Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Washington Huskies Are #1

  • Undefeated Washington’s win at now-#18 USC vaults the Huskies into the top spot in the rankings—as UW has played the 17th-toughest schedule and is the only undefeated team with a win over the current top-10 (#10 Oregon)
  • Ohio State, whose win at Notre Dame has lost a bit of its luster as the Irish have fallen out of the top-25, drops to #2 but is still undefeated while playing the 30th-toughest schedule to date
  • The other 5 remaining undefeated teams have all played schedules ranked outside of the top-60
  • The Pac-12 is the only conference with 5 teams in the top-20
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 6

Oct. 30 Rankings
Oct. 23 Rankings

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Washington
.841
9
0
.570
17
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.834
9
0
.556
30
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Michigan
.809
9
0
.514
61
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Florida State
.808
9
0
.513
62
0-0
1-0
0
5.
James Madison
.808
9
0
.512
65
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Georgia
.797
9
0
.495
79
0-0
1-0
0
7.
Texas
.796
8
1
.586
11
1-0
1-1
0
8.
Alabama
.789
8
1
.576
16
1-1
2-0
0
9.
Mississippi
.779
8
1
.561
24
0-1
1-0
0
10.
Oregon
.774
8
1
.555
31
0-1
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Penn State
.770
8
1
.549
37
  Big Ten
.628
33
9
.452
12.
Louisville
.754
8
1
.527
51
  Pac-12
.626
29
6
.421
13.
Liberty
.730
9
0
.403
126
  Southeastern
.602
35
8
.406
14.
Utah
.723
7
2
.566
20
  Atlantic Coast
.572
34
14
.445
15.
Iowa
.719
7
2
.561
25
  Big 12
.566
30
12
.435
16.
Oklahoma
.713
7
2
.554
32
  Sun Belt
.527
33
17
.430
17.
Kansas
.704
7
2
.543
42
  Mountain West
.473
25
23
.460
18.
USC
.702
7
3
.590
9
  American Athletic
.424
24
31
.462
19.
Oregon State
.701
7
2
.540
44
  Conference USA
.412
14
17
.440
20.
Missouri
.701
7
2
.540
45
  Mid-American
.411
20
28
.460
21.
Oklahoma State
.695
7
2
.533
47
  *non-conference play
22.
Troy
.683
7
2
.519
57
 
23.
LSU
.681
6
3
.588
10
 
24.
Tennessee
.677
7
2
.512
66
 
25.
Fresno State
.674
8
1
.429
114
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Tulane
.671
8
1
.425
116
 
81.
TCU
.491
4
5
.524
54
27.
Notre Dame
.664
7
3
.548
41
 
82.
Wake Forest
.487
4
5
.521
56
28.
Arizona
.660
6
3
.565
21
 
83.
South Carolina
.484
3
6
.584
13
29.
Toledo
.660
8
1
.413
124
 
84.
Syracuse
.482
4
5
.515
60
30.
UCLA
.656
6
3
.559
27
 
85.
New Mexico St.
.479
7
3
.360
133
31.
Kansas State
.655
6
3
.558
28
 
86.
Boise State
.478
4
5
.511
68
32.
North Carolina
.651
7
2
.482
91
 
87.
South Alabama
.471
4
5
.504
71
33.
Duke
.646
6
3
.548
38
 
88.
Appalachian St.
.470
5
4
.437
108
34.
Rutgers
.645
6
3
.548
40
 
89.
Marshall
.468
4
5
.502
72
35.
Air Force
.644
8
1
.396
129
 
90.
Purdue
.468
2
7
.637
1
36.
Memphis
.620
7
2
.449
102
 
91.
Utah State
.465
4
5
.498
74
37.
N.C. State
.617
6
3
.518
58
 
92.
San Jose State
.463
4
5
.497
75
38.
Wisconsin
.616
5
4
.584
12
 
93.
UCF
.455
4
5
.488
88
39.
Miami, Fla.
.612
6
3
.512
64
 
94.
Arkansas
.449
3
6
.550
35
40.
Minnesota
.610
5
4
.578
15
 
95.
Arizona State
.441
2
7
.612
2
41.
West Virginia
.606
6
3
.506
70
 
96.
Central Michigan
.429
5
4
.397
128
42.
Coastal Carolina
.600
6
3
.500
73
 
97.
Baylor
.416
3
6
.517
59
43.
Texas A&M
.599
5
4
.566
18
 
98.
UAB
.411
3
6
.512
67
44.
Kentucky
.597
6
3
.496
76
 
99.
South Florida
.410
4
5
.443
106
45.
UNLV
.596
7
2
.425
118
 
100.
Virginia
.409
2
7
.581
14
46.
Wyoming
.593
6
3
.492
83
 
101.
Rice
.408
4
5
.441
107
47.
Georgia State
.593
6
3
.492
84
 
102.
Florida Atlantic
.399
4
5
.431
113
48.
Miami, Ohio
.589
7
2
.418
122
 
103.
Army
.395
3
6
.495
78
49.
Boston College
.589
6
3
.489
86
 
104.
Colorado State
.393
3
6
.493
81
50.
Georgia Southern
.589
6
3
.488
87
 
105.
Pittsburgh
.389
2
7
.560
26
51.
Georgia Tech
.586
5
4
.553
33
 
106.
Northern Illinois
.389
4
5
.421
120
52.
Auburn
.582
5
4
.549
36
 
107.
Vanderbilt
.380
2
8
.566
19
53.
Nebraska
.581
5
4
.548
39
 
108.
San Diego State
.379
3
6
.478
94
54.
Clemson
.575
5
4
.542
43
 
109.
Western Michigan
.375
3
6
.473
95
55.
Iowa State
.566
5
4
.533
48
 
110.
Tulsa
.366
3
6
.465
99
56.
Maryland
.565
5
4
.532
49
 
111.
Massachusetts
.366
3
7
.485
89
57.
Florida
.563
5
4
.530
50
 
112.
Navy
.363
3
5
.436
109
58.
Illinois
.562
4
5
.595
6
 
113.
Eastern Michigan
.358
4
5
.389
130
59.
Colorado
.561
4
5
.593
8
 
114.
Fla. International
.352
4
5
.383
132
60.
SMU
.555
7
2
.384
131
 
115.
New Mexico
.350
3
6
.447
103
61.
Jacksonville St.
.539
7
3
.418
121
 
116.
Buffalo
.348
3
6
.444
105
62.
Texas State
.534
6
3
.433
111
 
117.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.344
2
7
.512
63
63.
Washington State
.530
4
5
.564
22
 
118.
Cincinnati
.342
2
7
.510
69
64.
Northwestern
.529
4
5
.562
23
 
119.
Hawaii
.337
3
7
.454
101
65.
UTSA
.527
6
3
.426
115
 
120.
North Texas
.337
3
6
.432
112
66.
BYU
.525
5
4
.492
85
 
121.
Charlotte
.330
3
6
.425
117
67.
Virginia Tech
.524
4
5
.557
29
 
122.
UTEP
.330
3
7
.445
104
68.
Mississippi State
.519
4
5
.552
34
 
123.
Temple
.329
3
6
.424
119
69.
Arkansas State
.516
5
4
.482
90
 
124.
Southern Miss
.329
2
7
.495
77
70.
Western Kentucky
.515
5
4
.481
92
 
125.
Nevada
.328
2
7
.494
80
71.
Bowling Green
.512
5
4
.479
93
 
126.
Ball State
.327
2
7
.493
82
72.
Ohio
.507
6
3
.406
125
 
127.
Louisiana Tech
.320
3
7
.435
110
73.
Louisiana 
.503
5
4
.470
96
 
128.
LA Monroe
.297
2
7
.458
100
74.
Texas Tech
.502
4
5
.535
46
 
129.
Connecticut
.284
1
8
.522
55
75.
Indiana
.501
3
6
.601
3
 
130.
Akron
.248
2
7
.397
127
76.
California
.498
3
6
.598
4
 
131.
Sam Houston St.
.241
1
8
.466
97
77.
Stanford
.497
3
6
.597
5
 
132.
East Carolina
.241
1
8
.466
98
78.
Old Dominion
.494
4
5
.527
52
 
133.
Kent State
.206
1
8
.417
123
79.
Houston
.493
4
5
.527
53
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
80.
Michigan State
.493
3
6
.593
7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2023 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved