Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Ohio St., Washington, & Michigan Top the List

  • Eight of the ten conferences are represented in the top-15
  • Oklahoma falls 10 spots after losing at Kansas, as the Jayhawks enter the top-25
  • Oregon rises 8 spots after winning at Utah
  • Last season’s #1 Georgia cracks the top-10 based on accomplishments to date, despite having played only 4 teams in the current top-100 and none in the current top-40
  • #5 James Madison, which is undefeated and beat #35 Troy on the road, has accomplished more than all but 4 teams to date
  • The Pac-12 and SEC are tied with 6 teams apiece in the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 30

Oct. 23 Rankings

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Ohio State
.837
8
0
.562
21
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Washington
.820
8
0
.532
42
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Michigan
.819
8
0
.531
43
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Florida State
.811
8
0
.517
58
0-0
1-0
0
5.
James Madison
.808
8
0
.513
60
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Texas
.788
7
1
.585
11
1-0
1-1
0
7.
Alabama
.774
7
1
.565
18
1-1
1-0
0
8.
Georgia
.773
8
0
.460
101
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Mississippi
.767
7
1
.555
25
0-1
0-0
0
10.
Oregon
.766
7
1
.554
26
0-1
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Oklahoma
.756
7
1
.540
35
  Big Ten
.628
33
9
.452
12.
Penn State
.749
7
1
.530
45
  Pac-12
.626
29
6
.421
13.
Liberty
.739
8
0
.415
125
  Southeastern
.602
35
8
.406
14.
Louisville
.736
7
1
.514
59
  Atlantic Coast
.572
34
14
.445
15.
Air Force
.733
8
0
.407
127
  Big 12
.566
30
12
.435
16.
Missouri
.733
7
1
.510
68
  Sun Belt
.527
33
17
.430
17.
USC
.724
7
2
.567
17
  Mountain West
.473
25
23
.460
18.
Utah
.723
6
2
.584
12
  American Athletic
.424
24
31
.462
19.
Iowa
.710
6
2
.569
16
  Conference USA
.412
14
17
.440
20.
Notre Dame
.701
7
2
.540
34
  Mid-American
.411
20
28
.460
21.
UCLA
.694
6
2
.550
28
  *non-conference play
22.
LSU
.691
6
2
.546
31
 
23.
Oregon State
.690
6
2
.545
33
 
24.
Kansas
.685
6
2
.540
36
 
25.
Tennessee
.680
6
2
.534
40
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Tulane
.675
7
1
.441
105
 
81.
Arkansas State
.479
4
4
.479
92
27.
Kansas State
.669
6
2
.521
54
 
82.
Purdue
.476
2
6
.628
1
28.
North Carolina
.668
6
2
.520
56
 
83.
San Jose State
.467
4
5
.500
77
29.
Wisconsin
.666
5
3
.596
6
 
84.
Texas Tech
.455
3
5
.530
46
30.
Fresno State
.665
7
1
.429
115
 
85.
Houston
.453
3
5
.528
49
31.
Oklahoma State
.662
6
2
.513
61
 
86.
New Mexico St.
.451
6
3
.354
133
32.
Minnesota
.662
5
3
.591
9
 
87.
Utah State
.446
3
5
.521
55
33.
Rutgers
.662
6
2
.513
62
 
88.
South Carolina
.445
2
6
.598
3
34.
Toledo
.659
7
1
.423
121
 
89.
Stanford
.445
2
6
.598
4
35.
Troy
.656
6
2
.507
73
 
90.
Arizona State
.444
2
6
.597
5
36.
Miami, Fla.
.648
6
2
.498
80
 
91.
Baylor
.443
3
5
.518
57
37.
Georgia Southern
.648
6
2
.497
81
 
92.
Michigan State
.440
2
6
.594
7
38.
Nebraska
.635
5
3
.563
20
 
93.
Appalachian St.
.436
4
4
.436
108
39.
Duke
.629
5
3
.556
24
 
94.
Indiana
.433
2
6
.586
10
40.
Arizona
.622
5
3
.549
29
 
95.
UCF
.433
3
5
.508
71
41.
Georgia State
.621
6
2
.469
97
 
96.
Northern Illinois
.431
4
4
.431
111
42.
Memphis
.616
6
2
.463
99
 
97.
South Florida
.431
4
4
.431
112
43.
Texas A&M
.609
5
3
.535
38
 
98.
Rice
.431
4
4
.431
113
44.
Florida
.603
5
3
.529
48
 
99.
Florida Atlantic
.430
4
4
.430
114
45.
Iowa State
.599
5
3
.524
51
 
100.
Navy
.426
3
4
.469
96
46.
UNLV
.596
6
2
.443
104
 
101.
Colorado State
.424
3
5
.499
78
47.
Miami, Ohio
.595
7
2
.424
119
 
102.
Virginia
.422
2
6
.575
14
48.
Colorado
.593
4
4
.593
8
 
103.
San Diego State
.419
3
5
.494
84
49.
N.C. State
.585
5
3
.510
67
 
104.
Tulsa
.414
3
5
.489
88
50.
Coastal Carolina
.583
5
3
.509
70
 
105.
Central Michigan
.394
4
4
.394
130
51.
Jacksonville St.
.583
7
2
.411
126
 
106.
Arkansas
.392
2
6
.545
32
52.
Wyoming
.577
5
3
.502
75
 
107.
Vanderbilt
.387
2
7
.559
22
53.
Washington State
.575
4
4
.575
15
 
108.
Pittsburgh
.385
2
6
.538
37
54.
Kentucky
.571
5
3
.496
83
 
109.
UAB
.382
2
6
.534
39
55.
West Virginia
.566
5
3
.490
86
 
110.
Western Michigan
.378
3
6
.477
93
56.
Maryland
.564
5
3
.489
87
 
111.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.377
2
6
.529
47
57.
Georgia Tech
.564
4
4
.564
19
 
112.
Cincinnati
.373
2
6
.525
50
58.
Boston College
.560
5
3
.485
90
 
113.
Eastern Michigan
.369
4
5
.400
129
59.
Auburn
.557
4
4
.557
23
 
114.
Nevada
.359
2
6
.510
69
60.
Northwestern
.553
4
4
.553
27
 
115.
Buffalo
.357
3
5
.429
116
61.
Virginia Tech
.549
4
4
.549
30
 
116.
North Texas
.354
3
5
.426
117
62.
Louisiana 
.547
5
3
.471
95
 
117.
Fla. International
.354
4
5
.385
132
63.
SMU
.545
6
2
.392
131
 
118.
New Mexico
.354
3
5
.425
118
64.
BYU
.543
5
3
.468
98
 
119.
UTEP
.341
3
6
.437
107
65.
Clemson
.532
4
4
.532
41
 
120.
Ball State
.339
2
6
.488
89
66.
Mississippi State
.531
4
4
.531
44
 
121.
Massachusetts
.330
2
7
.496
82
67.
Illinois
.526
3
5
.600
2
 
122.
Army
.327
2
6
.475
94
68.
Ohio
.525
6
3
.424
120
 
123.
Louisiana Tech
.321
3
6
.415
123
69.
Old Dominion
.524
4
4
.524
52
 
124.
LA Monroe
.309
2
6
.454
102
70.
TCU
.522
4
4
.522
53
 
125.
Charlotte
.303
2
6
.447
103
71.
Marshall
.513
4
4
.513
63
 
126.
Hawaii
.301
2
7
.463
100
72.
Wake Forest
.511
4
4
.511
64
 
127.
Temple
.293
2
6
.435
109
73.
Western Kentucky
.507
4
4
.507
72
 
128.
Southern Miss
.283
1
7
.511
66
74.
Syracuse
.503
4
4
.503
74
 
129.
Connecticut
.274
1
7
.498
79
75.
California
.502
3
5
.577
13
 
130.
East Carolina
.228
1
7
.437
106
76.
Boise State
.501
4
4
.501
76
 
131.
Kent State
.225
1
7
.434
110
77.
Texas State
.496
5
3
.421
122
 
132.
Sam Houston St.
.207
0
8
.511
65
78.
Bowling Green
.494
4
4
.494
85
 
133.
Akron
.206
1
7
.406
128
79.
UTSA
.490
5
3
.415
124
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
80.
South Alabama
.481
4
4
.481
91
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2023 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved