Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Buckeyes and Nittany Lions Are #1-2

  • The top 2 spots are filled by teams from the best conference to date, the Big Ten
  • None of the teams ranked between #4 and #10 have a win versus the current top-25, let alone versus the current top-10, as there have been remarkably few games so far involving highly ranked teams
  • Navy and Air Force both make the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 28

Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings

Final 2018-19 Rankings
Final ’18 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Ohio State
.834
8
0
.556
24
1-0
0-0
0
2.
Penn State
.830
8
0
.550
30
0-0
2-0
0
3.
LSU
.822
8
0
.536
38
0-0
2-0
0
4.
Clemson
.818
8
0
.530
42
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Baylor
.809
7
0
.514
59
0-0
0-0
0
6.
SMU
.801
8
0
.501
70
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Alabama
.789
8
0
.483
83
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Minnesota
.774
8
0
.461
94
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Cincinnati
.772
6
1
.575
15
0-1
0-0
0
10.
Appalachian St.
.771
7
0
.456
99
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Oregon
.735
7
1
.512
62
  Big Ten
.627
33
8
.439
12.
Auburn
.732
6
2
.596
8
  Big 12
.591
24
6
.405
13.
Florida
.732
7
1
.509
66
  Southeastern
.591
31
11
.445
14.
Oklahoma
.727
7
1
.502
68
  American Athletic
.576
33
13
.443
15.
Navy
.726
6
1
.514
60
  Pac-12
.571
24
11
.458
16.
Wake Forest
.725
6
1
.513
61
  Atlantic Coast
.562
30
12
.432
17.
Michigan
.724
6
2
.586
10
  Mountain West
.497
28
17
.424
18.
Boise State
.712
6
1
.498
73
  Sun Belt
.465
21
18
.442
19.
Memphis
.711
7
1
.483
82
  Conference USA
.411
22
29
.451
20.
Utah
.702
7
1
.472
90
  Mid-American
.402
18
30
.477
21.
Iowa
.702
6
2
.559
23
  *non-conference play
22.
Georgia
.700
6
1
.483
84
 
23.
Wisconsin
.698
6
2
.554
27
 
24.
Notre Dame
.683
5
2
.559
22
 
25.
Air Force
.670
6
2
.523
49
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Kansas State
.669
5
2
.544
32
 
79.
West Virginia
.489
3
4
.532
41
27.
Louisville
.654
5
3
.583
12
 
80.
Southern Miss
.488
5
3
.413
119
28.
San Diego State
.653
7
1
.417
118
 
81.
Colorado
.486
3
5
.561
20
29.
Indiana
.651
6
2
.501
69
 
82.
Arkansas State
.486
4
4
.486
80
30.
UCF
.649
6
2
.499
71
 
83.
Maryland
.485
3
5
.560
21
31.
Texas
.647
5
3
.575
14
 
84.
Nevada
.485
4
4
.485
81
32.
USC
.639
5
3
.566
18
 
85.
Western Kentucky
.480
5
3
.405
120
33.
Oklahoma State
.628
5
3
.555
26
 
86.
Western Michigan
.472
5
4
.439
109
34.
Michigan State
.621
4
4
.621
3
 
87.
LA Monroe
.467
3
4
.510
65
35.
Iowa State
.616
5
3
.543
33
 
88.
Houston
.453
3
5
.529
43
36.
Texas A&M
.616
5
3
.543
34
 
89.
San Jose State
.451
4
4
.451
103
37.
Washington
.608
5
3
.534
39
 
90.
Kansas
.450
3
5
.525
46
38.
Louisiana 
.604
5
2
.474
89
 
91.
Purdue
.449
2
6
.602
6
39.
Florida State
.604
4
4
.604
5
 
92.
Mississippi
.443
3
5
.518
53
40.
Pittsburgh
.601
5
3
.526
45
 
93.
Texas Tech
.443
3
5
.518
54
41.
North Carolina
.599
4
4
.599
7
 
94.
Syracuse
.443
3
5
.518
55
42.
TCU
.597
4
3
.555
25
 
95.
Ohio
.441
4
4
.441
106
43.
Utah State
.594
4
3
.552
29
 
96.
Liberty
.440
5
3
.367
127
44.
Virginia
.593
5
3
.519
52
 
97.
Buffalo
.440
4
4
.440
108
45.
Wyoming
.586
6
2
.433
113
 
98.
Ball State
.439
4
4
.439
110
46.
Temple
.585
5
3
.510
64
 
99.
Eastern Michigan
.434
4
4
.434
112
47.
Louisiana Tech
.579
7
1
.343
129
 
100.
Georgia Tech
.422
2
5
.553
28
48.
Arizona State
.569
5
3
.494
74
 
101.
Central Michigan
.420
5
4
.387
123
49.
Stanford
.567
4
4
.567
17
 
102.
Fresno State
.417
3
4
.459
97
50.
Tulane
.567
5
3
.492
76
 
103.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.416
3
5
.490
79
51.
Hawaii
.566
5
3
.491
78
 
104.
Rutgers
.412
2
6
.565
19
52.
Virginia Tech
.556
5
2
.425
114
 
105.
Vanderbilt
.397
2
5
.527
44
53.
Georgia State
.552
6
2
.399
121
 
106.
Coastal Carolina
.393
3
4
.435
111
54.
Mississippi State
.548
3
5
.621
2
 
107.
Texas State
.392
2
5
.522
50
55.
Nebraska
.546
4
4
.546
31
 
108.
Northwestern
.390
1
6
.615
4
56.
Florida Atlantic
.544
5
3
.468
91
 
109.
East Carolina
.386
3
5
.460
95
57.
BYU
.543
3
4
.586
11
 
110.
Charlotte
.384
3
5
.458
98
58.
Marshall
.541
5
3
.466
92
 
111.
Fla. International
.382
4
4
.382
125
59.
Boston College
.541
4
4
.541
36
 
112.
North Texas
.379
3
5
.452
101
60.
Kentucky
.540
4
4
.540
37
 
113.
Army
.378
3
5
.452
102
61.
Missouri
.528
5
3
.452
100
 
114.
Kent State
.375
3
5
.448
104
62.
Illinois
.525
4
4
.525
47
 
115.
Colorado State
.373
3
5
.446
105
63.
Duke
.524
4
4
.524
48
 
116.
Arkansas
.369
2
6
.521
51
64.
Georgia Southern
.520
4
3
.477
86
 
117.
Northern Illinois
.351
3
5
.423
115
65.
South Florida
.516
4
4
.516
56
 
118.
Troy
.348
3
4
.387
122
66.
Miami, Fla.
.516
4
4
.516
57
 
119.
UTSA
.342
3
4
.382
126
67.
California
.514
4
4
.514
58
 
120.
UNLV
.333
2
6
.481
85
68.
UCLA
.512
3
5
.587
9
 
121.
Bowling Green
.328
2
6
.475
87
69.
Arizona
.512
4
4
.512
63
 
122.
Connecticut
.328
2
6
.475
88
70.
N.C. State
.508
4
3
.465
93
 
123.
New Mexico
.297
2
6
.440
107
71.
Miami, Ohio
.508
4
4
.508
67
 
124.
South Alabama
.268
1
7
.491
77
72.
UAB
.506
6
1
.291
130
 
125.
Old Dominion
.244
1
7
.460
96
73.
South Carolina
.502
3
5
.577
13
 
126.
Rice
.229
0
8
.543
35
74.
Tulsa
.499
2
6
.649
1
 
127.
UTEP
.224
1
6
.420
116
75.
Tennessee
.495
3
5
.570
16
 
128.
New Mexico State
.199
0
8
.499
72
76.
Washington State
.494
4
4
.494
75
 
129.
Massachusetts
.180
1
7
.367
128
77.
Toledo
.493
5
3
.418
117
 
130.
Akron
.134
0
8
.383
124
78.
Oregon State
.491
3
4
.534
40
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2019 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved