Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Top 3 Separate Themselves from the Pack

  • Michigan moves from #3 to #2 after beating then-#6 (now-#7) Ohio State
  • Georgia, Michigan, and Cincinnati are the 3 teams that have accomplished by far the most so far this season—and there’s now a bigger gap between #3 and #4 (.027) than between #4 and #8 (.025)
  • Air Force and Army both crack the top-40
  • This coming week features 5 top-25 matchups (the championship games of the SEC, Big Ten, American, Big 12, and ACC), 2 of which (SEC and Big Ten) are top-10 matchups
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 28

Nov. 22 Rankings
Nov. 15 Rankings
Nov. 8 Rankings
Nov. 1 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings

Final 2020-21 Rankings
Final ’20 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.816
12
0
.526
48
0-0
3-0
0
2.
Michigan
.804
11
1
.578
12
1-1
1-0
0
3.
Cincinnati
.804
12
0
.505
56
1-0
0-0
0
4.
Alabama
.777
11
1
.538
42
1-0
1-0
1
5.
Oklahoma St.
.772
11
1
.530
44
0-0
2-0
1
6.
Notre Dame
.769
11
1
.526
49
0-1
2-0
0
7.
Ohio State
.761
10
2
.578
13
1-1
1-1
0
8.
Michigan St.
.752
10
2
.564
20
1-1
0-1
0
9.
Mississippi
.743
10
2
.554
28
0-1
1-0
1
10.
Iowa
.743
10
2
.553
30
0-0
0-2
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Baylor
.741
10
2
.551
32
  Big Ten
.618
33
9
.442
12.
Oklahoma
.731
10
2
.538
41
  Southeastern
.612
48
8
.387
13.
Wisconsin
.704
8
4
.613
3
  Big 12
.595
24
6
.409
14.
San Diego State
.703
11
1
.441
101
  Atlantic Coast
.532
34
20
.454
15.
Wake Forest
.694
10
2
.492
59
  American Athletic
.488
24
19
.453
16.
Purdue
.686
8
4
.593
9
  Mountain West
.482
30
19
.415
17.
BYU
.683
10
2
.480
69
  Pac-12
.466
16
20
.499
18.
Arkansas
.680
8
4
.586
11
  Sun Belt
.428
21
19
.414
19.
Louisiana 
.677
11
1
.411
116
  Mid-American
.422
21
27
.459
20.
Kentucky
.675
9
3
.527
47
  Conference USA
.398
24
32
.440
21.
Oregon
.674
10
2
.469
75
  *non-conference play
22.
Pittsburgh
.672
10
2
.468
77
 
23.
Clemson
.671
9
3
.523
50
 
24.
Houston
.669
11
1
.402
122
 
25.
UTSA
.663
11
1
.396
123
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Texas A&M
.658
8
4
.562
23
 
79.
Memphis
.465
6
6
.465
79
27.
Appalachian St.
.656
10
2
.450
95
 
80.
Nebraska
.462
3
9
.614
2
28.
Minnesota
.652
8
4
.555
27
 
81.
Marshall
.458
7
5
.409
118
29.
Penn State
.649
7
5
.602
6
 
82.
Eastern Michigan
.457
7
5
.408
119
30.
N.C. State
.648
9
3
.498
57
 
83.
Toledo
.443
7
5
.394
125
31.
Utah
.640
9
3
.489
63
 
84.
UTEP
.443
7
5
.394
126
32.
Mississippi State
.617
7
5
.568
16
 
85.
Wyoming
.443
6
6
.443
99
33.
Iowa State
.616
7
5
.567
17
 
86.
Ball State
.438
6
6
.438
102
34.
Tennessee
.612
7
5
.563
21
 
87.
Indiana
.434
2
10
.642
1
35.
Fresno State
.611
9
3
.458
86
 
88.
USC
.433
4
7
.515
54
36.
Air Force
.610
9
3
.457
87
 
89.
Miami, Ohio
.432
6
6
.432
106
37.
Kansas State
.606
7
5
.557
25
 
90.
Hawaii
.427
6
7
.450
94
38.
Auburn
.604
6
6
.604
5
 
91.
North Texas
.415
6
6
.415
115
39.
Army
.603
8
3
.464
80
 
92.
Navy
.412
3
8
.551
31
40.
Maryland
.601
6
6
.601
7
 
93.
Troy
.410
5
7
.460
83
41.
Boise State
.595
7
5
.546
34
 
94.
Northwestern
.409
3
9
.563
22
42.
LSU
.595
6
6
.595
8
 
95.
San Jose State
.402
5
7
.451
92
43.
Miami, Fla.
.591
7
5
.542
36
 
96.
Georgia Tech
.400
3
9
.554
29
44.
Utah State
.586
9
3
.432
105
 
97.
Colorado
.391
4
8
.490
60
45.
Coastal Carolina
.581
10
2
.373
130
 
98.
LA Monroe
.391
4
8
.490
61
46.
UCLA
.577
8
4
.477
71
 
99.
Old Dominion
.386
6
6
.386
127
47.
West Virginia
.573
6
6
.573
15
 
100.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.382
6
6
.382
128
48.
South Carolina
.567
6
6
.567
18
 
101.
South Alabama
.380
5
7
.428
107
49.
Nevada
.560
8
4
.459
85
 
102.
Stanford
.377
3
9
.529
46
50.
Texas
.559
5
7
.608
4
 
103.
California
.374
4
7
.454
90
51.
Missouri
.555
6
6
.555
26
 
104.
Kansas
.365
2
10
.573
14
52.
SMU
.553
8
4
.452
91
 
105.
Rice
.364
4
8
.462
82
53.
Texas Tech
.551
6
6
.551
33
 
106.
Washington
.362
4
8
.459
84
54.
UCF
.545
8
4
.444
97
 
107.
Florida Atlantic
.360
5
7
.407
120
55.
Florida
.544
6
6
.544
35
 
108.
Texas State
.337
4
8
.433
104
56.
Arizona State
.543
8
4
.442
100
 
109.
Duke
.337
3
9
.485
64
57.
Louisville
.541
6
6
.541
37
 
110.
Charlotte
.336
5
7
.382
129
58.
Illinois
.539
5
7
.588
10
 
111.
Vanderbilt
.335
2
10
.541
38
59.
Virginia
.538
6
6
.538
40
 
112.
Tulane
.334
2
10
.540
39
60.
Northern Illinois
.538
8
4
.437
103
 
113.
New Mexico
.334
3
9
.483
65
61.
Georgia State
.531
7
5
.481
67
 
114.
Georgia Southern
.334
3
9
.482
66
62.
North Carolina
.529
6
6
.529
45
 
115.
Colorado State
.327
3
9
.475
73
63.
UAB
.528
8
4
.427
109
 
116.
Bowling Green
.322
4
8
.416
114
64.
East Carolina
.527
7
5
.476
72
 
117.
Temple
.320
3
9
.466
78
65.
Western Kentucky
.527
8
4
.426
110
 
118.
South Florida
.315
2
10
.518
51
66.
Central Michigan
.525
8
4
.424
111
 
119.
UNLV
.315
2
10
.518
52
67.
Oregon State
.521
7
5
.471
74
 
120.
Buffalo
.311
4
8
.404
121
68.
Washington State
.519
7
5
.469
76
 
121.
Louisiana Tech
.303
3
9
.447
96
69.
Rutgers
.516
5
7
.566
19
 
122.
New Mexico State
.283
2
10
.480
68
70.
TCU
.512
5
7
.561
24
 
123.
Southern Miss
.280
3
9
.419
113
71.
Liberty
.505
7
5
.455
88
 
124.
Ohio
.272
3
9
.410
117
72.
Western Michigan
.501
7
5
.451
93
 
125.
Arkansas State
.263
2
10
.454
89
73.
Virginia Tech
.496
6
6
.496
58
 
126.
Arizona
.254
1
11
.506
55
74.
Kent State
.493
7
5
.443
98
 
127.
Akron
.240
2
10
.424
112
75.
Tulsa
.490
6
6
.490
62
 
128.
Connecticut
.223
1
11
.462
81
76.
Florida State
.482
5
7
.532
43
 
129.
Massachusetts
.199
1
11
.428
108
77.
Boston College
.479
6
6
.479
70
 
130.
Fla. International
.179
1
11
.395
124
78.
Syracuse
.466
5
7
.516
53
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s eighth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2021 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved