Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

The Top-5 Have Separated from the Pack

  • Five teams currently have ratings over .800 and are separated from each other by only .023, while being .040 ahead of everyone else
  • Quite unusually, there are now six undefeated teams but only two 1-loss teams
  • Perhaps equally unusually, this year's Big Game (Cal-Stanford) involves two ranked (top-25) teams
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has by far the most meaningful regular season in all of sports, and next week will feature two more top-25 matchups: #9 Oregon at #25 Arizona, and #22 Cal at #20 Stanford
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 15

Nov. 8 Rankings

Nov. 1 Rankings

Oct. 25 Rankings

Oct. 18 Rankings

Oct. 11 Rankings

Oct. 4 Rankings

Final 2008-09 Rankings
2008 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida
.832
10
0
.552
27
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Alabama
.826
10
0
.543
31
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Texas
.817
10
0
.527
44
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Cincinnati
.815
10
0
.524
47
0-0
1-0
0
5.
TCU
.809
10
0
.515
51
0-0
2-0
0
6.
Boise State
.769
10
0
.454
87
1-0
0-0
0
7.
Georgia Tech
.764
10
1
.524
46
0-0
2-1
0
8.
LSU
.744
8
2
.578
9
0-2
1-0
0
9.
Oregon
.741
8
2
.573
12
0-1
3-1
0
10.
Pittsburgh
.739
9
1
.498
63
0-0
0-0
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Ohio State
.738
9
2
.557
22
  Pac-10
.623
20
9
.509
12. Iowa
.724
9
2
.540
35
  Southeastern
.614
37
6
.387
13. Wisconsin
.711
8
2
.536
39
  Big East
.600
30
7
.407
14. Oklahoma State
.708
8
2
.533
42
  Big Ten
.568
31
10
.411
15. Virginia Tech
.696
7
3
.584
5
  Big 12
.551
35
13
.411
16. USC
.695
7
3
.583
6
  Atlantic Coast
.549
29
15
.452
17. Penn State
.695
9
2
.505
59
  Mountain West
.496
21
15
.446
18. Oregon State
.684
7
3
.570
15
  WAC
.454
17
19
.471
19. Miami, Fla.
.672
7
3
.556
23
  Conference USA
.430
19
29
.493
20. Stanford
.669
7
3
.553
26
  Mid-American
.370
16
36
.484
21. Utah
.662
8
2
.479
72
  Sun Belt
.368
8
26
.530
22. California
.654
7
3
.537
38
  *non-conference play
23. Clemson
.653
7
3
.536
40
 
24. Georgia
.651
6
4
.595
4
 
25. Arizona
.650
6
3
.554
25
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
BYU
.646
8
2
.462
79
 
74.
Michigan
.480
5
6
.507
57
27.
Houston
.640
8
2
.456
86
 
75.
Wyoming
.473
5
5
.473
75
28.
West Virginia
.632
7
3
.513
52
 
76.
Ohio
.470
7
3
.352
120
29.
Rutgers
.632
7
2
.461
80
 
77.
Wake Forest
.465
4
7
.547
28
30.
Arkansas
.631
6
4
.574
11
 
78.
LA Monroe
.462
6
4
.402
111
31.
Nebraska
.628
7
3
.509
54
 
79.
Duke
.459
5
5
.459
82
32.
Boston College
.628
7
3
.509
55
 
80.
Marshall
.446
5
5
.446
93
33.
North Carolina
.627
7
3
.507
56
 
81.
Bowling Green
.445
5
5
.445
95
34.
Notre Dame
.621
6
4
.563
20
 
82.
Syracuse
.444
3
7
.566
17
35.
Auburn
.621
7
4
.540
34
 
83.
Indiana
.438
4
7
.520
49
36.
Navy
.611
8
3
.473
74
 
84.
N.C. State
.432
4
6
.492
67
37.
Mississippi
.610
7
3
.490
68
 
85.
UAB
.428
5
5
.428
105
38.
Kentucky
.600
6
4
.541
33
 
86.
UNLV
.424
4
7
.507
58
39.
South Carolina
.599
6
5
.572
14
 
87.
Illinois
.424
3
7
.546
29
40.
South Florida
.596
6
3
.495
65
 
88.
Colorado
.419
3
7
.540
36
41.
Oklahoma
.594
6
4
.535
41
 
89.
Virginia
.417
3
7
.539
37
42.
Minnesota
.588
6
5
.562
21
 
90.
San Diego State
.412
4
6
.471
77
43.
Central Michigan
.588
8
2
.401
112
 
91.
Colorado State
.402
3
7
.523
48
44.
Missouri
.585
6
4
.526
45
 
92.
LA Lafayette
.392
5
5
.392
113
45.
Nevada
.582
7
3
.460
81
 
93.
Kent State
.388
5
5
.388
115
46.
UCLA
.582
5
5
.582
7
 
94.
Tulsa
.388
4
5
.420
107
47.
Tennessee
.576
5
5
.576
10
 
95.
Toledo
.383
4
6
.442
99
48.
Florida State
.567
5
5
.567
16
 
96.
Hawaii
.379
4
6
.437
103
49.
Michigan State
.559
6
5
.532
43
 
97.
Louisiana Tech
.378
3
7
.498
64
50.
Texas Tech
.559
6
4
.499
62
 
98.
Vanderbilt
.375
2
9
.573
13
51.
Mississippi State
.559
4
6
.617
2
 
99.
Western Michigan
.364
5
6
.389
114
52.
Northwestern
.558
7
4
.476
73
 
100.
Army
.351
4
6
.408
110
53.
Air Force
.553
7
4
.471
78
 
101.
Florida Atlantic
.346
3
6
.443
96
54.
Troy
.552
7
3
.430
104
 
102.
Washington State
.344
1
9
.599
3
55.
Fresno State
.545
6
4
.484
70
 
103.
Maryland
.335
2
8
.517
50
56.
Idaho
.540
7
4
.457
83
 
104.
Utah State
.335
3
7
.451
91
57.
Temple
.538
8
2
.354
119
 
105.
UTEP
.330
3
7
.445
94
58.
Connecticut
.532
4
5
.565
18
 
106.
Tulane
.327
3
7
.442
97
59.
Iowa State
.528
6
5
.501
61
 
107.
Fla. International
.326
3
7
.441
101
60.
Washington
.524
3
7
.642
1
 
108.
Buffalo
.323
3
7
.438
102
61.
Central Florida
.514
6
4
.453
88
 
109.
San Jose State
.301
1
8
.542
32
62.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.509
7
3
.388
116
 
110.
New Mexico State
.301
3
7
.413
109
63.
Texas A&M
.504
5
5
.504
60
 
111.
Arkansas State
.296
2
7
.457
84
64.
Arizona State
.503
4
6
.563
19
 
112.
Memphis
.280
2
8
.452
89
65.
SMU
.502
6
4
.442
100
 
113.
Akron
.279
2
8
.451
92
66.
Kansas State
.499
6
5
.472
76
 
114.
Miami, Ohio
.263
1
10
.512
53
67.
Purdue
.497
4
7
.579
8
 
115.
North Texas
.251
2
8
.416
108
68.
Baylor
.494
4
6
.554
24
 
116.
Rice
.250
1
9
.487
69
69.
East Carolina
.490
5
4
.457
85
 
117.
New Mexico
.196
0
10
.494
66
70.
Northern Illinois
.486
7
3
.367
118
 
118.
Ball State
.181
1
9
.386
117
71.
Louisville
.484
4
6
.544
30
 
119.
Eastern Michigan
.171
0
10
.452
90
72.
Southern Miss
.482
6
4
.422
106
 
120.
Western Kentucky
.165
0
10
.442
98
73.
Kansas
.480
5
5
.480
71
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2009 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved