Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Top-5 Is Unchanged from Last Week

  • The 5 teams ranked between #4 and #8 (all with 10-1 win-loss records) are separated by just .009
  • This coming week features two top-10 matchups: #6 Ohio State at #3 Michigan, and #8 Oklahoma at #7 Oklahoma State
  • The Ohio State-Michigan game will be Ohio State’s first road game against the current top-25 and Michigan’s first home game against the current top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 22

Nov. 15 Rankings
Nov. 8 Rankings
Nov. 1 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings

Final 2020-21 Rankings
Final ’20 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.820
11
0
.532
43
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Cincinnati
.805
11
0
.508
55
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Michigan
.796
10
1
.571
17
0-1
2-0
0
4.
Notre Dame
.773
10
1
.537
38
0-1
2-0
0
5.
Alabama
.770
10
1
.533
42
0-0
1-1
0
6.
Ohio State
.768
10
1
.531
44
1-0
2-1
0
7.
Oklahoma St.
.767
10
1
.530
45
0-0
1-0
1
8.
Oklahoma
.764
10
1
.525
49
0-0
0-1
0
9.
Michigan St.
.742
9
2
.563
22
1-1
0-1
0
10.
Iowa
.735
9
2
.554
26
0-0
1-2
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Mississippi
.734
9
2
.552
29
  Big Ten
.624
33
9
.448
12.
Wisconsin
.733
8
3
.611
3
  Southeastern
.606
45
7
.375
13.
Baylor
.732
9
2
.550
31
  Big 12
.594
24
6
.408
14.
UTSA
.721
11
0
.393
126
  Atlantic Coast
.539
33
17
.442
15.
Wake Forest
.697
9
2
.507
56
  American Athletic
.494
23
19
.466
16.
Texas A&M
.690
8
3
.560
24
  Mountain West
.479
30
19
.412
17.
Purdue
.683
7
4
.607
4
  Pac-12
.468
16
18
.485
18.
BYU
.680
9
2
.487
65
  Sun Belt
.431
21
19
.417
19.
Houston
.679
10
1
.420
114
  Mid-American
.425
21
27
.462
20.
San Diego State
.678
10
1
.419
115
  Conference USA
.399
24
32
.441
21.
Louisiana 
.674
10
1
.413
118
  *non-conference play
22.
Pittsburgh
.669
9
2
.475
71
 
23.
Penn State
.668
7
4
.592
8
 
24.
Oregon
.662
9
2
.467
80
 
25.
Clemson
.662
8
3
.528
47
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Kentucky
.659
8
3
.525
48
 
79.
Kent State
.475
6
5
.448
96
27.
Arkansas
.659
7
4
.582
12
 
80.
Western Michigan
.471
6
5
.444
101
28.
Appalachian St.
.659
9
2
.463
82
 
81.
Nebraska
.468
3
8
.606
5
29.
N.C. State
.647
8
3
.512
53
 
82.
UTEP
.467
7
4
.386
129
30.
Kansas State
.636
7
4
.556
25
 
83.
Tulsa
.463
5
6
.490
62
31.
Mississippi State
.632
7
4
.552
28
 
84.
Memphis
.458
5
6
.485
66
32.
Utah
.631
8
3
.494
61
 
85.
Miami, Ohio
.452
6
5
.425
113
33.
Minnesota
.623
7
4
.543
35
 
86.
Toledo
.443
6
5
.416
116
34.
Boise State
.616
7
4
.536
39
 
87.
USC
.441
4
6
.501
59
35.
Auburn
.615
6
5
.589
9
 
88.
Indiana
.435
2
9
.632
1
36.
Air Force
.609
8
3
.470
76
 
89.
Ball State
.430
5
6
.457
89
37.
Tennessee
.608
6
5
.582
11
 
90.
Northwestern
.429
3
8
.568
19
38.
Fresno State
.598
8
3
.460
88
 
91.
Troy
.426
5
6
.453
91
39.
Iowa State
.598
6
5
.571
16
 
92.
San Jose State
.404
5
6
.431
108
40.
Miami, Fla.
.593
6
5
.567
20
 
93.
Georgia Tech
.404
3
8
.542
36
41.
South Carolina
.593
6
5
.566
21
 
94.
Colorado
.399
4
7
.480
70
42.
SMU
.591
8
3
.453
93
 
95.
Hawaii
.395
5
7
.444
99
43.
Army
.585
7
3
.464
81
 
96.
Navy
.392
2
8
.578
14
44.
Utah State
.579
8
3
.440
104
 
97.
LA Monroe
.391
4
7
.472
75
45.
Virginia
.579
6
5
.552
30
 
98.
South Alabama
.389
5
6
.415
117
46.
Coastal Carolina
.577
9
2
.378
130
 
99.
California
.387
4
6
.445
98
47.
Maryland
.576
5
6
.603
7
 
100.
Florida Atlantic
.385
5
6
.411
119
48.
Missouri
.573
6
5
.546
33
 
101.
North Texas
.378
5
6
.404
122
49.
Northern Illinois
.572
8
3
.433
107
 
102.
Old Dominion
.377
5
6
.403
123
50.
Louisville
.569
6
5
.542
37
 
103.
Stanford
.376
3
8
.513
52
51.
UCLA
.563
7
4
.481
67
 
104.
Kansas
.376
2
9
.574
15
52.
Texas Tech
.563
6
5
.536
40
 
105.
Washington
.376
4
7
.456
90
53.
West Virginia
.560
5
6
.586
10
 
106.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.363
5
6
.389
127
54.
North Carolina
.556
6
5
.529
46
 
107.
Charlotte
.361
5
6
.386
128
55.
LSU
.554
5
6
.581
13
 
108.
Duke
.352
3
8
.488
64
56.
Nevada
.550
7
4
.468
78
 
109.
Tulane
.352
2
9
.548
32
57.
UCF
.545
7
4
.463
83
 
110.
New Mexico
.345
3
8
.480
69
58.
East Carolina
.544
7
4
.462
84
 
111.
Temple
.340
3
8
.474
72
59.
Rutgers
.544
5
6
.571
18
 
112.
Vanderbilt
.339
2
9
.535
41
60.
Arizona State
.543
7
4
.460
87
 
113.
Rice
.339
3
8
.473
74
61.
Oregon State
.536
7
4
.453
92
 
114.
Colorado State
.336
3
8
.469
77
62.
TCU
.533
5
6
.560
23
 
115.
Georgia Southern
.334
3
8
.467
79
63.
Illinois
.532
4
7
.613
2
 
116.
Louisiana Tech
.328
3
8
.461
86
64.
Florida
.526
5
6
.553
27
 
117.
South Florida
.328
2
9
.522
50
65.
Texas
.525
4
7
.606
6
 
118.
Buffalo
.327
4
7
.404
121
66.
Liberty
.523
7
4
.441
103
 
119.
Texas State
.318
3
8
.450
94
67.
UAB
.521
7
4
.439
105
 
120.
UNLV
.316
2
9
.508
54
68.
Georgia State
.517
6
5
.489
63
 
121.
Bowling Green
.305
3
8
.434
106
69.
Florida State
.516
5
6
.543
34
 
122.
Ohio
.297
3
8
.425
112
70.
Western Kentucky
.509
7
4
.427
110
 
123.
Arkansas State
.277
2
9
.461
85
71.
Central Michigan
.508
7
4
.426
111
 
124.
Southern Miss
.263
2
9
.444
100
72.
Washington State
.507
6
5
.480
68
 
125.
Arizona
.256
1
10
.502
57
73.
Boston College
.500
6
5
.473
73
 
126.
Akron
.252
2
9
.430
109
74.
Syracuse
.489
5
6
.516
51
 
127.
New Mexico State
.251
1
10
.496
60
75.
Eastern Michigan
.487
7
4
.406
120
 
128.
Connecticut
.216
1
10
.447
97
76.
Marshall
.478
7
4
.397
125
 
129.
Massachusetts
.213
1
10
.443
102
77.
Virginia Tech
.475
5
6
.502
58
 
130.
Fla. International
.187
1
10
.403
124
78.
Wyoming
.475
6
5
.448
95
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s eighth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2021 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved