Give Promo They Really Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Sooners Premiere at #1

  • Oklahoma, which is undefeated and beat #7 Texas, claims the top spot based on accomplishments to date
  • Ohio St., Florida St., Michigan, and Washington crack the top-5
  • Four 1-loss teams—all of whom have played top-20 schedules to date—have accomplished more so far than #11 Georgia (last season’s #1), which has played the 108th-toughest schedule and hasn’t yet beaten a top-40 team
  • Undefeated Air Force is #13
  • Half of the Pac-12 is in the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 23

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oklahoma
.826
7
0
.542
31
1-0
0-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.823
7
0
.538
33
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Florida State
.816
7
0
.525
45
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Michigan
.815
8
0
.524
46
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Washington
.810
7
0
.515
59
0-0
1-0
0
6.
James Madison
.799
7
0
.499
75
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Texas
.796
6
1
.609
2
1-1
0-0
0
8.
Alabama
.772
7
1
.562
16
1-1
0-0
0
9.
Utah
.770
6
1
.572
10
0-0
2-1
0
10.
Mississippi
.760
6
1
.558
17
0-1
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Georgia
.759
7
0
.441
108
  Big Ten
.628
33
9
.453
12.
Oregon State
.746
6
1
.540
32
  Pac-12
.625
29
6
.420
13.
Air Force
.742
7
0
.418
118
  Southeastern
.606
35
8
.410
14.
Missouri
.739
7
1
.518
52
  Atlantic Coast
.580
33
13
.447
15.
North Carolina
.735
6
1
.525
44
  Big 12
.568
30
12
.438
16.
Liberty
.732
7
0
.405
127
  Sun Belt
.530
33
17
.433
17.
Penn State
.728
6
1
.517
56
  Mountain West
.472
25
23
.460
18.
Oregon
.725
6
1
.513
63
  American Athletic
.431
24
31
.469
19.
Iowa
.713
6
2
.572
11
  Conference USA
.412
14
17
.440
20.
Louisville
.702
6
1
.485
86
  Mid-American
.408
20
28
.457
21.
USC
.697
6
2
.553
21
  *non-conference play
22.
Notre Dame
.695
6
2
.551
23
 
23.
LSU
.693
6
2
.549
25
 
24.
Wisconsin
.691
5
2
.569
12
 
25.
UCLA
.678
5
2
.554
19
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Georgia State
.673
6
1
.452
103
 
81.
Baylor
.478
3
4
.521
50
27.
Tulane
.672
6
1
.450
105
 
82.
South Carolina
.473
2
5
.603
3
28.
Tennessee
.660
5
2
.534
37
 
83.
Houston
.471
3
4
.514
60
29.
Rutgers
.659
6
2
.510
67
 
84.
Texas Tech
.461
3
5
.537
34
30.
Kansas State
.657
5
2
.531
39
 
85.
Michigan State
.458
2
5
.589
6
31.
Duke
.654
5
2
.528
42
 
86.
UCF
.454
3
4
.497
78
32.
Toledo
.646
7
1
.409
122
 
87.
Rice
.453
4
3
.410
121
33.
Troy
.645
5
2
.517
54
 
88.
Arkansas State
.452
3
4
.494
80
34.
Florida
.644
5
2
.516
57
 
89.
Tulsa
.451
3
4
.493
81
35.
Minnesota
.644
4
3
.603
4
 
90.
San Jose State
.447
3
5
.522
48
36.
UNLV
.643
6
1
.418
117
 
91.
Boise State
.443
3
4
.486
85
37.
Oklahoma State
.640
5
2
.512
65
 
92.
Virginia
.441
2
5
.572
9
38.
Wyoming
.635
5
2
.506
68
 
93.
Utah State
.441
3
5
.516
58
39.
Kansas
.633
5
2
.505
69
 
94.
Colorado State
.439
3
4
.482
89
40.
Fresno State
.629
6
1
.404
128
 
95.
New Mexico St.
.437
5
3
.364
133
41.
Miami, Fla.
.628
5
2
.499
74
 
96.
Northern Illinois
.435
4
4
.435
110
42.
Washington State
.627
4
3
.586
7
 
97.
Indiana
.435
2
5
.566
15
43.
Maryland
.618
5
2
.489
84
 
98.
South Florida
.435
4
4
.435
111
44.
Georgia Southern
.611
5
2
.482
90
 
99.
Navy
.434
3
4
.477
93
45.
Nebraska
.608
4
3
.567
14
 
100.
Appalachian St.
.431
3
4
.474
96
46.
Kentucky
.605
5
2
.475
94
 
101.
Stanford
.423
2
5
.554
20
47.
Colorado
.597
4
3
.556
18
 
102.
San Diego State
.418
3
5
.493
82
48.
Memphis
.597
5
2
.467
98
 
103.
Florida Atlantic
.417
3
4
.459
101
49.
Iowa State
.585
4
3
.543
29
 
104.
Central Michigan
.406
4
4
.406
124
50.
Clemson
.578
4
3
.536
35
 
105.
Eastern Michigan
.397
4
4
.397
130
51.
Texas A&M
.578
4
3
.536
36
 
106.
Vanderbilt
.394
2
6
.547
27
52.
Jacksonville St.
.576
6
2
.422
116
 
107.
Arkansas
.394
2
6
.547
28
53.
Arizona
.574
4
3
.531
41
 
108.
New Mexico
.388
3
4
.430
114
54.
Miami, Ohio
.561
6
2
.407
123
 
109.
Pittsburgh
.385
2
5
.514
61
55.
Mississippi State
.560
4
3
.518
53
 
110.
Cincinnati
.384
2
5
.514
62
56.
Syracuse
.560
4
3
.517
55
 
111.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.379
2
6
.531
38
57.
Ohio
.556
6
2
.403
129
 
112.
UAB
.371
2
6
.523
47
58.
N.C. State
.556
4
3
.513
64
 
113.
Fla. International
.370
4
4
.370
132
59.
BYU
.555
5
2
.424
115
 
114.
Army
.370
2
5
.498
76
60.
Boston College
.553
4
3
.510
66
 
115.
North Texas
.365
3
4
.405
126
61.
Marshall
.544
4
3
.501
71
 
116.
Buffalo
.360
3
5
.432
112
62.
Coastal Carolina
.543
4
3
.501
73
 
117.
Arizona State
.358
1
6
.582
8
63.
West Virginia
.539
4
3
.497
79
 
118.
Western Michigan
.347
2
6
.497
77
64.
SMU
.536
5
2
.406
125
 
119.
Charlotte
.344
2
5
.470
97
65.
Old Dominion
.532
4
3
.490
83
 
120.
Louisiana Tech
.344
3
5
.415
119
66.
Virginia Tech
.526
3
4
.569
13
 
121.
Ball State
.335
2
6
.483
87
67.
Illinois
.524
3
5
.598
5
 
122.
LA Monroe
.332
2
5
.457
102
68.
South Alabama
.522
4
3
.479
91
 
123.
Hawaii
.317
2
6
.463
100
69.
Western Kentucky
.521
4
3
.478
92
 
124.
Southern Miss
.308
1
6
.527
43
70.
Texas State
.521
5
2
.391
131
 
125.
UTEP
.306
2
6
.450
104
71.
TCU
.520
4
4
.520
51
 
126.
Nevada
.304
1
6
.522
49
72.
Louisiana 
.517
4
3
.474
95
 
127.
Temple
.298
2
6
.441
109
73.
California
.510
3
4
.553
22
 
128.
Connecticut
.288
1
6
.503
70
74.
Wake Forest
.508
4
3
.465
99
 
129.
Massachusetts
.276
1
7
.501
72
75.
Northwestern
.507
3
4
.550
24
 
130.
East Carolina
.243
1
6
.446
106
76.
Auburn
.505
3
4
.548
26
 
131.
Kent State
.222
1
7
.430
113
77.
Georgia Tech
.499
3
4
.542
30
 
132.
Sam Houston St.
.221
0
7
.531
40
78.
Purdue
.499
2
5
.628
1
 
133.
Akron
.211
1
7
.414
120
79.
UTSA
.484
4
3
.441
107
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
80.
Bowling Green
.483
4
4
.483
88
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2023 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved