Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

The Top-4: Florida St., Oregon, Alabama, Ohio St.

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee (taken this offseason)

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • Undefeated Florida State has clearly earned the #1 ranking, having accomplished more than any other team during the regular season
  • #2 Oregon and #3 Alabama are far ahead of #4 Ohio State
  • The Buckeyes are comfortably ahead of #5 TCU
  • Nine of the top 15 teams are from either the SEC (4) or Pac-12 (5)
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 7

Dec. 1 Rankings
Nov. 24 Rankings
Nov. 17 Rankings
Nov.
10 Rankings
Nov. 3 Rankings

Oct. 27 Rankings
Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings

Final 2013-14 Rankings
Final '13 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida State
.825
13
0
.540
53
0-0
3-0
0
2.
Oregon
.814
12
1
.588
16
2-1
2-0
0
3.
Alabama
.808
12
1
.578
22
1-1
3-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.789
12
1
.549
47
0-0
2-0
1
5.
TCU
.779
11
1
.540
54
0-1
1-0
0
6.
Baylor
.765
11
1
.520
62
1-0
1-0
1
7.
UCLA
.755
9
3
.624
4
1-1
2-1
1
8.
Arizona
.755
10
3
.611
7
1-2
2-1
0
9.
Mississippi St.
.751
10
2
.564
36
0-2
2-0
0
10.
Mississippi
.732
9
3
.596
11
2-0
1-2
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Arizona State
.723
9
3
.584
18
  Southeastern
.645
48
7
.409
12. Michigan State
.723
10
2
.528
61
  Pac-12
.635
31
6
.424
13. Missouri
.717
10
3
.565
34
  Big 12
.583
22
8
.441
14. Georgia Tech
.715
10
3
.562
38
  Atlantic Coast
.581
42
14
.427
15. USC
.711
8
4
.621
5
  Big Ten
.579
42
14
.425
16. Georgia
.708
9
3
.566
33
  Mountain West
.479
27
24
.461
17. Auburn
.708
8
4
.617
6
  Conference USA
.431
24
28
.454
18. Boise State
.707
11
2
.499
66
  American Athletic
.415
16
28
.497
19. Kansas State
.707
9
3
.564
35
  Mid-American
.355
19
33
.433
20. Wisconsin
.702
10
3
.547
50
  Sun Belt
.333
11
32
.477
21. Clemson
.693
9
3
.548
49
  *non-conference play
22. Utah
.692
8
4
.599
8
 
23. Louisville
.685
9
3
.539
57
 
24. Nebraska
.678
9
3
.531
60
 
25. LSU
.674
8
4
.580
21
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Marshall
.664
12
1
.392
112
 
78.
Western Michigan
.473
8
4
.374
122
27.
Oklahoma
.664
8
4
.568
31
 
79.
San Diego State
.472
7
5
.423
99
28.
Colorado State
.650
10
2
.443
90
 
80.
Fresno State
.470
6
7
.493
67
29.
Stanford
.646
7
5
.599
9
 
81.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.461
6
6
.461
81
30.
Minnesota
.646
8
4
.548
48
 
82.
UAB
.447
6
6
.447
88
31.
Notre Dame
.641
7
5
.593
13
 
83.
Old Dominion
.443
6
6
.443
91
32.
West Virginia
.637
7
5
.589
14
 
84.
Indiana
.439
4
8
.540
56
33.
Texas A&M
.632
7
5
.584
19
 
85.
Houston
.434
7
5
.385
115
34.
Arkansas
.629
6
6
.629
1
 
86.
Bowling Green
.430
7
6
.408
104
35.
Washington
.620
8
5
.552
44
 
87.
Central Michigan
.428
7
5
.380
119
36.
Duke
.617
9
3
.465
79
 
88.
Arkansas State
.421
7
5
.373
123
37.
Florida
.611
6
5
.585
17
 
89.
Kansas
.420
3
9
.574
27
38.
Rutgers
.599
7
5
.550
45
 
90.
Syracuse
.418
3
9
.572
29
39.
Maryland
.599
7
5
.550
46
 
91.
Colorado
.418
2
10
.626
2
40.
Northern Illinois
.596
11
2
.378
120
 
92.
Temple
.418
6
6
.418
100
41.
Boston College
.595
7
5
.546
51
 
93.
Wyoming
.405
4
8
.506
65
42.
Texas
.594
6
6
.594
12
 
94.
South Alabama
.403
6
6
.403
109
43.
N.C. State
.589
7
5
.540
55
 
95.
Vanderbilt
.402
3
9
.555
41
44.
Tennessee
.588
6
6
.588
15
 
96.
Purdue
.401
3
9
.554
42
45.
Cincinnati
.584
9
3
.430
96
 
97.
Texas State
.398
7
5
.351
126
46.
Air Force
.582
9
3
.429
97
 
98.
New Mexico
.385
4
8
.485
71
47.
Miami, Fla.
.576
6
6
.576
25
 
99.
Wake Forest
.384
3
9
.537
58
48.
Oklahoma State
.575
6
6
.575
26
 
100.
Appalachian St.
.382
7
5
.336
128
49.
BYU
.571
8
4
.470
77
 
101.
Ohio
.382
6
6
.382
118
50.
Memphis
.571
9
3
.417
101
 
102.
Iowa State
.372
2
10
.581
20
51.
South Carolina
.569
6
6
.569
30
 
103.
UTSA
.363
4
8
.460
82
52.
Utah State
.565
9
4
.448
87
 
104.
South Florida
.352
4
8
.449
86
53.
Iowa
.556
7
5
.506
64
 
105.
Hawaii
.346
4
9
.459
83
54.
North Carolina
.555
6
6
.555
40
 
106.
Southern Miss
.342
3
9
.491
69
55.
Illinois
.552
6
6
.552
43
 
107.
Fla. International
.331
4
8
.426
98
56.
Central Florida
.550
9
3
.397
110
 
108.
San Jose State
.330
3
9
.478
73
57.
California
.549
5
7
.598
10
 
109.
Ball State
.330
5
7
.375
121
58.
Virginia Tech
.545
6
6
.545
52
 
110.
Florida Atlantic
.326
3
9
.474
75
59.
Louisiana Tech
.542
8
5
.472
76
 
111.
LA Monroe
.322
4
8
.417
102
60.
Georgia Southern
.540
9
3
.388
114
 
112.
Akron
.320
5
7
.365
125
61.
Nevada
.534
7
5
.484
72
 
113.
Tulane
.320
3
9
.466
78
62.
Penn State
.531
6
6
.531
59
 
114.
Buffalo
.319
5
6
.343
127
63.
Virginia
.527
5
7
.577
24
 
115.
North Texas
.314
4
8
.407
106
64.
Michigan
.523
5
7
.573
28
 
116.
Army
.310
4
7
.385
116
65.
Navy
.518
6
5
.491
68
 
117.
UNLV
.271
2
11
.474
74
66.
Oregon State
.518
5
7
.568
32
 
118.
Kent State
.255
2
9
.434
94
67.
Kentucky
.514
5
7
.564
37
 
119.
Massachusetts
.255
3
9
.389
113
68.
Western Kentucky
.512
7
5
.462
80
 
120.
Tulsa
.255
2
10
.444
89
69.
Pittsburgh
.508
6
6
.508
63
 
121.
Troy
.252
3
9
.385
117
70.
Northwestern
.508
5
7
.558
39
 
122.
Connecticut
.249
2
10
.437
93
71.
Toledo
.506
8
4
.406
107
 
123.
Eastern Michigan
.247
2
10
.434
95
72.
East Carolina
.504
8
4
.404
108
 
124.
SMU
.241
1
11
.488
70
73.
Rice
.502
7
5
.452
85
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.231
2
10
.412
103
74.
LA Lafayette
.492
8
4
.392
111
 
126.
Georgia State
.216
1
11
.453
84
75.
UTEP
.490
7
5
.440
92
 
127.
New Mexico State
.203
2
10
.372
124
76.
Texas Tech
.477
4
8
.578
23
 
128.
Idaho
.190
1
10
.407
105
77.
Washington State
.473
3
9
.625
3
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2014 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved