2

  • Kansas St. holds off Notre Dame to retain the top spot, after the Irish match the Wildcats' feat of winning at (now-#16) Oklahoma
  • #1 Kansas St. has also beaten #13 Texas Tech and #22 West Virginia, and #2 Notre Dame has beaten #11 Stanford — as the Wildcats and Irish have accomplished the most of any teams to date
  • Alabama moves to a season-high #3, while the Tide's first tough road test — its showdown at #9 LSU — looms
  • With 5 weeks to go, only 6 undefeated teams remain
  • Half of the top-10 teams are from the SEC, while the Big 12 is the only conference with more than half its membership in the top-30
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 28

Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Kansas State
.842
8
0
.571
16
0-0
3-0
0
2.
Notre Dame
.838
8
0
.564
20
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Alabama
.814
8
0
.523
38
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.811
9
0
.517
43
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Oregon
.802
8
0
.503
54
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Florida
.802
7
1
.606
5
2-1
1-0
0
7.
Georgia
.778
7
1
.571
17
1-1
0-0
0
8.
Oregon State
.778
6
1
.584
12
0-0
1-0
1
9.
LSU
.764
7
1
.551
29
1-1
1-0
0
10.
South Carolina
.742
7
2
.589
9
1-2
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Stanford
.740
6
2
.606
6
  Big 12
.636
26
4
.404
12. Louisville
.735
8
0
.409
112
  Southeastern
.634
33
7
.432
13. Texas Tech
.716
6
2
.576
15
  Pac-12
.594
24
10
.469
14. Arizona
.707
5
3
.641
2
  Big Ten
.585
34
14
.458
15. Mississippi State
.701
7
1
.471
75
  Big East
.502
22
12
.414
16. Oklahoma
.699
5
2
.579
14
  Atlantic Coast
.482
26
15
.402
17. Nebraska
.693
6
2
.548
30
  WAC
.446
20
16
.413
18. Clemson
.693
7
1
.461
81
  Sun Belt
.441
16
20
.475
19. Florida State
.690
8
1
.448
94
  Mid-American
.435
26
26
.435
20. Texas
.689
6
2
.544
31
  Mountain West
.409
17
23
.453
21. Texas A&M
.685
6
2
.540
34
  Conference USA
.375
12
35
.524
22. West Virginia
.678
5
2
.555
26
  *non-conference play
23. Boise State
.677
7
1
.443
98
 
24. USC
.677
6
2
.530
37
 
25. Northwestern
.674
7
2
.509
49
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
UCLA
.668
6
2
.520
41
 
76.
Purdue
.468
3
5
.543
32
27.
Toledo
.667
8
1
.421
108
 
77.
LA Lafayette
.454
4
3
.412
109
28.
Iowa State
.666
5
3
.595
8
 
78.
California
.453
3
6
.554
27
29.
Rutgers
.664
7
1
.428
102
 
79.
Pittsburgh
.449
4
4
.449
92
30.
Oklahoma State
.661
5
2
.535
36
 
80.
East Carolina
.443
5
4
.410
111
31.
Michigan
.642
5
3
.570
18
 
81.
New Mexico
.439
4
5
.472
74
32.
Washington
.639
4
4
.639
3
 
82.
Houston
.436
4
4
.436
100
33.
Kent State
.637
7
1
.400
117
 
83.
Indiana
.434
3
5
.509
48
34.
Tulsa
.632
7
1
.395
119
 
84.
Central Michigan
.429
3
5
.504
53
35.
Northern Illinois
.628
8
1
.380
121
 
85.
Troy
.425
4
4
.425
105
36.
Penn State
.625
5
3
.552
28
 
86.
UTSA
.423
5
3
.352
123
37.
San Jose State
.625
6
2
.473
73
 
87.
SMU
.423
4
4
.423
107
38.
Louisiana Tech
.623
7
1
.385
120
 
88.
Kentucky
.419
1
8
.665
1
39.
Michigan State
.620
5
4
.588
10
 
89.
Temple
.417
3
4
.459
82
40.
Wisconsin
.614
6
3
.514
46
 
90.
Texas State
.415
3
4
.457
84
41.
LA Monroe
.603
6
2
.450
91
 
91.
North Texas
.411
3
5
.485
65
42.
Western Kentucky
.600
6
2
.447
95
 
92.
Maryland
.401
4
4
.401
116
43.
Utah State
.598
7
2
.427
104
 
93.
Georgia Tech
.395
3
5
.469
77
44.
Cincinnati
.591
5
2
.461
80
 
94.
Auburn
.393
1
7
.631
4
45.
Navy
.590
5
3
.515
45
 
95.
South Florida
.383
2
6
.536
35
46.
Ohio
.588
7
1
.352
124
 
96.
Connecticut
.381
3
5
.454
87
47.
Missouri
.585
4
4
.585
11
 
97.
Marshall
.379
3
5
.452
88
48.
TCU
.583
5
3
.508
50
 
98.
Washington State
.369
2
6
.521
39
49.
Mississippi
.583
5
3
.508
51
 
99.
Illinois
.366
2
6
.518
42
50.
North Carolina
.577
6
3
.476
69
 
100.
Western Michigan
.361
3
6
.459
83
51.
Arizona State
.571
5
3
.495
56
 
101.
Florida Atlantic
.354
2
6
.505
52
52.
Vanderbilt
.559
4
4
.559
22
 
102.
Kansas
.347
1
7
.584
13
53.
Miami, Fla.
.558
4
4
.558
23
 
103.
Rice
.344
3
6
.440
99
54.
Ball State
.558
6
3
.457
85
 
104.
Virginia
.343
2
6
.492
60
55.
Central Florida
.558
6
2
.404
115
 
105.
Boston College
.342
2
6
.491
62
56.
Fresno State
.556
6
3
.455
86
 
106.
Tulane
.335
2
6
.483
67
57.
Iowa
.555
4
4
.555
25
 
107.
South Alabama
.322
2
6
.469
78
58.
Minnesota
.551
5
3
.476
70
 
108.
UTEP
.319
2
7
.484
66
59.
N.C. State
.549
5
3
.474
72
 
109.
Colorado State
.302
2
6
.445
97
60.
BYU
.544
5
4
.510
47
 
110.
Buffalo
.291
1
7
.520
40
61.
Tennessee
.530
3
5
.604
7
 
111.
Colorado
.288
1
7
.516
44
62.
Duke
.525
6
3
.424
106
 
112.
UAB
.269
1
7
.492
61
63.
Arkansas State
.522
5
3
.447
96
 
113.
Wyoming
.268
1
7
.491
63
64.
Baylor
.515
3
4
.558
24
 
114.
Fla. International
.262
1
8
.494
59
65.
Bowling Green
.511
6
3
.410
110
 
115.
Eastern Michigan
.260
1
7
.481
68
66.
San Diego State
.508
6
3
.407
114
 
116.
UNLV
.256
1
8
.486
64
67.
Syracuse
.498
4
4
.498
55
 
117.
Hawaii
.245
1
6
.448
93
68.
Virginia Tech
.495
4
4
.495
57
 
118.
Akron
.238
1
8
.463
79
69.
Utah
.489
3
5
.565
19
 
119.
Army
.237
1
7
.451
89
70.
Arkansas
.489
3
5
.564
21
 
120.
Idaho
.237
1
7
.451
90
71.
Air Force
.483
5
3
.408
113
 
121.
Southern Miss
.227
0
8
.540
33
72.
Wake Forest
.475
4
4
.475
71
 
122.
Memphis
.224
1
7
.432
101
73.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.471
5
3
.397
118
 
123.
New Mexico State
.221
1
7
.428
103
74.
Nevada
.471
6
3
.372
122
 
124.
Massachusetts
.196
0
8
.495
58
75.
Miami, Ohio
.470
4
4
.470
76
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved