Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Huskies Remain #1

  • (11-0) Washington has accomplished more, by far, than any other team to date
  • Every other team with a schedule as tough as Washington’s has at least 4 losses—as the Huskies’ schedule has been tougher than any of the 1-loss teams’
  • Ohio State and Michigan flip, with the Buckeyes moving to #2 before the archrivals’ showdown in Ann Arbor
  • The 2 biggest gaps in the top-50 are between #1 Washington and #2 Ohio State (.024) and between #8 Alabama and #9 Louisville (.024), as 8 teams are set apart
  • Washington has more wins vs. the current top-25 (4) than #3 Michigan and #4 Georgia have combined (3), and more on the road (2 to 1)
  • Undefeated (#5) Florida State hasn’t played any of the other 3 best teams in the ACC, while Washington has played all 5 of the other best teams in the Pac-12
  • The Big Ten and Pac-12 lead the conference ratings at .612, edging the SEC (.609)
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 20

Nov. 13 Rankings
Nov. 6 Rankings
Oct. 30 Rankings
Oct. 23 Rankings

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Washington
.850
11
0
.585
12
1-0
3-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.826
11
0
.542
48
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Michigan
.822
11
0
.537
51
1-0
0-0
0
4.
Georgia
.815
11
0
.523
61
0-0
2-0
0
5.
Florida State
.810
11
0
.516
65
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Texas
.793
10
1
.567
22
1-0
1-1
0
7.
Oregon
.788
10
1
.559
31
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Alabama
.782
10
1
.550
39
0-1
2-0
0
9.
Louisville
.758
10
1
.517
64
0-0
1-0
1
10.
Penn State
.755
9
2
.580
15
0-2
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Liberty
.744
11
0
.420
116
  Big Ten
.612
33
9
.436
12.
Missouri
.742
9
2
.563
24
  Pac-12
.612
29
6
.407
13.
Iowa
.742
9
2
.563
25
  Southeastern
.609
43
9
.405
14.
Mississippi
.740
9
2
.560
29
  Atlantic Coast
.572
37
15
.443
15.
Oklahoma
.732
9
2
.550
38
  Big 12
.570
30
12
.439
16.
James Madison
.715
10
1
.461
99
  Sun Belt
.507
34
22
.442
17.
LSU
.709
8
3
.581
14
  Mountain West
.472
25
24
.466
18.
Arizona
.702
8
3
.574
17
  Conference USA
.437
18
19
.445
19.
Oregon State
.696
8
3
.567
21
  American Athletic
.420
24
31
.458
20.
Kansas State
.688
8
3
.558
33
  Mid-American
.398
20
28
.447
21.
Utah
.684
7
4
.608
5
  *non-conference play
22.
Toledo
.675
10
1
.414
120
 
23.
Tulane
.672
10
1
.411
121
 
24.
Notre Dame
.672
8
3
.539
50
 
25.
Troy
.671
9
2
.477
84
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
USC
.663
7
5
.617
3
 
81.
Bowling Green
.493
6
5
.466
91
27.
Oklahoma State
.662
8
3
.529
58
 
82.
Georgia Southern
.490
6
5
.463
96
28.
N.C. State
.650
8
3
.515
66
 
83.
Syracuse
.488
5
6
.515
67
29.
North Carolina
.649
8
3
.514
68
 
84.
Arizona State
.484
3
8
.621
1
30.
Tennessee
.641
7
4
.562
26
 
85.
Purdue
.482
3
8
.620
2
31.
UNLV
.641
9
2
.444
106
 
86.
UCF
.481
5
6
.509
70
32.
UCLA
.634
7
4
.554
34
 
87.
Stanford
.474
3
8
.612
4
33.
Kansas
.632
7
4
.553
35
 
88.
Marshall
.469
5
6
.496
73
34.
Clemson
.626
7
4
.546
45
 
89.
Wake Forest
.460
4
7
.543
47
35.
Texas A&M
.615
7
4
.534
53
 
90.
Texas State
.456
6
5
.429
115
36.
Rutgers
.605
6
5
.579
16
 
91.
Indiana
.451
3
8
.590
10
37.
West Virginia
.600
7
4
.519
63
 
92.
Houston
.451
4
7
.533
54
38.
Miami, Ohio
.593
9
2
.395
129
 
93.
Virginia
.448
3
8
.586
11
39.
Memphis
.592
8
3
.453
103
 
94.
Arkansas
.445
4
7
.527
59
40.
SMU
.590
9
2
.392
130
 
95.
Army
.443
5
6
.470
88
41.
Wisconsin
.590
6
5
.563
23
 
96.
Utah State
.437
5
6
.464
94
42.
Miami, Fla.
.588
6
5
.561
27
 
97.
Colorado State
.434
5
6
.461
98
43.
Duke
.585
6
5
.558
32
 
98.
Louisiana 
.428
5
6
.455
102
44.
Wyoming
.583
7
4
.501
71
 
99.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.411
4
7
.493
74
45.
Iowa State
.579
6
5
.552
36
 
100.
Pittsburgh
.411
3
8
.550
40
46.
Maryland
.578
6
5
.551
37
 
101.
Rice
.410
5
6
.437
109
47.
Northwestern
.577
6
5
.550
41
 
102.
South Florida
.405
5
6
.431
114
48.
Auburn
.575
6
5
.548
43
 
103.
Navy
.402
5
5
.402
127
49.
Fresno State
.572
8
3
.433
110
 
104.
Baylor
.394
3
8
.532
55
50.
Georgia Tech
.571
6
5
.544
46
 
105.
New Mexico
.393
4
7
.474
87
51.
California
.566
5
6
.593
8
 
106.
Western Michigan
.385
4
7
.465
92
52.
Minnesota
.565
5
6
.591
9
 
107.
Massachusetts
.383
3
8
.520
62
53.
Texas Tech
.562
6
5
.535
52
 
108.
UAB
.382
4
7
.462
97
54.
Coastal Carolina
.561
7
4
.479
82
 
109.
Hawaii
.378
4
8
.477
83
55.
Air Force
.559
8
3
.420
117
 
110.
Central Michigan
.378
5
6
.404
125
56.
Kentucky
.558
6
5
.531
56
 
111.
Cincinnati
.376
3
8
.513
69
57.
Illinois
.556
5
6
.583
13
 
112.
Northern Illinois
.373
5
6
.399
128
58.
New Mexico St.
.555
9
3
.402
126
 
113.
Vanderbilt
.372
2
9
.570
20
59.
Jacksonville St.
.554
8
3
.415
119
 
114.
Ball State
.364
4
7
.444
107
60.
Appalachian St.
.550
7
4
.468
89
 
115.
Eastern Michigan
.363
5
6
.388
131
61.
UTSA
.545
8
3
.406
123
 
116.
Southern Miss
.355
3
8
.491
75
62.
Washington State
.545
5
6
.572
18
 
117.
North Texas
.354
4
7
.433
111
63.
South Carolina
.543
5
6
.570
19
 
118.
Florida Atlantic
.354
4
7
.433
112
64.
Florida
.533
5
6
.560
28
 
119.
San Diego State
.334
3
8
.468
90
65.
Virginia Tech
.532
5
6
.560
30
 
120.
Tulsa
.331
3
8
.464
95
66.
Colorado
.522
4
7
.603
6
 
121.
Fla. International
.328
4
7
.405
124
67.
Mississippi State
.521
5
6
.548
42
 
122.
UTEP
.326
3
8
.459
100
68.
Nebraska
.520
5
6
.547
44
 
123.
Buffalo
.315
3
8
.446
105
69.
Ohio
.519
8
3
.381
133
 
124.
LA Monroe
.309
2
9
.501
72
70.
Michigan State
.518
4
7
.599
7
 
125.
Charlotte
.303
3
8
.433
113
71.
Boise State
.516
6
5
.489
77
 
126.
Connecticut
.300
2
9
.489
76
72.
San Jose State
.516
6
5
.489
78
 
127.
Louisiana Tech
.299
3
9
.442
108
73.
Boston College
.514
6
5
.487
79
 
128.
Temple
.291
3
8
.418
118
74.
Georgia State
.513
6
5
.486
80
 
129.
Nevada
.280
2
9
.465
93
75.
TCU
.513
5
6
.540
49
 
130.
East Carolina
.272
2
9
.456
101
76.
South Alabama
.508
6
5
.481
81
 
131.
Sam Houston St.
.268
2
9
.451
104
77.
Old Dominion
.503
5
6
.531
57
 
132.
Akron
.216
2
9
.381
132
78.
Arkansas State
.502
6
5
.475
85
 
133.
Kent State
.191
1
10
.410
122
79.
Western Kentucky
.501
6
5
.474
86
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
80.
BYU
.498
5
6
.525
60
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2023 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved