Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Unbeaten or Twice-Beaten

  • Amazingly, there are now 6 undefeated teams but not a single 1-loss team
  • Florida holds on to the top spot for the 5th-straight week
  • With a 3-0 week in non-conference play, the SEC takes over the top spot in the conference rankings
  • In a battle of directional powers, #119 Western Kentucky edges #120 Eastern Michigan to avoid the bottom spot
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has by far the most meaningful regular season in all of sports, and this regular season will finish with a banner week: #19 Oregon St. at #7 Oregon, #4 Cincinnati at #14 Pittsburgh, #3 Texas vs. #25 Nebraska, and #1 Florida vs. #2 Alabama
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 29

Nov. 22 Rankings
Nov. 15 Rankings
Nov. 8 Rankings
Nov. 1 Rankings
Oct. 25 Rankings
Oct. 18 Rankings
Oct. 11 Rankings
Oct. 4 Rankings

Final 2008-09 Rankings
2008 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida
.829
12
0
.548
31
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Alabama
.823
12
0
.538
36
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Texas
.813
12
0
.520
48
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Cincinnati
.812
11
0
.519
49
0-0
2-0
0
5.
TCU
.802
12
0
.503
64
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Boise State
.774
12
0
.461
85
1-0
0-0
0
7.
Oregon
.755
9
2
.579
10
0-1
2-1
0
8.
Iowa
.738
10
2
.547
32
0-1
2-0
1
9.
Ohio State
.731
10
2
.538
37
1-0
2-1
1
10.
Georgia Tech
.722
10
2
.527
44
0-0
1-2
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. LSU
.719
9
3
.579
9
  Southeastern
.631
42
6
.393
12. USC
.706
8
3
.578
11
  Pac-10
.623
21
9
.503
13. Penn State
.704
10
2
.505
60
  Big East
.603
32
8
.417
14. Pittsburgh
.697
9
2
.507
57
  Big Ten
.552
31
11
.407
15. Virginia Tech
.696
9
3
.552
28
  Big 12
.552
35
13
.412
16. BYU
.686
10
2
.483
74
  Atlantic Coast
.546
30
18
.471
17. Miami, Fla.
.685
9
3
.539
35
  Mountain West
.491
21
15
.441
18. Oklahoma State
.683
9
3
.537
38
  WAC
.458
18
19
.466
19. Oregon State
.682
8
3
.551
29
  Conference USA
.434
19
29
.496
20. California
.675
8
3
.543
33
  Mid-American
.364
16
36
.478
21. West Virginia
.668
8
3
.535
40
  Sun Belt
.363
8
28
.533
22. Wisconsin
.662
8
3
.528
42
  *non-conference play
23. Stanford
.661
8
4
.565
19
 
24. Georgia
.654
7
5
.607
2
 
25. Nebraska
.652
9
3
.503
65
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Arizona
.645
7
4
.567
17
 
74.
Kansas
.465
5
7
.515
51
27.
Utah
.643
9
3
.492
70
 
75.
Southern Miss
.464
7
5
.414
107
28.
Arkansas
.639
7
5
.592
5
 
76.
Michigan
.458
5
7
.508
56
29.
Houston
.631
10
2
.423
99
 
77.
Baylor
.456
4
8
.557
23
30.
South Carolina
.629
7
5
.581
8
 
78.
N.C. State
.455
5
7
.505
59
31.
Clemson
.626
8
4
.528
43
 
79.
Louisville
.454
4
8
.555
27
32.
Auburn
.624
7
5
.576
13
 
80.
UNLV
.450
5
7
.500
66
33.
Mississippi
.621
8
4
.522
45
 
81.
Marshall
.440
6
6
.440
92
34.
Tennessee
.621
7
5
.572
14
 
82.
Hawaii
.436
6
6
.436
94
35.
Missouri
.620
8
4
.521
46
 
83.
Northern Illinois
.428
7
5
.379
114
36.
Texas Tech
.612
8
4
.512
52
 
84.
Illinois
.427
3
8
.566
18
37.
Oklahoma
.606
7
5
.557
24
 
85.
Duke
.418
5
7
.468
80
38.
Kentucky
.605
7
5
.556
26
 
86.
Indiana
.409
4
8
.509
54
39.
North Carolina
.605
8
4
.505
61
 
87.
LA Monroe
.406
6
6
.406
110
40.
Rutgers
.600
8
3
.462
84
 
88.
LA Lafayette
.405
6
6
.405
111
41.
South Florida
.588
7
4
.507
58
 
89.
Colorado
.404
3
9
.558
22
42.
Boston College
.588
8
4
.488
72
 
90.
UAB
.393
5
7
.442
91
43.
Central Michigan
.587
10
2
.379
115
 
91.
Virginia
.388
3
9
.541
34
44.
Northwestern
.584
8
4
.484
73
 
92.
Utah State
.384
4
8
.483
75
45.
Connecticut
.583
6
5
.557
25
 
93.
San Diego State
.380
4
8
.479
76
46.
UCLA
.583
6
6
.583
6
 
94.
Vanderbilt
.373
2
10
.582
7
47.
Minnesota
.576
6
6
.576
12
 
95.
Tulsa
.373
5
7
.421
101
48.
Mississippi State
.570
5
7
.618
1
 
96.
Buffalo
.368
5
7
.415
105
49.
Troy
.568
9
3
.415
106
 
97.
Louisiana Tech
.366
3
8
.503
62
50.
Nevada
.566
8
4
.465
82
 
98.
Toledo
.365
5
7
.413
108
51.
Florida State
.565
6
6
.565
20
 
99.
Army
.351
5
6
.376
116
52.
Fresno State
.559
7
4
.477
79
 
100.
Florida Atlantic
.347
4
7
.425
98
53.
Notre Dame
.558
6
6
.558
21
 
101.
Colorado State
.343
3
9
.492
68
54.
Navy
.557
8
4
.456
86
 
102.
Kent State
.340
5
7
.387
113
55.
East Carolina
.544
8
4
.443
88
 
103.
Fla. International
.333
3
8
.467
81
56.
Central Florida
.543
8
4
.442
90
 
104.
Washington State
.332
1
11
.599
4
57.
Michigan State
.535
6
6
.535
39
 
105.
UTEP
.324
4
8
.419
104
58.
Texas A&M
.531
6
6
.531
41
 
106.
San Jose State
.317
2
9
.509
53
59.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.528
9
3
.376
117
 
107.
Maryland
.315
2
10
.518
50
60.
Air Force
.528
7
5
.478
78
 
108.
Western Michigan
.314
5
7
.359
119
61.
Ohio
.528
9
3
.376
118
 
109.
Arkansas State
.307
3
8
.436
93
62.
Washington
.523
4
7
.604
3
 
110.
Tulane
.304
3
9
.448
87
63.
Temple
.509
9
3
.358
120
 
111.
Akron
.289
3
9
.430
96
64.
Iowa State
.503
6
6
.503
63
 
112.
Rice
.282
2
10
.479
77
65.
Purdue
.501
5
7
.551
30
 
113.
New Mexico State
.281
3
9
.420
103
66.
Idaho
.493
7
5
.443
89
 
114.
Memphis
.270
2
10
.463
83
67.
Kansas State
.492
6
6
.492
69
 
115.
New Mexico
.256
1
11
.508
55
68.
Wyoming
.490
6
6
.490
71
 
116.
Miami, Ohio
.248
1
11
.498
67
69.
Bowling Green
.484
7
5
.434
95
 
117.
North Texas
.228
2
10
.408
109
70.
Wake Forest
.471
5
7
.521
47
 
118.
Ball State
.218
2
10
.394
112
71.
Arizona State
.471
4
8
.572
15
 
119.
Western Kentucky
.157
0
11
.428
97
72.
SMU
.470
7
5
.421
102
 
120.
Eastern Michigan
.154
0
12
.422
100
73.
Syracuse
.469
4
8
.570
16
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2009 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved