Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Bulldogs Are #1, the Spartans Vault to #2

  • Entering November, only 6 undefeated teams remain
  • Georgia is the only team with 2 wins vs. the current top-25 and a perfect record overall
  • Undefeated Michigan St. and Cincinnati each have a win over the current top-10
  • #8 Alabama, #9 Ohio St., and #10 Baylor are each 7-1 with 1-1 records versus teams currently ranked between #11 and 25
  • #15 Wisconsin has played the nation’s toughest schedule to date, while #5 Michigan has played the toughest schedule of any top-10 team
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 1

Oct. 26 Rankings

Final 2020-21 Rankings
Final ’20 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.831
8
0
.552
27
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Michigan St.
.818
8
0
.528
44
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Cincinnati
.814
8
0
.522
47
1-0
0-0
0
4.
Oklahoma
.799
9
0
.499
61
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Michigan
.790
7
1
.588
7
0-1
1-0
0
6.
Wake Forest
.786
8
0
.478
75
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Notre Dame
.770
7
1
.559
21
0-1
2-0
0
8.
Alabama
.760
7
1
.546
32
0-0
1-1
0
9.
Ohio State
.756
7
1
.540
36
0-0
1-1
0
10.
Baylor
.750
7
1
.533
38
0-0
1-1
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Oklahoma State
.749
7
1
.531
41
  Big Ten
.635
33
9
.460
12.
UTSA
.717
8
0
.388
127
  Southeastern
.609
36
7
.397
13.
Iowa
.717
6
2
.577
12
  Big 12
.602
24
6
.416
14.
Kentucky
.715
6
2
.574
16
  Atlantic Coast
.550
31
15
.444
15.
Wisconsin
.707
5
3
.641
1
  American Athletic
.490
22
18
.461
16.
Mississippi
.700
6
2
.557
23
  Mountain West
.486
29
18
.416
17.
Auburn
.698
6
2
.554
25
  Pac-12
.470
16
18
.488
18.
Texas A&M
.696
6
2
.552
28
  Sun Belt
.438
20
16
.406
19.
BYU
.692
7
2
.529
43
  Mid-American
.430
21
27
.467
20.
Oregon
.683
7
1
.449
100
  Conference USA
.403
24
32
.445
21.
Minnesota
.679
6
2
.533
39
  *non-conference play
22.
Houston
.668
7
1
.433
109
 
23.
San Diego State
.659
7
1
.423
113
 
24.
Purdue
.657
5
3
.586
8
 
25.
Appalachian St.
.653
6
2
.504
56
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Penn State
.647
5
3
.576
13
 
79.
Missouri
.474
4
4
.474
78
27.
Arkansas
.646
5
3
.575
15
 
80.
Ball State
.473
4
4
.473
80
28.
Mississippi State
.644
5
3
.572
18
 
81.
Boston College
.470
4
4
.470
84
29.
SMU
.642
7
1
.405
122
 
82.
Kent State
.469
4
4
.469
85
30.
N.C. State
.641
6
2
.490
64
 
83.
Indiana
.468
2
6
.620
3
31.
Air Force
.638
6
2
.487
68
 
84.
Florida State
.465
3
5
.541
35
32.
Pittsburgh
.633
6
2
.481
73
 
85.
Toledo
.462
4
4
.462
88
33.
Coastal Carolina
.633
7
1
.395
125
 
86.
Marshall
.459
5
3
.386
128
34.
Maryland
.631
5
3
.558
22
 
87.
Western Kentucky
.459
4
4
.459
89
35.
Virginia
.630
6
3
.531
40
 
88.
Northwestern
.452
3
5
.527
45
36.
Louisiana 
.626
7
1
.388
126
 
89.
Memphis
.450
4
4
.450
98
37.
Kansas State
.622
5
3
.549
29
 
90.
Wyoming
.449
4
4
.449
101
38.
Texas
.622
4
4
.622
2
 
91.
San Jose State
.443
5
4
.410
118
39.
Utah State
.617
6
2
.465
87
 
92.
South Alabama
.442
5
3
.369
130
40.
Fresno State
.615
7
2
.444
103
 
93.
Georgia Tech
.441
3
5
.517
49
41.
Iowa State
.609
5
3
.535
37
 
94.
Stanford
.441
3
5
.517
50
42.
Clemson
.604
5
3
.529
42
 
95.
Troy
.431
4
4
.431
111
43.
Northern Illinois
.602
6
2
.449
102
 
96.
Washington
.429
4
4
.429
112
44.
Miami, Fla.
.601
4
4
.601
5
 
97.
Hawaii
.417
4
5
.450
99
45.
Florida
.597
4
4
.597
6
 
98.
Rice
.415
3
5
.490
65
46.
Utah
.591
5
3
.516
53
 
99.
Tulsa
.410
3
5
.485
69
47.
Nevada
.585
6
2
.431
110
 
100.
Charlotte
.410
4
4
.410
119
48.
Liberty
.576
7
2
.404
123
 
101.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.408
4
4
.408
120
49.
Boise State
.575
4
4
.575
14
 
102.
Central Michigan
.408
4
4
.408
121
50.
LSU
.574
4
4
.574
17
 
103.
Duke
.405
3
5
.479
74
51.
Rutgers
.564
4
4
.564
19
 
104.
Navy
.399
2
6
.552
26
52.
West Virginia
.564
4
4
.564
20
 
105.
New Mexico
.399
3
5
.473
79
53.
UCF
.560
5
3
.485
70
 
106.
California
.398
3
5
.472
81
54.
Army
.558
4
3
.516
54
 
107.
Colorado State
.398
3
5
.472
82
55.
Texas Tech
.550
5
4
.516
52
 
108.
Temple
.382
3
5
.456
91
56.
Louisville
.548
4
4
.548
30
 
109.
Buffalo
.366
4
5
.398
124
57.
Western Michigan
.547
5
3
.472
83
 
110.
Bowling Green
.355
3
6
.453
94
58.
North Carolina
.546
4
4
.546
31
 
111.
South Florida
.349
2
6
.499
60
59.
South Carolina
.546
4
4
.546
33
 
112.
Kansas
.343
1
7
.580
10
60.
Tennessee
.544
4
4
.544
34
 
113.
Tulane
.343
1
7
.580
11
61.
Oregon State
.542
5
3
.466
86
 
114.
Louisiana Tech
.339
2
6
.488
67
62.
UCLA
.535
5
4
.501
58
 
115.
Vanderbilt
.336
2
7
.503
57
63.
Washington State
.530
5
4
.497
62
 
116.
Colorado
.333
2
6
.481
72
64.
Arizona State
.528
5
3
.453
95
 
117.
Texas State
.309
2
6
.453
93
65.
Syracuse
.525
5
4
.491
63
 
118.
Georgia Southern
.307
2
6
.452
96
66.
UTEP
.523
6
2
.371
129
 
119.
Old Dominion
.306
2
6
.451
97
67.
Virginia Tech
.520
4
4
.520
48
 
120.
North Texas
.300
2
6
.444
104
68.
LA Monroe
.517
4
4
.517
51
 
121.
Akron
.297
2
6
.440
106
69.
UAB
.516
5
3
.440
105
 
122.
Massachusetts
.261
1
7
.482
71
70.
Georgia State
.510
4
4
.510
55
 
123.
Southern Miss
.242
1
7
.458
90
71.
Eastern Michigan
.509
5
3
.434
108
 
124.
New Mexico State
.240
1
7
.455
92
72.
Illinois
.505
3
6
.605
4
 
125.
Arkansas State
.225
1
7
.434
107
73.
Florida Atlantic
.494
5
3
.419
116
 
126.
UNLV
.218
0
8
.527
46
74.
USC
.489
4
4
.489
66
 
127.
Ohio
.215
1
7
.420
114
75.
Nebraska
.484
3
6
.585
9
 
128.
Fla. International
.210
1
7
.412
117
76.
TCU
.480
3
5
.556
24
 
129.
Connecticut
.208
1
8
.420
115
77.
East Carolina
.475
4
4
.475
76
 
130.
Arizona
.200
0
8
.500
59
78.
Miami, Ohio
.474
4
4
.474
77
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s eighth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2021 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved