Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

In Dramatic Fashion, Iowa Moves to #1

  • The Hawkeyes edge #2 Florida by .001
  • TCU cracks the top-5
  • There is a canyon (.048) separating #10 Boise St. from #12 Virginia Tech (with Georgia Tech in the middle, separated by more than .020 from the teams on either side) — while only .013 separates #6 from #10, and #13 from #18
  • With seven teams with ratings over .600, the Pac-10 is the top conference to date
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has by far the most meaningful regular season in all of sports, and Halloween night will feature three more top-25 matchups: #8 USC at #9 Oregon, #5 Texas at #18 Oklahoma St., and #2 Florida vs. #25 Georgia
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 25

Oct. 18 Rankings

Oct. 11 Rankings

Oct. 4 Rankings

Final 2008-09 Rankings

2008 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Iowa
.839
8
0
.565
19
0-0
3-0
0
2.
Florida
.838
7
0
.565
20
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Alabama
.829
8
0
.547
29
0-0
2-0
0
4.
TCU
.806
7
0
.510
44
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Texas
.803
7
0
.505
49
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Cincinnati
.787
7
0
.481
64
0-0
0-0
0
7.
LSU
.785
6
1
.594
8
0-1
1-0
0
8.
USC
.781
6
1
.587
11
0-0
2-0
0
9.
Oregon
.776
6
1
.581
14
0-1
1-0
0
10.
Boise State
.774
7
0
.461
85
1-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Georgia Tech
.753
7
1
.536
34
  Pac-10
.645
20
8
.518
12. Virginia Tech
.726
5
2
.610
4
  Southeastern
.629
28
5
.410
13. Penn State
.710
7
1
.481
65
  Big East
.584
28
7
.398
14. Notre Dame
.708
5
2
.589
9
  Big Ten
.583
28
10
.438
15. Pittsburgh
.708
7
1
.479
69
  Big 12
.561
34
13
.425
16. Arizona
.702
5
2
.582
13
  Atlantic Coast
.522
25
15
.447
17. Utah
.700
6
1
.483
63
  Mountain West
.499
20
15
.456
18. Oklahoma State
.697
6
1
.479
68
  WAC
.465
17
17
.465
19. West Virginia
.696
6
1
.478
71
  Conference USA
.431
18
25
.480
20. Houston
.688
6
1
.469
77
  Sun Belt
.377
8
23
.524
21. Ohio State
.688
6
2
.543
30
  Mid-American
.363
15
33
.474
22. Wisconsin
.687
5
2
.564
21
  *non-conference play
23. South Carolina
.681
6
2
.535
36
 
24. Miami, Fla.
.677
5
2
.553
26
 
25. Georgia
.656
4
3
.617
3
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
California
.651
5
2
.525
39
 
74.
Baylor
.464
3
4
.507
47
27.
Kentucky
.647
4
3
.606
5
 
75.
Duke
.463
4
3
.421
104
28.
BYU
.644
6
2
.493
55
 
76.
East Carolina
.463
4
3
.420
105
29.
Central Michigan
.635
7
1
.397
115
 
77.
UTEP
.462
3
4
.505
48
30.
Auburn
.633
5
3
.560
23
 
78.
Colorado State
.461
3
5
.536
33
31.
Mississippi
.622
5
2
.493
56
 
79.
LA Lafayette
.459
4
3
.417
107
32.
Navy
.614
6
2
.461
84
 
80.
Virginia
.453
3
4
.496
52
33.
Stanford
.613
5
3
.540
31
 
81.
SMU
.451
3
4
.494
54
34.
Clemson
.612
4
3
.570
17
 
82.
Louisville
.448
2
5
.578
16
35.
Washington
.604
3
5
.674
1
 
83.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.447
4
3
.405
111
36.
Oregon State
.601
4
3
.560
24
 
84.
Ohio
.442
5
3
.370
119
37.
Kansas
.601
5
2
.471
76
 
85.
Tulsa
.441
4
3
.399
114
38.
Idaho
.599
6
2
.446
94
 
86.
Toledo
.437
4
4
.437
98
39.
Boston College
.595
5
3
.520
40
 
87.
Colorado
.437
2
5
.568
18
40.
Minnesota
.588
4
4
.588
10
 
88.
Indiana
.436
4
4
.436
99
41.
Michigan
.587
5
3
.512
43
 
89.
N.C. State
.436
3
4
.478
70
42.
Arkansas
.585
3
4
.626
2
 
90.
San Diego State
.430
3
4
.473
74
43.
Oklahoma
.582
4
3
.539
32
 
91.
Central Florida
.429
4
3
.388
117
44.
South Florida
.577
5
2
.446
93
 
92.
Western Michigan
.419
4
4
.419
106
45.
Nebraska
.570
4
3
.527
37
 
93.
Bowling Green
.405
3
5
.480
67
46.
Iowa State
.566
5
3
.491
57
 
94.
Kent State
.393
4
4
.393
116
47.
UCLA
.559
3
4
.601
6
 
95.
Louisiana Tech
.391
3
4
.433
101
48.
Arizona State
.558
4
3
.515
42
 
96.
UNLV
.386
3
5
.459
87
49.
Tennessee
.558
3
4
.599
7
 
97.
Florida Atlantic
.385
2
4
.484
62
50.
Troy
.554
5
2
.423
103
 
98.
Arkansas State
.378
2
4
.477
72
51.
Missouri
.552
4
3
.509
45
 
99.
Buffalo
.378
3
5
.451
92
52.
Michigan State
.550
4
4
.550
27
 
100.
Vanderbilt
.366
2
6
.518
41
53.
Rutgers
.545
5
2
.415
108
 
101.
Washington State
.355
1
6
.580
15
54.
Connecticut
.541
4
3
.498
50
 
102.
San Jose State
.347
1
5
.554
25
55.
Nevada
.539
4
3
.497
51
 
103.
Utah State
.346
2
5
.472
75
56.
Texas Tech
.539
5
3
.464
80
 
104.
UAB
.343
2
5
.469
78
57.
Fresno State
.531
4
3
.488
59
 
105.
Maryland
.337
2
6
.486
61
58.
Marshall
.528
5
3
.453
90
 
106.
Hawaii
.336
2
5
.462
82
59.
Kansas State
.527
5
3
.452
91
 
107.
Tulane
.336
2
5
.461
83
60.
Texas A&M
.520
4
3
.477
73
 
108.
Army
.334
3
5
.405
112
61.
Mississippi State
.512
3
5
.587
12
 
109.
New Mexico State
.333
3
5
.403
113
62.
LA Monroe
.506
4
3
.463
81
 
110.
Memphis
.318
2
5
.442
96
63.
Florida State
.505
3
4
.548
28
 
111.
Illinois
.308
1
6
.526
38
64.
North Carolina
.499
4
3
.456
88
 
112.
Fla. International
.270
1
6
.480
66
65.
Air Force
.495
4
4
.495
53
 
113.
Akron
.257
1
6
.464
79
66.
Northwestern
.487
5
3
.412
109
 
114.
North Texas
.254
1
6
.460
86
67.
Wake Forest
.486
4
4
.486
60
 
115.
Miami, Ohio
.224
0
8
.536
35
68.
Purdue
.485
3
5
.561
22
 
116.
Rice
.192
0
8
.488
58
69.
Southern Miss
.479
5
3
.405
110
 
117.
Ball State
.186
1
7
.377
118
70.
Northern Illinois
.478
4
3
.435
100
 
118.
New Mexico
.173
0
7
.456
89
71.
Temple
.477
5
2
.350
120
 
119.
Western Kentucky
.166
0
7
.443
95
72.
Wyoming
.472
4
3
.430
102
 
120.
Eastern Michigan
.162
0
7
.437
97
73.
Syracuse
.465
3
4
.508
46
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2009 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved