Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Two ACC Teams in the Top-4, Two Group-of-Five Teams in the Top-6

  • Ohio State, Alabama, Clemson, and Notre Dame claim the top 4 spots
  • The (11-0) Coastal Carolina Chanticleers, winners at #12 Louisiana and versus #15 BYU, earn a top-5 ranking based on their regular-season accomplisments
  • The (9-0) Cincinnati Bearcats, with their win over #21 Tulsa, finish the regular season at #6
  • There is a big gap between #6 and #7 (.026), and another between #10 and #11 (.027)
  • The ACC, American, and Big 12 are the top 3 conferences among those that have played more than a handful of non-conference games
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 20

Dec. 13 Rankings
Dec. 6 Rankings
Nov. 30 Rankings
Nov. 23 Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Ohio State
.854
6
0
.593
33
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Alabama
.846
11
0
.579
43
1-0
2-0
0
3.
Clemson
.824
10
1
.615
19
2-1
0-0
0
4.
Notre Dame
.820
10
1
.609
24
1-1
1-0
0
5.
Coastal Car.
.815
11
0
.524
63
0-0
2-0
0
6.
Cincinnati
.813
9
0
.521
67
0-0
1-0
0
7.
Texas A&M
.787
8
1
.574
45
0-1
2-0
0
8.
Miami, Fla.
.787
8
2
.635
8
0-1
1-1
0
9.
San Jose St.
.783
7
0
.474
93
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Indiana
.780
6
1
.587
39
0-1
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Georgia
.753
7
2
.604
27
  Atlantic Coast
.569
12
3
.383
12.
Louisiana 
.750
9
1
.513
70
  American Athletic
.554
12
7
.475
13.
N.C. State
.742
8
3
.622
14
  Big 12
.549
6
3
.448
14.
Northwestern
.740
6
2
.605
26
  Sun Belt
.482
16
14
.462
15.
BYU
.738
10
1
.491
85
  Conference USA
.411
16
21
.451
16.
North Carolina
.733
8
3
.611
23
  Pac-12
N/A
1
0
N/A
17.
Florida
.716
8
3
.591
37
  Southeastern
N/A
0
0
N/A
18.
Colorado
.716
4
1
.543
59
  Big Ten
N/A
0
0
N/A
19.
USC
.716
5
1
.519
68
  Mountain West
N/A
1
4
N/A
20.
Iowa
.707
6
2
.564
50
  Mid-American
N/A
0
0
N/A
21.
Tulsa
.705
6
2
.563
51
  *non-conference play
22.
Washington
.675
3
1
.528
62
 
23.
Auburn
.671
6
4
.615
18
 
24.
Ball State
.664
6
1
.441
103
 
25.
Oklahoma
.661
8
2
.478
91
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Stanford
.657
4
2
.561
53
 
79.
West Virginia
.491
5
4
.458
100
27.
Pittsburgh
.656
6
5
.631
10
 
80.
Toledo
.483
4
2
.384
121
28.
Virginia Tech
.650
5
6
.675
1
 
81.
Purdue
.473
2
4
.574
44
29.
Boston College
.648
6
5
.623
12
 
82.
Hawaii
.473
4
4
.473
94
30.
Utah
.648
3
2
.591
36
 
83.
Florida Atlantic
.467
5
3
.393
119
31.
UCF
.642
6
3
.545
58
 
84.
Washington State
.460
1
3
.613
20
32.
Oregon
.639
4
2
.542
60
 
85.
East Carolina
.454
3
6
.555
55
33.
Virginia
.638
5
5
.638
7
 
86.
Troy
.451
5
6
.478
92
34.
Oklahoma State
.632
7
3
.512
71
 
87.
Duke
.448
2
9
.645
5
35.
Liberty
.628
9
1
.372
123
 
88.
Navy
.443
3
7
.565
49
36.
Boise State
.624
5
2
.495
83
 
89.
Kansas State
.442
4
6
.502
79
37.
Wake Forest
.617
4
4
.617
17
 
90.
Oregon State
.440
2
5
.570
48
38.
Army
.614
9
2
.415
114
 
91.
Illinois
.434
2
6
.588
38
39.
Wisconsin
.613
3
3
.613
21
 
92.
Texas Tech
.423
4
6
.483
89
40.
Memphis
.610
7
3
.490
87
 
93.
South Alabama
.421
4
7
.503
78
41.
Appalachian St.
.609
8
3
.471
96
 
94.
California
.419
1
3
.573
46
42.
Buffalo
.605
5
1
.397
117
 
95.
Western Kentucky
.418
5
6
.445
102
43.
SMU
.605
7
3
.484
88
 
96.
South Carolina
.417
2
8
.603
29
44.
UAB
.605
6
3
.505
76
 
97.
Central Michigan
.413
3
3
.413
115
45.
Iowa State
.605
8
3
.466
97
 
98.
Arkansas State
.408
4
7
.490
86
46.
LSU
.599
5
5
.599
30
 
99.
Syracuse
.406
1
10
.667
2
47.
Texas
.598
6
3
.498
81
 
100.
Fresno State
.382
3
3
.382
122
48.
Marshall
.588
7
2
.417
113
 
101.
Rice
.379
2
3
.437
106
49.
Missouri
.582
5
5
.582
41
 
102.
North Texas
.359
4
5
.390
120
50.
Penn State
.575
4
5
.608
25
 
103.
Baylor
.353
2
7
.522
66
51.
Nevada
.575
6
2
.421
112
 
104.
New Mexico
.353
2
5
.480
90
52.
Maryland
.561
2
3
.619
16
 
105.
Eastern Michigan
.350
2
4
.447
101
53.
TCU
.560
6
4
.500
80
 
106.
Texas State
.347
2
10
.554
56
54.
Louisville
.552
4
7
.631
9
 
107.
Wyoming
.340
2
4
.435
107
55.
Houston
.550
3
4
.592
34
 
108.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.337
3
6
.433
108
56.
Mississippi
.548
4
5
.581
42
 
109.
Charlotte
.335
2
4
.431
110
57.
Tulane
.545
6
5
.518
69
 
110.
South Florida
.326
1
8
.571
47
58.
Georgia State
.545
5
4
.512
73
 
111.
Southern Miss
.324
3
7
.439
105
59.
Arkansas
.543
3
7
.660
4
 
112.
Colorado State
.315
1
3
.461
98
60.
Michigan State
.537
2
5
.662
3
 
113.
Temple
.305
1
6
.523
64
61.
Kentucky
.532
4
6
.591
35
 
114.
UTEP
.304
3
5
.371
124
62.
Nebraska
.529
3
5
.603
28
 
115.
Utah State
.297
1
5
.497
82
63.
Georgia Tech
.527
3
7
.645
6
 
116.
Arizona
.283
0
5
.613
22
64.
Florida State
.524
3
6
.623
11
 
117.
Vanderbilt
.261
0
9
.586
40
65.
Air Force
.522
3
3
.522
65
 
118.
Akron
.252
1
5
.441
104
66.
Georgia Southern
.521
7
5
.471
95
 
119.
Kansas
.236
0
9
.553
57
67.
UCLA
.519
3
4
.562
52
 
120.
Massachusetts
.224
0
4
.537
61
68.
Minnesota
.516
3
4
.559
54
 
121.
LA Monroe
.207
0
10
.511
74
69.
UTSA
.514
7
4
.432
109
 
122.
UNLV
.206
0
6
.509
75
70.
San Diego State
.512
4
4
.512
72
 
123.
Northern Illinois
.195
0
6
.492
84
71.
Arizona State
.503
2
2
.503
77
 
124.
Bowling Green
.156
0
5
.425
111
72.
Tennessee
.503
3
7
.623
13
 
125.
Fla. International
.146
0
5
.406
116
73.
Mississippi State
.502
3
7
.622
15
 
126.
74.
Kent State
.502
3
1
.351
125
 
127.
75.
Western Michigan
.496
4
2
.396
118
 
128.
76.
Rutgers
.494
3
6
.594
31
 
129.
77.
Michigan
.493
2
4
.593
32
 
130.
78.
Louisiana Tech
.491
5
4
.458
99
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s sixth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2020 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved