Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Three Unbeatens Remain on Top

  • The largest gap in the top-25 is between #2 LSU and #3 Clemson (.031), and the second-largest gap is between #1 Ohio State and #2 LSU (.021)
  • #4 Georgia (3-0 versus the current top-20, paired with a loss to below-average South Carolina) and #5 Oklahoma (2-1 in 3 road games versus the current top-30) have accomplished the most to date of any of the 1-loss teams, followed by #7 Baylor (2 road wins vs. the current top-30 and a loss only to #5 Oklahoma) and #9 Memphis (3 wins over the current top-25 and a lone loss at #35 Temple)
  • Michigan has played the nation’s toughest schedule (#1 out of 130)
  • After a 3-1 week in interconference play, the SEC moves from #4 to #2 in the conference rankings
  • The #6 ACC is about half way in between the #5 American Athletic Conference (.029 behind) and the #7 Mountain West Conference (.033 ahead), and is closer to the #8 Sun Belt (.064 ahead) than to the #1 Big Ten (.082)
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 2

Nov. 25 Rankings
Nov. 18 Rankings
Nov. 11 Rankings
Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings

Final 2018-19 Rankings
Final ’18 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Ohio State
.847
12
0
.579
15
2-0
2-0
0
2.
LSU
.826
12
0
.543
39
0-0
3-0
0
3.
Clemson
.795
12
0
.492
78
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Georgia
.786
11
1
.550
31
1-0
2-0
1
5.
Oklahoma
.785
11
1
.549
32
1-0
0-0
1
6.
Penn State
.769
10
2
.588
10
0-1
2-1
0
7.
Baylor
.768
11
1
.524
57
0-1
0-0
0
8.
Wisconsin
.768
10
2
.586
11
0-1
3-0
1
9.
Memphis
.762
11
1
.516
61
0-0
3-0
1
10.
Notre Dame
.753
10
2
.567
23
0-1
2-1
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Utah
.749
11
1
.499
75
  Big Ten
.616
34
8
.423
12.
Michigan
.741
9
3
.607
1
  Southeastern
.583
42
14
.429
13.
Cincinnati
.736
10
2
.545
36
  Big 12
.578
24
6
.392
14.
Boise State
.734
11
1
.480
83
  Pac-12
.574
24
12
.473
15.
Florida
.725
10
2
.531
51
  American Athletic
.563
33
14
.440
16.
Minnesota
.725
10
2
.530
52
  Atlantic Coast
.534
35
19
.444
17.
Iowa
.720
9
3
.581
13
  Mountain West
.501
31
18
.422
18.
Oregon
.717
10
2
.521
58
  Sun Belt
.470
22
18
.441
19.
Navy
.715
9
2
.529
54
  Conference USA
.404
24
32
.446
20.
Auburn
.713
9
3
.572
16
  Mid-American
.403
18
30
.478
21.
SMU
.711
10
2
.513
64
  *non-conference play
22.
Alabama
.703
10
2
.503
71
 
23.
Appalachian St.
.690
11
1
.426
106
 
24.
Air Force
.683
10
2
.480
82
 
25.
USC
.667
8
4
.572
17
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Oklahoma State
.654
8
4
.557
28
 
79.
Central Michigan
.477
8
4
.378
128
27.
Virginia
.643
9
3
.492
79
 
80.
Georgia State
.475
7
5
.425
107
28.
Kansas State
.642
8
4
.544
37
 
81.
Stanford
.470
4
8
.570
20
29.
UCF
.641
9
3
.490
80
 
82.
Southern Miss
.469
7
5
.420
112
30.
Texas
.641
7
5
.593
5
 
83.
South Florida
.467
4
8
.568
21
31.
Louisiana 
.631
10
2
.423
110
 
84.
Houston
.460
4
8
.561
25
32.
Indiana
.623
8
4
.525
56
 
85.
Buffalo
.459
7
5
.410
116
33.
Iowa State
.620
7
5
.571
18
 
86.
Syracuse
.459
5
7
.509
66
34.
Wake Forest
.608
8
4
.508
68
 
87.
Charlotte
.458
7
5
.409
117
35.
Temple
.607
8
4
.507
69
 
88.
Western Michigan
.449
7
5
.400
121
36.
Michigan State
.600
6
6
.600
3
 
89.
LA Monroe
.443
5
7
.493
77
37.
San Diego State
.598
9
3
.445
99
 
90.
Arizona
.443
4
8
.544
38
38.
Louisville
.595
7
5
.546
34
 
91.
Texas Tech
.440
4
8
.541
41
39.
Texas A&M
.595
7
5
.546
35
 
92.
Maryland
.440
3
9
.593
6
40.
Florida Atlantic
.594
9
3
.441
101
 
93.
Mississippi
.435
4
8
.536
43
41.
Washington
.591
7
5
.541
40
 
94.
Liberty
.434
7
5
.386
127
42.
Hawaii
.590
9
4
.474
90
 
95.
Kent State
.426
6
6
.426
105
43.
Tennessee
.587
7
5
.537
42
 
96.
Northwestern
.426
3
9
.579
14
44.
Arizona State
.580
7
5
.531
50
 
97.
San Jose State
.422
5
7
.471
92
45.
Utah State
.577
7
5
.527
55
 
98.
Kansas
.414
3
9
.568
22
46.
Virginia Tech
.576
8
4
.475
88
 
99.
Ohio
.402
6
6
.402
119
47.
California
.569
7
5
.519
59
 
100.
Toledo
.402
6
6
.402
120
48.
BYU
.566
7
5
.516
62
 
101.
N.C. State
.401
4
8
.501
72
49.
Pittsburgh
.564
7
5
.515
63
 
102.
Fresno State
.399
4
8
.499
74
50.
Mississippi State
.560
6
6
.560
26
 
103.
Georgia Tech
.399
3
9
.552
30
51.
Florida State
.556
6
6
.556
29
 
104.
Fla. International
.396
6
6
.396
122
52.
Kentucky
.551
7
5
.501
73
 
105.
Rutgers
.394
2
10
.603
2
53.
Marshall
.546
8
4
.445
98
 
106.
Eastern Michigan
.387
6
6
.387
126
54.
Boston College
.535
6
6
.535
45
 
107.
Army
.385
5
7
.434
104
55.
Tulane
.535
6
6
.535
46
 
108.
Vanderbilt
.382
3
9
.534
47
56.
TCU
.534
5
7
.583
12
 
109.
East Carolina
.379
4
8
.478
84
57.
North Carolina
.534
6
6
.534
48
 
110.
Coastal Carolina
.377
5
7
.425
108
58.
Illinois
.533
6
6
.533
49
 
111.
Troy
.376
5
7
.424
109
59.
Georgia Southern
.527
7
5
.477
86
 
112.
UNLV
.375
4
8
.474
89
60.
Wyoming
.526
7
5
.476
87
 
113.
Colorado State
.374
4
8
.472
91
61.
Nebraska
.521
5
7
.571
19
 
114.
Ball State
.374
5
7
.422
111
62.
Miami, Fla.
.517
6
6
.517
60
 
115.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.359
4
8
.457
94
63.
Colorado
.516
5
7
.565
24
 
116.
Northern Illinois
.358
5
7
.406
118
64.
Western Kentucky
.515
8
4
.415
115
 
117.
Arkansas
.330
2
10
.535
44
65.
Louisiana Tech
.511
9
3
.360
129
 
118.
Texas State
.330
3
9
.477
85
66.
Washington State
.510
6
6
.510
65
 
119.
North Texas
.322
4
8
.416
113
67.
West Virginia
.509
5
7
.559
27
 
120.
UTSA
.322
4
8
.416
114
68.
Arkansas State
.506
7
5
.456
95
 
121.
Rice
.316
3
9
.462
93
69.
Nevada
.504
7
5
.454
96
 
122.
Connecticut
.308
2
10
.509
67
70.
Missouri
.499
6
6
.499
76
 
123.
New Mexico
.305
2
10
.506
70
71.
Oregon State
.497
5
7
.547
33
 
124.
Bowling Green
.293
3
9
.435
103
72.
Tulsa
.494
4
8
.595
4
 
125.
South Alabama
.290
2
10
.488
81
73.
Miami, Ohio
.492
7
5
.442
100
 
126.
New Mexico State
.249
2
10
.436
102
74.
UCLA
.490
4
8
.591
7
 
127.
Old Dominion
.214
1
11
.449
97
75.
Purdue
.488
4
8
.589
8
 
128.
Massachusetts
.175
1
11
.390
124
76.
South Carolina
.488
4
8
.589
9
 
129.
UTEP
.175
1
11
.389
125
77.
UAB
.488
9
3
.339
130
 
130.
Akron
.140
0
12
.394
123
78.
Duke
.479
5
7
.529
53
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s sixth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2019 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved