Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

#1 Washington Expands Its Lead

  • The (10-0) Huskies, winners over current-#18 Utah on Saturday, have played the 18th-toughest schedule to date, while no other undefeated team has played a schedule that’s tougher than #48
  • Among the 7 undefeated teams, Washington has beaten the highest-ranked team (#9 Oregon) and has the most wins (4) versus the current top-25 (no other undefeated team has more than 2)
  • With its win at current-#12 Penn State, Michigan narrowly overtakes Ohio State for the #2 spot, while Georgia cracks the top-5 for the first time this season
  • Washington leads Michigan by .018, then #2-5 are all pretty closely bunched together (separated by .011), then #6-9 are even closer (separated by .003), before a huge gap between #9 Oregon and #10 Ole Miss
  • The Pac-12 leads all conferences with 6 teams in the top-25, half of the conference’s teams
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 13

Nov. 6 Rankings
Oct. 30 Rankings
Oct. 23 Rankings

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Washington
.842
10
0
.572
18
1-0
3-0
0
2.
Michigan
.824
10
0
.539
48
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Ohio State
.823
10
0
.537
52
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Florida State
.817
10
0
.528
59
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Georgia
.813
10
0
.520
62
1-0
1-0
0
6.
Alabama
.792
9
1
.573
17
1-1
1-0
0
7.
James Madison
.790
10
0
.485
84
0-0
1-0
0
8.
Texas
.790
9
1
.569
22
1-0
1-1
0
9.
Oregon
.789
9
1
.567
24
0-1
2-0
0
10.
Mississippi
.753
8
2
.589
11
0-2
2-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Louisville
.748
9
1
.511
67
  Big Ten
.619
33
9
.443
12.
Penn State
.745
8
2
.578
13
  Pac-12
.617
29
6
.411
13.
Liberty
.740
10
0
.416
121
  Southeastern
.611
37
8
.410
14.
Iowa
.738
8
2
.570
20
  Atlantic Coast
.580
36
14
.446
15.
Missouri
.728
8
2
.558
33
  Big 12
.568
30
12
.437
16.
Oklahoma
.728
8
2
.557
34
  Sun Belt
.523
34
18
.430
17.
Oregon State
.711
8
2
.536
53
  Mountain West
.473
25
24
.467
18.
Utah
.708
7
3
.597
8
  American Athletic
.421
24
31
.458
19.
LSU
.700
7
3
.588
12
  Conference USA
.419
16
18
.437
20.
USC
.691
7
4
.616
2
  Mid-American
.403
20
28
.452
21.
North Carolina
.676
8
2
.495
75
  *non-conference play
22.
Arizona
.675
7
3
.560
30
 
23.
Tulane
.675
9
1
.421
118
 
24.
Troy
.670
8
2
.488
80
 
25.
Kansas State
.664
7
3
.548
39
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Toledo
.664
9
1
.409
122
 
81.
Boise State
.497
5
5
.497
74
27.
Kansas
.660
7
3
.543
43
 
82.
Old Dominion
.495
4
6
.555
35
28.
Notre Dame
.660
7
3
.543
45
 
83.
Michigan State
.492
3
7
.613
3
29.
Oklahoma State
.655
7
3
.538
51
 
84.
Stanford
.490
3
7
.610
4
30.
Tennessee
.651
7
3
.533
55
 
85.
South Alabama
.489
5
5
.489
79
31.
N.C. State
.633
7
3
.514
64
 
86.
Western Kentucky
.487
5
5
.487
82
32.
Fresno State
.629
8
2
.444
104
 
87.
TCU
.486
4
6
.547
40
33.
Memphis
.624
8
2
.438
110
 
88.
Arizona State
.485
3
7
.606
5
34.
UNLV
.624
8
2
.438
111
 
89.
Arkansas State
.484
5
5
.484
85
35.
Duke
.622
6
4
.564
26
 
90.
Utah State
.475
5
5
.475
92
36.
Rutgers
.621
6
4
.563
28
 
91.
Indiana
.473
3
7
.594
9
37.
Texas A&M
.617
6
4
.559
32
 
92.
Wake Forest
.468
4
6
.528
58
38.
Coastal Carolina
.613
7
3
.492
76
 
93.
Houston
.454
4
6
.514
65
39.
UCLA
.608
6
4
.550
38
 
94.
Louisiana 
.442
5
5
.442
106
40.
Miami, Fla.
.603
6
4
.544
42
 
95.
Arkansas
.430
3
7
.552
36
41.
Auburn
.602
6
4
.543
44
 
96.
South Florida
.422
5
5
.422
117
42.
Clemson
.600
6
4
.541
47
 
97.
Colorado State
.417
4
6
.477
90
43.
Miami, Ohio
.593
8
2
.407
124
 
98.
Baylor
.417
3
7
.538
50
44.
Iowa State
.590
6
4
.531
56
 
99.
Western Michigan
.413
4
6
.473
93
45.
Air Force
.588
8
2
.402
127
 
100.
Virginia
.406
2
8
.592
10
46.
Maryland
.588
6
4
.529
57
 
101.
Army
.403
4
6
.462
97
47.
Kentucky
.587
6
4
.527
60
 
102.
Central Michigan
.394
5
5
.394
129
48.
West Virginia
.584
6
4
.525
61
 
103.
Rice
.391
4
6
.450
103
49.
Wisconsin
.576
5
5
.576
14
 
104.
Navy
.391
4
5
.423
115
50.
Minnesota
.575
5
5
.575
15
 
105.
Cincinnati
.386
3
7
.506
69
51.
Illinois
.575
5
5
.575
16
 
106.
Hawaii
.385
4
7
.465
96
52.
Wyoming
.563
6
4
.503
71
 
107.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.381
3
7
.501
73
53.
Virginia Tech
.563
5
5
.563
27
 
108.
Pittsburgh
.375
2
8
.561
29
54.
SMU
.562
8
2
.376
133
 
109.
Vanderbilt
.372
2
9
.569
21
55.
Northwestern
.559
5
5
.559
31
 
110.
Southern Miss
.370
3
7
.489
78
56.
Georgia Tech
.551
5
5
.551
37
 
111.
UAB
.368
3
7
.487
81
57.
Boston College
.550
6
4
.490
77
 
112.
Massachusetts
.367
3
7
.486
83
58.
Jacksonville St.
.547
7
3
.426
113
 
113.
Florida Atlantic
.360
4
6
.417
120
59.
Colorado
.546
4
6
.605
6
 
114.
Ball State
.357
3
7
.475
91
60.
Nebraska
.545
5
5
.545
41
 
115.
Tulsa
.354
3
7
.472
94
61.
Georgia State
.544
6
4
.484
86
 
116.
San Diego State
.349
3
7
.467
95
62.
Florida
.542
5
5
.542
46
 
117.
Northern Illinois
.349
4
6
.406
125
63.
California
.541
4
6
.600
7
 
118.
Eastern Michigan
.348
4
6
.405
126
64.
Texas Tech
.539
5
5
.539
49
 
119.
New Mexico
.344
3
7
.461
100
65.
Georgia Southern
.538
6
4
.478
89
 
120.
UTEP
.336
3
7
.452
101
66.
UTSA
.530
7
3
.409
123
 
121.
Fla. International
.335
4
6
.391
131
67.
Appalachian St.
.521
6
4
.461
99
 
122.
Charlotte
.326
3
7
.441
107
68.
Syracuse
.517
5
5
.517
63
 
123.
North Texas
.326
3
7
.441
108
69.
Purdue
.516
3
7
.635
1
 
124.
Buffalo
.321
3
7
.435
112
70.
New Mexico St.
.516
8
3
.378
132
 
125.
Temple
.307
3
7
.419
119
71.
Marshall
.513
5
5
.513
66
 
126.
Nevada
.305
2
8
.482
87
72.
Ohio
.513
7
3
.392
130
 
127.
LA Monroe
.303
2
8
.480
88
73.
Bowling Green
.511
6
4
.451
102
 
128.
Louisiana Tech
.297
3
8
.426
114
74.
South Carolina
.510
4
6
.570
19
 
129.
East Carolina
.288
2
8
.462
98
75.
San Jose State
.510
5
5
.510
68
 
130.
Connecticut
.287
1
9
.534
54
76.
Mississippi State
.508
4
6
.568
23
 
131.
Sam Houston St.
.272
2
8
.443
105
77.
Washington State
.506
4
6
.566
25
 
132.
Akron
.236
2
8
.396
128
78.
UCF
.505
5
5
.505
70
 
133.
Kent State
.205
1
9
.423
116
79.
BYU
.502
5
5
.502
72
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
80.
Texas State
.500
6
4
.440
109
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2023 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved