Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Huskies Achieve Highest Pre-Bowl Rating Ever

  • Washington’s .856 rating is the highest final pre-bowl rating in the 30-year history of the Anderson & Hester Rankings—as no other team has ever played as tough of a pre-bowl schedule and gone undefeated
  • The Huskies have won 6 games versus the current top-25, twice as many as any other top-10 team
  • Michigan is the clear #2 team, while #3 Florida State is noticeably ahead of the rest of the field
  • #4 Ohio State (.800), #5 Alabama (.798), and #6 Texas (.798) are separated by just .002 in the battle for the fourth spot
  • Oregon, at #8, is the highest-ranked 2-loss team
  • In the past half-century, only 7 Pac-12 (or Pac-10) teams have gone undefeated heading into the bowls: USC in 1979 (with a tie); Washington in 1991; Arizona State in 1996; USC in 2004 and 2005; Oregon in 2010; and Washington in 2023
  • The Pac-12 is going out in style, as it is the top conference heading into the bowl games
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 3

Nov. 26 Rankings
Nov. 20 Rankings
Nov. 13 Rankings
Nov. 6 Rankings
Oct. 30 Rankings
Oct. 23 Rankings

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Washington
.856
13
0
.598
8
2-0
4-0
0
2.
Michigan
.836
13
0
.560
31
2-0
1-0
0
3.
Florida State
.815
13
0
.524
63
0-0
2-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.800
11
1
.571
20
1-1
1-0
0
5.
Alabama
.798
12
1
.564
23
2-1
1-0
0
6.
Texas
.798
12
1
.563
24
1-0
1-1
0
7.
Georgia
.783
12
1
.541
49
1-1
1-0
0
8.
Oregon
.776
11
2
.589
11
0-2
3-0
0
9.
Penn State
.755
10
2
.569
22
0-2
1-0
0
10.
Mississippi
.745
10
2
.556
34
0-2
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Oklahoma
.742
10
2
.553
39
  Pac-12
.604
29
7
.414
12.
Liberty
.740
13
0
.415
123
  Big Ten
.603
33
9
.427
13.
Missouri
.732
10
2
.539
52
  Southeastern
.603
45
11
.414
14.
Iowa
.730
10
3
.580
14
  Atlantic Coast
.575
39
17
.455
15.
James Madison
.725
11
1
.468
87
  Big 12
.570
30
12
.439
16.
LSU
.716
9
3
.575
19
  Sun Belt
.498
34
22
.434
17.
Arizona
.703
9
3
.561
27
  Mountain West
.469
25
24
.462
18.
Louisville
.695
10
3
.539
53
  Conference USA
.430
18
19
.438
19.
Utah
.691
8
4
.598
7
  American Athletic
.419
24
31
.457
20.
Oregon State
.681
8
4
.588
13
  Mid-American
.392
20
28
.441
21.
Troy
.676
11
2
.462
92
  *non-conference play
22.
Notre Dame
.674
9
3
.527
60
 
23.
N.C. State
.669
9
3
.521
65
 
24.
USC
.660
7
5
.613
3
 
25.
Kansas State
.657
8
4
.560
29
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Oklahoma State
.656
9
4
.543
46
 
81.
Boston College
.491
6
6
.491
75
27.
Tulane
.644
11
2
.427
113
 
82.
Marshall
.489
6
6
.489
77
28.
Clemson
.640
8
4
.542
48
 
83.
BYU
.488
5
7
.539
54
29.
Tennessee
.636
8
4
.538
55
 
84.
South Alabama
.476
6
6
.476
80
30.
Kansas
.635
8
4
.537
58
 
85.
Texas State
.473
7
5
.423
118
31.
Toledo
.635
11
2
.418
120
 
86.
Arizona State
.471
3
9
.624
1
32.
SMU
.625
11
2
.408
127
 
87.
Arkansas State
.468
6
6
.468
86
33.
North Carolina
.618
8
4
.519
66
 
88.
Georgia Southern
.464
6
6
.464
90
34.
Miami, Ohio
.617
11
2
.399
129
 
89.
Stanford
.461
3
9
.614
2
35.
Iowa State
.608
7
5
.560
32
 
90.
Utah State
.459
6
6
.459
94
36.
West Virginia
.604
8
4
.504
67
 
91.
Wake Forest
.440
4
8
.541
50
37.
UCLA
.604
7
5
.555
36
 
92.
Arkansas
.436
4
8
.537
57
38.
Wisconsin
.603
7
5
.554
37
 
93.
Army
.432
5
6
.458
95
39.
Northwestern
.598
7
5
.549
41
 
94.
Louisiana 
.431
6
6
.431
109
40.
Miami, Fla.
.598
7
5
.549
42
 
95.
Rice
.428
6
6
.428
112
41.
Maryland
.596
7
5
.546
44
 
96.
Houston
.426
4
8
.527
61
42.
Memphis
.593
9
3
.439
105
 
97.
Virginia
.423
3
9
.577
17
43.
Duke
.592
7
5
.543
47
 
98.
Indiana
.423
3
9
.577
18
44.
California
.591
6
6
.591
9
 
99.
South Florida
.416
6
6
.416
122
45.
Texas A&M
.588
7
5
.539
51
 
100.
Colorado State
.399
5
7
.447
100
46.
Kentucky
.583
7
5
.533
59
 
101.
Pittsburgh
.393
3
9
.546
45
47.
Rutgers
.579
6
6
.579
15
 
102.
Hawaii
.392
5
8
.460
93
48.
Wyoming
.571
8
4
.470
85
 
103.
Navy
.386
5
6
.412
125
49.
UNLV
.566
9
4
.449
98
 
104.
Baylor
.385
3
9
.538
56
50.
Boise State
.564
8
5
.495
72
 
105.
North Texas
.379
5
7
.427
114
51.
Auburn
.560
6
6
.560
30
 
106.
Northern Illinois
.375
6
6
.375
131
52.
New Mexico St.
.555
10
4
.424
116
 
107.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.373
4
8
.471
82
53.
Georgia Tech
.553
6
6
.553
38
 
108.
San Diego State
.372
4
8
.471
83
54.
Texas Tech
.550
6
6
.550
40
 
109.
Cincinnati
.372
3
9
.524
62
55.
Virginia Tech
.547
6
6
.547
43
 
110.
Eastern Michigan
.366
6
6
.366
133
56.
Appalachian St.
.545
8
5
.475
81
 
111.
Western Michigan
.366
4
8
.464
89
57.
San Jose State
.543
7
5
.492
73
 
112.
Central Michigan
.365
5
7
.412
124
58.
Minnesota
.541
5
7
.590
10
 
113.
New Mexico
.365
4
8
.463
91
59.
Coastal Carolina
.541
7
5
.491
76
 
114.
Vanderbilt
.354
2
10
.561
28
60.
Washington State
.539
5
7
.588
12
 
115.
Southern Miss
.351
3
9
.501
70
61.
Air Force
.529
8
4
.428
111
 
116.
Tulsa
.351
4
8
.447
99
62.
Illinois
.529
5
7
.578
16
 
117.
Ball State
.350
4
8
.447
102
63.
Fresno State
.526
8
4
.426
115
 
118.
UAB
.349
4
8
.445
103
64.
Old Dominion
.523
6
6
.523
64
 
119.
Massachusetts
.348
3
9
.498
71
65.
Florida
.521
5
7
.571
21
 
120.
Connecticut
.331
3
9
.479
79
66.
Ohio
.519
9
3
.367
132
 
121.
Florida Atlantic
.329
4
8
.424
117
67.
Jacksonville St.
.518
8
4
.418
119
 
122.
UTEP
.323
3
9
.470
84
68.
UTSA
.518
8
4
.417
121
 
123.
Fla. International
.318
4
8
.411
126
69.
Nebraska
.512
5
7
.562
25
 
124.
Louisiana Tech
.299
3
9
.442
104
70.
South Carolina
.512
5
7
.562
26
 
125.
Buffalo
.295
3
9
.438
106
71.
Michigan State
.507
4
8
.607
4
 
126.
Sam Houston St.
.294
3
9
.436
107
72.
Mississippi State
.506
5
7
.556
33
 
127.
Temple
.290
3
9
.431
108
73.
Western Kentucky
.506
7
5
.456
96
 
128.
Charlotte
.288
3
9
.429
110
74.
TCU
.505
5
7
.555
35
 
129.
LA Monroe
.287
2
10
.484
78
75.
Bowling Green
.505
7
5
.455
97
 
130.
Nevada
.271
2
10
.465
88
76.
UCF
.502
6
6
.502
68
 
131.
East Carolina
.257
2
10
.447
101
77.
Syracuse
.502
6
6
.502
69
 
132.
Akron
.214
2
10
.388
130
78.
Colorado
.502
4
8
.602
5
 
133.
Kent State
.183
1
11
.403
128
79.
Purdue
.501
4
8
.601
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
80.
Georgia State
.491
6
6
.491
74
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2023 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved