Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

The SEC West Is Best

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • Four of the top five teams in the country are from one-half of one conference
  • Undefeated Mississippi State is #1 by a wide margin, while the only other major undefeated team, Florida State, is #2
  • (6-1) Auburn has played the nation's toughest schedule to date and is #3
  • (7-1) Mississippi and (7-1) Alabama round out the top-5
  • 11 of the top 14 teams are from either the SEC or Pac-12
  • The highest-rated Big Ten team is #15
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 27

Oct. 20 Rankings

Oct. 13 Rankings

Oct. 6 Rankings

Final 2013-14 Rankings
Final '13 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Mississippi St.
.861
7
0
.607
9
1-0
2-0
0
2.
Florida State
.821
7
0
.534
41
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Auburn
.814
6
1
.637
1
1-1
2-0
0
4.
Mississippi
.808
7
1
.615
5
1-0
0-1
0
5.
Alabama
.789
7
1
.586
14
0-1
1-0
0
6.
Oregon
.779
7
1
.572
18
0-1
2-0
0
7.
Notre Dame
.770
6
1
.572
19
0-1
0-0
0
8.
Georgia
.761
6
1
.561
28
0-0
2-0
1
9.
Arizona
.756
6
1
.553
29
1-0
0-1
0
10.
Kansas State
.754
6
1
.551
31
0-1
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. UCLA
.747
6
2
.614
6
  Southeastern
.705
39
3
.434
12. Arizona State
.743
6
1
.536
39
  Pac-12
.631
29
5
.409
13. LSU
.741
7
2
.589
12
  Big Ten
.584
40
14
.437
14. Utah
.740
6
1
.532
43
  Big 12
.583
22
8
.441
15. Nebraska
.739
7
1
.518
49
  Atlantic Coast
.561
36
14
.427
16. TCU
.727
6
1
.516
53
  Mountain West
.484
25
23
.471
17. Michigan State
.724
7
1
.499
69
  Conference USA
.448
23
26
.467
18. Ohio State
.717
6
1
.503
65
  American Athletic
.427
16
26
.498
19. Clemson
.716
6
2
.576
17
  Mid-American
.357
19
33
.435
20. Marshall
.711
8
0
.380
121
  Sun Belt
.349
11
26
.468
21. West Virginia
.708
6
2
.566
22
  *non-conference play
22. Oklahoma
.705
5
2
.585
15
 
23. Colorado State
.696
7
1
.465
84
 
24. Missouri
.687
6
2
.542
38
 
25. USC
.687
5
3
.618
4
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Boise State
.682
6
2
.536
40
 
78.
Pittsburgh
.487
4
4
.487
72
27.
Baylor
.679
6
1
.458
87
 
79.
Bowling Green
.475
5
3
.401
116
28.
Texas A&M
.665
5
3
.595
10
 
80.
Western Michigan
.473
5
3
.399
117
29.
Minnesota
.656
6
2
.506
60
 
81.
Purdue
.469
3
5
.545
36
30.
Duke
.655
6
1
.431
102
 
82.
Indiana
.467
3
4
.510
56
31.
Georgia Tech
.650
6
2
.500
67
 
83.
Navy
.466
4
4
.466
83
32.
East Carolina
.637
6
1
.412
111
 
84.
Houston
.465
4
3
.422
107
33.
Louisville
.637
6
2
.485
73
 
85.
San Jose State
.460
3
4
.503
64
34.
Wisconsin
.633
5
2
.505
62
 
86.
Washington State
.458
2
6
.611
7
35.
Florida
.632
3
3
.632
2
 
87.
Fresno State
.447
3
5
.522
48
36.
Kentucky
.624
5
3
.551
32
 
88.
UAB
.446
4
4
.446
96
37.
Stanford
.622
5
3
.548
33
 
89.
San Diego State
.444
4
3
.402
115
38.
Miami, Fla.
.619
5
3
.546
35
 
90.
Wyoming
.442
3
5
.517
50
39.
South Carolina
.610
4
4
.610
8
 
91.
Florida Atlantic
.440
3
5
.515
54
40.
Maryland
.606
5
3
.532
42
 
92.
Central Michigan
.437
5
4
.404
113
41.
Oklahoma State
.601
5
3
.527
46
 
93.
Western Kentucky
.435
3
4
.478
76
42.
Arkansas
.595
4
4
.595
11
 
94.
Colorado
.434
2
6
.588
13
43.
Washington
.591
5
3
.516
51
 
95.
Southern Miss
.425
3
5
.500
68
44.
Central Florida
.585
5
2
.454
90
 
96.
Temple
.424
4
3
.383
119
45.
Nevada
.584
5
3
.510
57
 
97.
Texas State
.420
4
3
.379
122
46.
Rutgers
.583
5
3
.508
58
 
98.
Iowa State
.412
2
5
.542
37
47.
California
.578
4
4
.578
16
 
99.
Akron
.408
4
4
.408
112
48.
Boston College
.577
5
3
.502
66
 
100.
Vanderbilt
.408
2
6
.561
27
49.
Iowa
.574
5
2
.443
98
 
101.
LA Monroe
.395
3
4
.437
99
50.
Penn State
.569
4
3
.527
45
 
102.
Kansas
.392
2
5
.522
47
51.
North Carolina
.562
4
4
.562
26
 
103.
Old Dominion
.390
3
5
.464
85
52.
Louisiana Tech
.552
5
3
.477
77
 
104.
Ohio
.388
4
5
.420
108
53.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.549
5
3
.473
80
 
105.
South Florida
.375
3
5
.448
93
54.
Air Force
.549
5
2
.418
110
 
106.
Fla. International
.363
3
5
.436
100
55.
Oregon State
.549
4
3
.506
61
 
107.
UTSA
.349
2
6
.499
70
56.
Virginia Tech
.547
4
4
.547
34
 
108.
Wake Forest
.343
2
6
.492
71
57.
Memphis
.547
4
3
.504
63
 
109.
New Mexico
.338
2
5
.464
86
58.
Tennessee
.545
3
5
.619
3
 
110.
Tulane
.332
2
5
.457
88
59.
Georgia Southern
.543
6
2
.390
118
 
111.
Hawaii
.326
2
6
.474
79
60.
N.C. State
.531
4
4
.531
44
 
112.
UNLV
.324
2
6
.471
82
61.
Utah State
.527
5
3
.452
91
 
113.
Ball State
.314
3
5
.382
120
62.
Northern Illinois
.521
6
2
.369
126
 
114.
Eastern Michigan
.292
2
6
.434
101
63.
Cincinnati
.517
4
3
.474
78
 
115.
Buffalo
.287
3
5
.353
128
64.
Illinois
.516
4
4
.516
52
 
116.
North Texas
.287
2
6
.428
105
65.
LA Lafayette
.516
4
3
.473
81
 
117.
Tulsa
.270
1
6
.480
74
66.
BYU
.513
4
4
.513
55
 
118.
Massachusetts
.268
2
7
.422
106
67.
Northwestern
.510
3
4
.552
30
 
119.
Appalachian St.
.258
2
5
.370
124
68.
Virginia
.508
4
4
.508
59
 
120.
Georgia State
.258
1
7
.478
75
69.
South Alabama
.496
5
2
.368
127
 
121.
Army
.257
2
5
.370
125
70.
Syracuse
.496
3
5
.571
20
 
122.
Miami, Ohio
.253
2
7
.403
114
71.
Rice
.494
4
3
.451
92
 
123.
Idaho
.250
1
6
.455
89
72.
Toledo
.493
5
3
.418
109
 
124.
SMU
.247
0
7
.568
21
73.
UTEP
.491
4
3
.448
94
 
125.
New Mexico State
.246
2
6
.377
123
74.
Texas Tech
.490
3
5
.565
23
 
126.
Connecticut
.245
1
6
.447
95
75.
Michigan
.489
3
5
.564
24
 
127.
Troy
.223
1
7
.430
103
76.
Arkansas State
.488
4
3
.445
97
 
128.
Kent State
.223
1
7
.430
104
77.
Texas
.487
3
5
.563
25
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2014 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved