Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Georgia Is #1 for the 4th-Straight Week

  • #2 Cincinnati continues to be the only top-10 team with a win on the road against another top-10 team, with its victory at #4 Notre Dame
  • With 3 games on the road versus the current top-30, #3 Michigan has clearly played the toughest schedule, and accomplished the most, of any 1-loss team to date
  • None of the top 10 teams reside east of Ohio or west of Oklahoma, and more than half of the top-10 is from Ohio, Oklahoma, or Michigan
  • The Big Ten places a nation-leading 5 teams in the top-15, but the SEC matches the Big Ten’s tally with 6 teams in the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 15

Nov. 8 Rankings
Nov. 1 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings

Final 2020-21 Rankings
Final ’20 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.820
10
0
.533
44
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Cincinnati
.805
10
0
.508
55
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Michigan
.798
9
1
.580
16
0-1
1-0
0
4.
Notre Dame
.775
9
1
.548
31
0-1
2-0
0
5.
Alabama
.768
9
1
.538
40
1-0
0-1
0
6.
Michigan St.
.768
9
1
.537
41
1-0
0-1
0
7.
Ohio State
.765
9
1
.534
43
0-0
1-1
0
8.
Oklahoma St.
.764
9
1
.532
45
0-0
2-0
1
9.
Oklahoma
.758
9
1
.524
47
0-0
1-1
0
10.
Mississippi
.732
8
2
.562
24
0-1
2-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Wake Forest
.732
9
1
.489
66
  Big Ten
.626
33
9
.450
12.
Iowa
.731
8
2
.562
25
  Southeastern
.609
39
7
.390
13.
Wisconsin
.730
7
3
.624
2
  Big 12
.598
24
6
.411
14.
UTSA
.718
10
0
.389
130
  Atlantic Coast
.546
32
16
.445
15.
Baylor
.717
8
2
.544
37
  American Athletic
.495
22
19
.473
16.
Texas A&M
.700
7
3
.589
13
  Mountain West
.477
30
19
.411
17.
Oregon
.699
9
1
.449
93
  Pac-12
.470
16
18
.487
18.
BYU
.687
8
2
.508
56
  Sun Belt
.431
20
16
.398
19.
Arkansas
.686
7
3
.573
19
  Mid-American
.422
21
27
.459
20.
San Diego State
.677
9
1
.424
115
  Conference USA
.404
24
32
.446
21.
Purdue
.674
6
4
.619
3
  *non-conference play
22.
Houston
.673
9
1
.420
116
 
23.
Louisiana 
.668
9
1
.414
119
 
24.
Kentucky
.663
7
3
.546
34
 
25.
Kansas State
.660
7
3
.543
38
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Penn State
.654
6
4
.598
6
 
79.
Nebraska
.471
3
7
.592
9
27.
Appalachian St.
.651
8
2
.467
79
 
80.
Marshall
.467
6
4
.408
121
28.
Pittsburgh
.649
8
2
.465
81
 
81.
USC
.460
4
5
.493
62
29.
Auburn
.648
6
4
.591
11
 
82.
Eastern Michigan
.459
6
4
.400
123
30.
Mississippi State
.647
6
4
.590
12
 
83.
UTEP
.450
6
4
.392
129
31.
N.C. State
.637
7
3
.518
51
 
84.
Ball State
.448
5
5
.448
94
32.
Clemson
.628
7
3
.509
54
 
85.
Indiana
.446
2
8
.631
1
33.
Utah State
.623
8
2
.438
100
 
86.
Tulsa
.442
4
6
.502
58
34.
Iowa State
.615
6
4
.556
29
 
87.
Northwestern
.440
3
7
.561
26
35.
SMU
.614
8
2
.428
109
 
88.
Wyoming
.437
5
5
.437
101
36.
Boise State
.612
6
4
.554
30
 
89.
Troy
.435
5
5
.435
104
37.
Minnesota
.606
6
4
.547
32
 
90.
Miami, Ohio
.434
5
5
.434
105
38.
Virginia
.605
6
4
.546
35
 
91.
Toledo
.430
5
5
.430
108
39.
Utah
.603
7
3
.482
70
 
92.
LA Monroe
.411
4
6
.471
77
40.
Fresno State
.598
8
3
.460
86
 
93.
San Jose State
.410
5
6
.436
102
41.
Tennessee
.595
5
5
.595
8
 
94.
Stanford
.408
3
7
.529
46
42.
Air Force
.590
7
3
.469
78
 
95.
Navy
.404
2
7
.576
17
43.
Army
.590
6
3
.490
65
 
96.
Washington
.403
4
6
.463
83
44.
Maryland
.582
5
5
.582
14
 
97.
Florida Atlantic
.402
5
5
.402
122
45.
Coastal Carolina
.580
8
2
.394
127
 
98.
Georgia Tech
.401
3
7
.522
48
46.
Texas Tech
.578
6
4
.518
50
 
99.
South Alabama
.398
5
5
.398
124
47.
Arizona State
.578
7
3
.456
89
 
100.
Kansas
.395
2
8
.582
15
48.
Nevada
.576
7
3
.454
90
 
101.
Charlotte
.395
5
5
.395
125
49.
Miami, Fla.
.570
5
5
.570
20
 
102.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.393
5
5
.393
128
50.
Rutgers
.569
5
5
.569
21
 
103.
Hawaii
.373
4
7
.453
92
51.
North Carolina
.565
5
5
.565
22
 
104.
Duke
.371
3
7
.491
63
52.
Louisville
.560
5
5
.560
27
 
105.
Colorado
.369
3
7
.489
67
53.
Northern Illinois
.560
7
3
.438
99
 
106.
North Texas
.369
4
6
.426
111
54.
South Carolina
.558
5
5
.558
28
 
107.
Temple
.364
3
7
.483
69
55.
Texas
.551
4
6
.610
4
 
108.
Louisiana Tech
.362
3
7
.481
71
56.
UCLA
.550
6
4
.490
64
 
109.
Rice
.361
3
7
.480
72
57.
Liberty
.548
7
3
.426
112
 
110.
Old Dominion
.360
4
6
.417
118
58.
Florida
.546
5
5
.546
33
 
111.
California
.356
3
6
.453
91
59.
UCF
.544
6
4
.484
68
 
112.
Colorado State
.354
3
7
.473
74
60.
Illinois
.544
4
6
.603
5
 
113.
South Florida
.350
2
8
.534
42
61.
Missouri
.543
5
5
.543
39
 
114.
New Mexico
.343
3
7
.460
85
62.
UAB
.540
7
3
.418
117
 
115.
Georgia Southern
.341
3
7
.458
88
63.
LSU
.539
4
6
.598
7
 
116.
Buffalo
.339
4
6
.395
126
64.
West Virginia
.532
4
6
.592
10
 
117.
Vanderbilt
.334
2
8
.516
52
65.
Boston College
.526
6
4
.466
80
 
118.
Texas State
.327
3
7
.442
97
66.
East Carolina
.524
6
4
.464
82
 
119.
UNLV
.321
2
8
.501
59
67.
Georgia State
.520
5
5
.520
49
 
120.
Bowling Green
.316
3
7
.430
107
68.
TCU
.514
4
6
.574
18
 
121.
Ohio
.312
3
7
.425
113
69.
Syracuse
.510
5
5
.510
53
 
122.
Tulane
.311
1
9
.562
23
70.
Washington State
.506
5
5
.506
57
 
123.
Arkansas State
.287
2
8
.461
84
71.
Oregon State
.503
6
4
.443
95
 
124.
Akron
.267
2
8
.436
103
72.
Western Michigan
.502
6
4
.442
96
 
125.
Arizona
.260
1
9
.501
61
73.
Western Kentucky
.501
6
4
.441
98
 
126.
New Mexico State
.244
1
9
.478
73
74.
Virginia Tech
.501
5
5
.501
60
 
127.
Southern Miss
.230
1
9
.460
87
75.
Florida State
.485
4
6
.545
36
 
128.
Connecticut
.211
1
9
.433
106
76.
Central Michigan
.484
6
4
.424
114
 
129.
Massachusetts
.207
1
9
.427
110
77.
Memphis
.472
5
5
.472
75
 
130.
Fla. International
.195
1
9
.409
120
78.
Kent State
.472
5
5
.472
76
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s eighth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2021 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved