Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Florida Reclaims the Top Spot

Why Chris Fowler Is Wrong

  • The Gators retake the top spot from Iowa
  • Texas rises to #4
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has by far the most meaningful regular season in all of sports, and next week will feature two more top-25 matchups: #9 LSU at #3 Alabama, and #21 Ohio St. at #12 Penn St.
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 1

Oct. 25 Rankings

Oct. 18 Rankings

Oct. 11 Rankings

Oct. 4 Rankings

Final 2008-09 Rankings

2008 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida
.837
8
0
.562
16
1-0
0-0
0
2.
Iowa
.830
9
0
.549
26
0-0
3-0
0
3.
Alabama
.817
8
0
.527
35
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Texas
.815
8
0
.523
38
0-0
1-0
0
5.
TCU
.808
8
0
.513
45
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Cincinnati
.801
8
0
.501
51
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Oregon
.790
7
1
.588
11
0-1
3-0
0
8.
Boise State
.775
8
0
.462
88
1-0
0-0
0
9.
LSU
.773
7
1
.563
18
0-1
1-0
0
10.
Georgia Tech
.755
8
1
.529
34
0-0
1-1
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. USC
.740
6
2
.605
5
  Pac-10
.635
20
9
.522
12. Penn State
.724
8
1
.489
65
  Southeastern
.618
30
6
.410
13. Utah
.710
7
1
.481
70
  Big East
.589
29
7
.399
14. Pittsburgh
.709
7
1
.480
72
  Big Ten
.578
29
10
.428
15. Houston
.700
7
1
.470
80
  Big 12
.550
34
13
.414
16. Wisconsin
.699
6
2
.555
22
  Atlantic Coast
.536
28
15
.444
17. Notre Dame
.696
6
2
.552
23
  Mountain West
.499
20
15
.456
18. Miami, Fla.
.694
6
2
.550
25
  WAC
.464
17
18
.472
19. Arizona
.691
5
2
.570
15
  Conference USA
.430
18
26
.484
20. Virginia Tech
.685
5
3
.617
3
  Sun Belt
.371
8
24
.523
21. Ohio State
.685
7
2
.520
43
  Mid-American
.370
16
35
.481
22. Oklahoma State
.671
6
2
.523
39
  *non-conference play
23. California
.670
6
2
.523
40
 
24. Auburn
.654
6
3
.558
20
 
25. BYU
.650
6
2
.500
54
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
West Virginia
.645
6
2
.494
59
 
74.
Louisville
.470
3
5
.545
28
27.
South Florida
.631
6
2
.479
73
 
75.
Wake Forest
.468
4
5
.501
52
28.
Georgia
.631
4
4
.631
2
 
76.
LA Monroe
.463
4
4
.463
84
29.
Oregon State
.629
5
3
.556
21
 
77.
Southern Miss
.462
5
4
.429
103
30.
Minnesota
.626
5
4
.595
9
 
78.
Ohio
.460
6
3
.362
120
31.
South Carolina
.623
6
3
.524
37
 
79.
Wyoming
.454
4
4
.454
93
32.
Boston College
.621
6
3
.522
41
 
80.
San Diego State
.440
4
4
.440
98
33.
Clemson
.613
5
3
.539
29
 
81.
Indiana
.439
4
5
.472
78
34.
Idaho
.609
7
2
.438
99
 
82.
Colorado State
.435
3
6
.536
30
35.
Stanford
.605
5
3
.531
33
 
83.
Baylor
.433
3
5
.509
47
36.
Tennessee
.604
4
4
.604
6
 
84.
Virginia
.430
3
5
.505
49
37.
Kentucky
.603
4
4
.603
7
 
85.
Kent State
.429
5
4
.397
115
38.
Oklahoma
.600
5
3
.526
36
 
86.
Central Florida
.425
4
3
.384
118
39.
Rutgers
.595
6
2
.441
96
 
87.
N.C. State
.415
3
5
.490
62
40.
Troy
.594
6
2
.441
97
 
88.
Bowling Green
.412
3
5
.486
67
41.
Washington
.593
3
5
.664
1
 
89.
UTEP
.404
3
5
.479
74
42.
Missouri
.583
5
3
.508
48
 
90.
Tulsa
.399
4
4
.399
114
43.
Central Michigan
.580
7
2
.408
111
 
91.
UNLV
.394
3
6
.494
58
44.
Mississippi
.579
5
3
.504
50
 
92.
LA Lafayette
.393
4
4
.393
116
45.
Texas Tech
.578
6
3
.477
75
 
93.
UAB
.393
3
5
.467
83
46.
Nebraska
.576
5
3
.501
53
 
94.
Colorado
.392
2
6
.545
27
47.
Arkansas
.576
4
4
.576
13
 
95.
Toledo
.391
4
5
.423
105
48.
Navy
.569
6
3
.469
82
 
96.
Illinois
.379
2
6
.531
32
49.
North Carolina
.569
5
3
.494
60
 
97.
Louisiana Tech
.375
3
5
.448
94
50.
Mississippi State
.565
4
5
.597
8
 
98.
Western Michigan
.373
4
5
.405
113
51.
Florida State
.561
4
4
.561
17
 
99.
Vanderbilt
.362
2
7
.531
31
52.
Texas A&M
.560
5
3
.485
69
 
100.
Buffalo
.362
3
5
.434
101
53.
Fresno State
.549
5
3
.474
76
 
101.
Arkansas State
.358
2
5
.485
68
54.
Nevada
.549
5
3
.473
77
 
102.
Washington State
.355
1
7
.592
10
55.
Kansas
.546
5
3
.471
79
 
103.
San Jose State
.351
1
6
.575
14
56.
UCLA
.538
3
5
.612
4
 
104.
Maryland
.347
2
6
.496
55
57.
Michigan
.528
5
4
.494
56
 
105.
Army
.345
3
5
.417
107
58.
Iowa State
.526
5
4
.493
61
 
106.
Tulane
.345
2
6
.494
57
59.
Michigan State
.525
4
5
.558
19
 
107.
Utah State
.340
2
6
.489
64
60.
Temple
.525
6
2
.373
119
 
108.
Florida Atlantic
.334
2
5
.459
90
61.
Air Force
.523
5
4
.490
63
 
109.
New Mexico State
.330
3
6
.425
104
62.
Arizona State
.521
4
4
.521
42
 
110.
Hawaii
.322
2
6
.469
81
63.
Marshall
.521
5
3
.446
95
 
111.
Fla. International
.317
2
6
.463
87
64.
Connecticut
.512
4
4
.512
46
 
112.
Memphis
.293
2
6
.434
100
65.
Kansas State
.495
5
4
.462
89
 
113.
North Texas
.281
2
6
.420
106
66.
Duke
.490
5
3
.415
108
 
114.
Miami, Ohio
.277
1
8
.514
44
67.
Northwestern
.490
5
4
.456
91
 
115.
Akron
.246
1
7
.463
86
68.
Northern Illinois
.487
5
3
.412
109
 
116.
Rice
.191
0
8
.486
66
69.
East Carolina
.484
5
3
.410
110
 
117.
Ball State
.187
1
8
.388
117
70.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.481
5
3
.407
112
 
118.
New Mexico
.177
0
8
.463
85
71.
SMU
.481
4
4
.481
71
 
119.
Eastern Michigan
.173
0
8
.456
92
72.
Purdue
.481
3
6
.581
12
 
120.
Western Kentucky
.160
0
8
.433
102
73.
Syracuse
.475
3
5
.550
24
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2009 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved