Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Florida Vaults from #7 to #1

  • Alabama is a close second, as anticipation already begins to build for a possible SEC Championship Game matchup
  • With 9 above-average teams and 7 in the current top-40, the Pac-10 is the top conference
  • The state of Idaho has two teams in the top-20
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 11

Oct. 4 Rankings

Final 2008-09 Rankings

2008 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida
.839
5
0
.565
18
1-0
0-0
0
2.
Alabama
.834
6
0
.556
22
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Iowa
.807
6
0
.511
41
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Boise State
.804
5
0
.507
44
1-0
0-0
0
5.
Texas
.780
5
0
.470
72
0-0
0-0
0
6.
LSU
.779
5
1
.602
4
0-1
1-0
0
7.
Cincinnati
.778
5
0
.467
77
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Virginia Tech
.778
5
1
.600
5
0-1
2-0
0
9.
Oregon
.756
5
1
.570
10
0-1
1-0
0
10.
TCU
.756
5
0
.436
101
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Kansas
.752
5
0
.431
104
  Pac-10
.635
19
8
.513
12. USC
.741
4
1
.574
9
  Southeastern
.627
25
5
.419
13. Miami, Fla.
.735
4
1
.566
16
  Big Ten
.582
27
10
.441
14. Wisconsin
.730
5
1
.536
29
  Big East
.577
25
7
.403
15. Ohio State
.726
5
1
.531
33
  Big 12
.571
34
13
.434
16. Notre Dame
.723
4
1
.551
24
  Atlantic Coast
.533
24
13
.443
17. Nebraska
.709
4
1
.535
30
  Mountain West
.497
20
15
.454
18. Georgia Tech
.700
5
1
.500
47
  WAC
.466
16
17
.475
19. Auburn
.699
5
1
.498
48
  Conference USA
.443
18
20
.458
20. Idaho
.691
5
1
.490
54
  Sun Belt
.389
8
21
.525
21. South Carolina
.682
5
1
.479
61
  Mid-American
.358
14
32
.474
22. Washington
.678
3
3
.678
1
  *non-conference play
23. BYU
.677
5
1
.473
65
 
24. Utah
.675
4
1
.494
51
 
25. Stanford
.662
4
2
.566
15
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
South Florida
.661
5
0
.328
119
 
74.
Indiana
.469
3
3
.469
74
27.
West Virginia
.656
4
1
.473
66
 
75.
N.C. State
.467
3
3
.467
76
28.
Pittsburgh
.655
5
1
.448
90
 
76.
Mississippi State
.465
2
4
.566
14
29.
Houston
.653
4
1
.469
73
 
77.
Florida State
.462
2
4
.563
21
30.
Penn State
.649
5
1
.442
96
 
78.
Nevada
.461
2
3
.521
38
31.
Oklahoma State
.647
4
1
.463
81
 
79.
East Carolina
.461
3
3
.461
84
32.
Georgia
.645
3
3
.645
2
 
80.
UTEP
.447
2
4
.548
26
33.
Arkansas
.643
3
2
.586
7
 
81.
Louisville
.446
2
3
.506
45
34.
Arizona
.639
3
2
.582
8
 
82.
Kansas State
.446
3
3
.446
93
35.
Missouri
.628
4
1
.443
95
 
83.
Southern Miss
.444
3
3
.444
94
36.
UCLA
.628
3
2
.570
11
 
84.
Central Florida
.439
3
2
.381
116
37.
Michigan
.626
4
2
.528
35
 
85.
Toledo
.421
3
3
.421
107
38.
Minnesota
.623
4
2
.524
36
 
86.
Syracuse
.420
2
4
.521
37
39.
Oregon State
.618
4
2
.519
40
 
87.
Bowling Green
.420
2
4
.520
39
40.
Central Michigan
.600
5
1
.392
113
 
88.
Virginia
.418
2
3
.477
62
41.
California
.598
3
2
.539
28
 
89.
San Diego State
.415
2
3
.474
64
42.
Boston College
.597
4
2
.497
49
 
90.
Western Michigan
.409
3
3
.409
108
43.
Tennessee
.591
3
3
.591
6
 
91.
Arkansas State
.399
1
3
.552
23
44.
Oklahoma
.569
3
2
.509
43
 
92.
New Mexico State
.395
3
3
.395
109
45.
Marshall
.568
4
2
.467
75
 
93.
Maryland
.392
2
4
.492
53
46.
Wake Forest
.568
4
2
.467
78
 
94.
UAB
.391
2
3
.449
88
47.
Rutgers
.567
4
1
.382
114
 
95.
Louisiana Tech
.390
2
3
.449
89
48.
Troy
.564
3
2
.504
46
 
96.
Tulane
.383
2
3
.441
97
49.
Navy
.562
4
2
.461
83
 
97.
Temple
.379
3
2
.325
120
50.
Kentucky
.548
2
3
.607
3
 
98.
San Jose State
.379
1
4
.565
17
51.
LA Lafayette
.545
3
2
.485
55
 
99.
Army
.378
3
3
.378
117
52.
Mississippi
.545
3
2
.485
56
 
100.
Colorado
.363
1
4
.548
25
53.
Arizona State
.543
3
2
.483
57
 
101.
Illinois
.362
1
4
.547
27
54.
Northern Illinois
.542
3
2
.482
59
 
102.
Purdue
.359
1
5
.566
12
55.
North Carolina
.540
4
2
.439
99
 
103.
Washington State
.356
1
5
.563
20
56.
Tulsa
.539
4
1
.355
118
 
104.
UNLV
.356
2
4
.453
86
57.
Connecticut
.537
3
2
.476
63
 
105.
Vanderbilt
.353
2
4
.451
87
58.
Texas Tech
.533
4
2
.433
103
 
106.
Buffalo
.351
2
4
.448
91
59.
Michigan State
.531
3
3
.531
32
 
107.
Memphis
.344
2
4
.440
98
60.
Ohio
.524
4
2
.423
106
 
108.
Hawaii
.336
2
3
.392
112
61.
Baylor
.523
3
2
.463
82
 
109.
Kent State
.329
2
4
.423
105
62.
Texas A&M
.515
3
2
.455
85
 
110.
North Texas
.314
1
4
.493
52
63.
Colorado State
.510
3
3
.510
42
 
111.
Fla. International
.305
1
4
.482
58
64.
SMU
.508
3
2
.448
92
 
112.
Utah State
.296
1
4
.472
67
65.
Clemson
.506
2
3
.566
13
 
113.
Akron
.290
1
4
.465
79
66.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.497
3
2
.437
100
 
114.
Florida Atlantic
.244
0
4
.563
19
67.
Wyoming
.495
4
2
.395
110
 
115.
Miami, Ohio
.218
0
6
.528
34
68.
LA Monroe
.495
3
2
.435
102
 
116.
Rice
.197
0
6
.495
50
69.
Northwestern
.480
4
2
.381
115
 
117.
Eastern Michigan
.182
0
5
.472
68
70.
Iowa State
.480
3
3
.480
60
 
118.
New Mexico
.182
0
6
.471
69
71.
Fresno State
.473
2
3
.533
31
 
119.
Western Kentucky
.178
0
5
.464
80
72.
Duke
.471
3
3
.471
70
 
120.
Ball State
.140
0
6
.394
111
73.
Air Force
.471
3
3
.471
71
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2009 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved