Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Georgia Premieres at #1

  • The Bulldogs have posted a perfect (7-0) record versus the nation’s 14th-toughest schedule to date
  • The SEC, Big Ten, American, ACC, and Big 12 each place a team in the initial top-5
  • The Big Ten has been the top conference to date, based on success in non-conference play
  • Based on accomplishments to date, the A.P. poll is far underrating Michigan (7-0, including a win at #23 Wisconsin) and Wake Forest (7-0, including a win at #22 Virginia), and far overrating Alabama (1-1 versus teams currently ranked between #11 and #25) and Ohio State (0-1 vs. the current top-25, with the loss being at home to #20 Oregon (losers to #72 Stanford))
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 26

Final 2020-21 Rankings
Final ’20 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.838
7
0
.564
14
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Michigan
.820
7
0
.533
38
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Cincinnati
.817
7
0
.527
44
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Wake Forest
.806
7
0
.510
53
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Oklahoma
.806
8
0
.509
54
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Michigan St.
.783
7
0
.474
77
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Kentucky
.765
6
1
.565
13
0-1
0-0
0
8.
Oklahoma St.
.763
6
1
.563
16
0-0
1-0
1
9.
Alabama
.763
7
1
.549
29
0-0
1-1
0
10.
Iowa
.759
6
1
.558
20
0-0
1-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Notre Dame
.758
6
1
.556
22
  Big Ten
.635
33
9
.459
12.
Mississippi
.750
6
1
.546
32
  Southeastern
.617
36
7
.405
13.
Ohio State
.743
6
1
.536
35
  Big 12
.604
24
6
.418
14.
UTSA
.728
8
0
.401
122
  Atlantic Coast
.555
31
13
.430
15.
San Diego State
.724
7
0
.395
125
  Mountain West
.491
29
18
.421
16.
Baylor
.716
6
1
.502
60
  American Athletic
.489
22
18
.459
17.
SMU
.708
7
0
.377
129
  Pac-12
.465
16
18
.483
18.
Texas A&M
.692
6
2
.547
30
  Sun Belt
.438
20
16
.406
19.
Pittsburgh
.686
6
1
.466
83
  Mid-American
.431
21
27
.468
20.
Oregon
.678
6
1
.457
93
  Conference USA
.402
24
32
.444
21.
Penn State
.677
5
2
.554
25
  *non-conference play
22.
Virginia
.676
6
2
.529
42
 
23.
Wisconsin
.674
4
3
.635
1
 
24.
Auburn
.665
5
2
.539
33
 
25.
BYU
.663
6
2
.514
51
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Texas
.660
4
3
.620
2
 
79.
Florida State
.486
3
4
.529
41
27.
Arkansas
.659
5
3
.589
8
 
80.
USC
.480
3
4
.523
45
28.
Iowa State
.657
5
2
.530
40
 
81.
Ball State
.479
4
4
.479
73
29.
Minnesota
.655
5
2
.528
43
 
82.
Virginia Tech
.478
3
4
.521
48
30.
Purdue
.643
4
3
.602
5
 
83.
Rice
.475
3
4
.518
50
31.
Houston
.641
6
1
.416
116
 
84.
Kent State
.473
4
4
.473
78
32.
Air Force
.638
6
2
.486
69
 
85.
Miami, Ohio
.470
4
4
.470
80
33.
Louisiana 
.621
6
1
.396
124
 
86.
Toledo
.469
4
4
.469
81
34.
Coastal Carolina
.619
6
1
.394
126
 
87.
Northwestern
.466
3
4
.509
55
35.
N.C. State
.613
5
2
.484
72
 
88.
Florida Atlantic
.464
4
3
.421
111
36.
Florida
.613
4
3
.572
11
 
89.
Troy
.457
4
3
.415
117
37.
Northern Illinois
.610
6
2
.458
92
 
90.
Missouri
.451
3
4
.494
64
38.
Kansas State
.609
4
3
.568
12
 
91.
Charlotte
.446
4
3
.404
120
39.
Appalachian St.
.606
5
2
.476
76
 
92.
Tulsa
.445
3
4
.488
66
40.
Maryland
.606
4
3
.564
15
 
93.
Memphis
.444
4
4
.444
100
41.
Mississippi State
.598
4
3
.556
23
 
94.
Hawaii
.439
4
4
.439
105
42.
Louisville
.596
4
3
.554
24
 
95.
South Alabama
.431
4
3
.389
127
43.
Oregon State
.592
5
2
.461
86
 
96.
East Carolina
.424
3
4
.467
82
44.
UTEP
.590
6
1
.366
130
 
97.
Marshall
.422
4
3
.381
128
45.
Utah State
.589
5
2
.458
91
 
98.
San Jose State
.421
4
4
.421
112
46.
Clemson
.589
4
3
.547
31
 
99.
New Mexico
.419
3
5
.494
63
47.
Fresno State
.581
6
2
.427
109
 
100.
Duke
.419
3
4
.462
85
48.
LSU
.579
4
4
.579
9
 
101.
Western Kentucky
.418
3
4
.461
87
49.
Nevada
.576
5
2
.445
99
 
102.
Colorado State
.417
3
4
.459
90
50.
Arizona State
.575
5
2
.444
101
 
103.
Temple
.410
3
4
.452
94
51.
UCLA
.573
5
3
.498
62
 
104.
Central Michigan
.409
4
4
.409
118
52.
North Carolina
.565
4
3
.523
46
 
105.
Buffalo
.401
4
4
.401
123
53.
Utah
.563
4
3
.521
49
 
106.
Washington
.391
3
4
.433
106
54.
Western Michigan
.561
5
3
.486
70
 
107.
South Florida
.382
2
5
.512
52
55.
Liberty
.559
6
2
.406
119
 
108.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.379
3
4
.420
113
56.
Texas Tech
.554
5
3
.478
74
 
109.
Louisiana Tech
.375
2
5
.504
59
57.
South Carolina
.551
4
4
.551
26
 
110.
Vanderbilt
.356
2
6
.507
58
58.
Tennessee
.550
4
4
.550
27
 
111.
Navy
.338
1
6
.561
18
59.
Miami, Fla.
.550
3
4
.592
6
 
112.
Kansas
.337
1
6
.560
19
60.
Army
.550
4
3
.507
57
 
113.
Tulane
.334
1
6
.556
21
61.
Boise State
.549
3
4
.591
7
 
114.
California
.328
2
5
.452
96
62.
LA Monroe
.544
4
3
.501
61
 
115.
Colorado
.324
2
5
.448
98
63.
Illinois
.543
3
5
.617
4
 
116.
Georgia Southern
.320
2
5
.443
102
64.
UCF
.535
4
3
.493
65
 
117.
Bowling Green
.317
2
6
.463
84
65.
Rutgers
.520
3
4
.563
17
 
118.
Texas State
.307
2
5
.428
108
66.
UAB
.517
5
3
.441
103
 
119.
Akron
.290
2
6
.432
107
67.
West Virginia
.506
3
4
.549
28
 
120.
Massachusetts
.274
1
6
.485
71
68.
Nebraska
.505
3
5
.579
10
 
121.
Southern Miss
.267
1
6
.477
75
69.
Boston College
.502
4
3
.459
89
 
122.
Old Dominion
.255
1
6
.461
88
70.
Eastern Michigan
.502
5
3
.427
110
 
123.
New Mexico State
.252
1
7
.471
79
71.
Wyoming
.495
4
3
.452
95
 
124.
North Texas
.248
1
6
.451
97
72.
Stanford
.495
3
4
.538
34
 
125.
Arkansas State
.239
1
6
.440
104
73.
Georgia Tech
.493
3
4
.536
36
 
126.
UNLV
.215
0
7
.522
47
74.
TCU
.491
3
4
.534
37
 
127.
Ohio
.215
1
7
.419
114
75.
Georgia State
.488
3
4
.531
39
 
128.
Fla. International
.212
1
6
.402
121
76.
Indiana
.488
2
5
.617
3
 
129.
Connecticut
.207
1
8
.417
115
77.
Washington State
.488
4
4
.488
67
 
130.
Arizona
.205
0
7
.508
56
78.
Syracuse
.487
4
4
.487
68
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s eighth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2021 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved