Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

LSU Premiers on Top

  • If the season ended today, the Tigers would have accomplished the most, in terms of winning against tough foes, of any team
  • The Big Ten has been the top conference so far, while the American Athletic Conference has been one of the top 5 conferences
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 7

Final 2018-19 Rankings
Final ’18 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
LSU
.827
5
0
.544
26
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.823
6
0
.537
29
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Clemson
.812
5
0
.519
46
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Florida
.810
6
0
.516
50
1-0
0-0
0
5.
Wisconsin
.809
5
0
.515
51
0-0
1-0
0
6.
SMU
.804
6
0
.507
57
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Auburn
.794
5
1
.623
2
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Alabama
.793
5
0
.489
74
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Appalachian St.
.783
4
0
.475
81
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Boise State
.782
5
0
.473
83
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Penn State
.778
5
0
.467
87
  Big Ten
.630
31
8
.448
12.
Wake Forest
.777
5
0
.465
90
  Southeastern
.618
31
10
.462
13.
Georgia
.761
5
0
.442
100
  Big 12
.609
24
6
.423
14.
Oklahoma
.755
5
0
.435
104
  Pac-12
.591
24
10
.466
15.
Memphis
.755
5
0
.435
105
  American Athletic
.579
31
13
.454
16.
Baylor
.751
5
0
.430
109
  Atlantic Coast
.574
29
12
.448
17.
Michigan
.741
4
1
.574
11
  Mountain West
.514
26
16
.443
18.
Texas
.739
4
1
.571
14
  Sun Belt
.470
19
18
.462
19.
Minnesota
.737
5
0
.412
121
  Conference USA
.420
20
29
.474
20.
Cincinnati
.735
4
1
.566
17
  Mid-American
.399
17
30
.481
21.
Iowa
.724
4
1
.553
23
  *non-conference play
22.
Oregon
.714
4
1
.540
27
 
23.
Notre Dame
.709
4
1
.534
33
 
24.
Arizona State
.703
4
1
.527
36
 
25.
Michigan State
.695
4
2
.603
5
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Virginia
.695
4
1
.518
49
 
79.
Western Michigan
.483
3
3
.483
77
27.
Arizona
.691
4
1
.513
52
 
80.
UAB
.479
4
1
.302
130
28.
Mississippi State
.673
3
2
.618
3
 
81.
Virginia Tech
.479
3
2
.419
114
29.
Hawaii
.662
4
1
.479
80
 
82.
Georgia State
.477
3
2
.417
116
30.
Tulane
.657
4
1
.474
82
 
83.
Coastal Carolina
.475
3
2
.415
118
31.
Navy
.651
3
1
.501
62
 
84.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.474
2
3
.535
32
32.
Wyoming
.645
4
1
.461
91
 
85.
Boston College
.473
3
3
.473
84
33.
Florida State
.644
3
2
.587
9
 
86.
Arkansas State
.470
3
3
.470
86
34.
Louisiana 
.636
4
1
.451
97
 
87.
Georgia Southern
.463
2
3
.524
39
35.
Washington
.636
4
2
.538
28
 
88.
Washington State
.461
3
2
.402
125
36.
Missouri
.634
4
1
.449
98
 
89.
Texas State
.460
2
3
.520
45
37.
Pittsburgh
.631
4
2
.532
34
 
90.
Fresno State
.454
2
2
.454
94
38.
Colorado
.629
3
2
.571
15
 
91.
LA Monroe
.450
2
3
.510
54
39.
California
.629
4
2
.530
35
 
92.
Oregon State
.442
2
3
.502
59
40.
Oklahoma State
.624
4
2
.525
38
 
93.
Marshall
.442
2
3
.502
60
41.
USC
.612
3
2
.554
22
 
94.
Miami, Fla.
.438
2
3
.498
65
42.
Toledo
.607
4
1
.421
113
 
95.
Charlotte
.438
2
3
.498
66
43.
Air Force
.605
3
2
.546
25
 
96.
North Texas
.436
2
3
.496
69
44.
North Carolina
.602
3
3
.602
6
 
97.
Western Kentucky
.434
3
2
.376
126
45.
Utah
.601
4
1
.414
119
 
98.
Central Michigan
.434
3
3
.434
106
46.
UCF
.597
4
2
.497
68
 
99.
Houston
.431
2
3
.490
73
47.
Texas A&M
.596
3
2
.537
30
 
100.
South Florida
.428
2
3
.488
75
48.
Nebraska
.595
4
2
.494
70
 
101.
East Carolina
.418
3
3
.418
115
49.
Temple
.592
4
1
.405
123
 
102.
Kansas
.417
2
4
.518
47
50.
Louisiana Tech
.589
4
1
.403
124
 
103.
Ohio
.407
2
3
.466
88
51.
Duke
.581
3
2
.521
40
 
104.
Northwestern
.401
1
4
.587
8
52.
Syracuse
.581
3
2
.521
41
 
105.
Purdue
.397
1
4
.583
10
53.
Louisville
.581
3
2
.521
42
 
106.
Illinois
.393
2
3
.452
96
54.
Iowa State
.581
3
2
.521
43
 
107.
Buffalo
.391
2
4
.491
72
55.
West Virginia
.578
3
2
.518
48
 
108.
New Mexico
.381
2
3
.440
103
56.
Maryland
.571
3
2
.511
53
 
109.
Vanderbilt
.375
1
4
.561
19
57.
Tulsa
.570
2
3
.628
1
 
110.
Arkansas
.372
2
3
.429
110
58.
Kansas State
.564
3
2
.504
58
 
111.
UTSA
.368
2
3
.425
111
59.
TCU
.562
3
2
.502
61
 
112.
Ball State
.368
2
3
.425
112
60.
Stanford
.561
3
3
.561
18
 
113.
UCLA
.365
1
5
.573
12
61.
Utah State
.561
3
2
.501
63
 
114.
Rutgers
.365
1
4
.550
24
62.
Florida Atlantic
.560
3
2
.500
64
 
115.
Troy
.356
2
3
.413
120
63.
Texas Tech
.557
3
2
.497
67
 
116.
Fla. International
.352
2
3
.409
122
64.
San Diego State
.557
4
1
.371
127
 
117.
Georgia Tech
.351
1
4
.535
31
65.
Indiana
.544
3
2
.484
76
 
118.
Tennessee
.343
1
4
.526
37
66.
Army
.531
3
2
.471
85
 
119.
Bowling Green
.328
1
4
.509
56
67.
Kentucky
.530
2
3
.590
7
 
120.
UNLV
.315
1
4
.494
71
68.
Nevada
.527
3
2
.466
89
 
121.
Colorado State
.284
1
5
.481
78
69.
Mississippi
.520
3
3
.520
44
 
122.
South Alabama
.283
1
5
.480
79
70.
N.C. State
.519
3
2
.458
92
 
123.
Old Dominion
.280
1
4
.453
95
71.
Liberty
.517
4
2
.416
117
 
124.
Rice
.278
0
6
.606
4
72.
Southern Miss
.517
3
2
.456
93
 
125.
Connecticut
.276
1
4
.447
99
73.
Miami, Ohio
.513
2
3
.572
13
 
126.
UTEP
.271
1
4
.442
101
74.
South Carolina
.508
2
3
.568
16
 
127.
Northern Illinois
.264
1
4
.432
108
75.
San Jose State
.501
3
2
.441
102
 
128.
New Mexico State
.206
0
6
.509
55
76.
Kent State
.498
2
3
.558
20
 
129.
Massachusetts
.192
1
5
.357
129
77.
BYU
.494
2
3
.555
21
 
130.
Akron
.127
0
5
.368
128
78.
Eastern Michigan
.492
3
2
.432
107
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2019 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved