Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Ohio St. Retakes the #1 Spot

  • The Buckeyes move to #1 as #10 Michigan looms
  • LSU, Clemson, and Georgia claim the #2-4 spots
  • #5 Penn St. has played the 2nd-toughest schedule out of 130 teams and has gone 9-2
  • #16 Alabama hasn’t beaten a team in the current top-35, is one of only two teams in the top-16 with a home loss, and has posted 7 of its 10 wins over below-average teams
  • The Big Ten, the top conference to date—based on success in non-conference play—has 4 teams in the current top-10
  • The Pac-12, which has only 2 below-average teams and no bottom-40 teams, overtakes the SEC for the #3 spot in the conference rankings
  • The Power 5? The American Athletic Conference, which is just .003 behind the SEC, is far (.028) ahead of the ACC for the #5 spot in the conference rankings
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 25

Nov. 18 Rankings
Nov. 11 Rankings
Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings

Final 2018-19 Rankings
Final ’18 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Ohio State
.837
11
0
.563
20
2-0
1-0
0
2.
LSU
.825
11
0
.541
40
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Clemson
.804
11
0
.506
69
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Georgia
.781
10
1
.549
31
0-0
3-0
1
5.
Penn State
.779
9
2
.612
2
1-2
1-0
0
6.
Cincinnati
.772
10
1
.537
42
0-1
0-0
0
7.
Oklahoma
.772
10
1
.537
43
1-0
0-0
1
8.
Baylor
.768
10
1
.531
51
0-1
0-0
0
9.
Minnesota
.763
10
1
.523
59
1-0
0-1
0
10.
Michigan
.762
9
2
.589
10
0-1
2-1
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Notre Dame
.758
9
2
.584
12
  Big Ten
.619
34
8
.427
12.
Wisconsin
.752
9
2
.576
15
  Big 12
.580
24
6
.394
13.
Utah
.745
10
1
.500
73
  Pac-12
.577
24
11
.465
14.
Memphis
.740
10
1
.493
78
  Southeastern
.572
39
13
.418
15.
Boise State
.735
10
1
.486
83
  American Athletic
.569
33
14
.445
16.
Alabama
.734
10
1
.484
84
  Atlantic Coast
.541
34
16
.432
17.
Iowa
.720
8
3
.595
6
  Mountain West
.494
29
18
.424
18.
Oregon
.712
9
2
.524
55
  Sun Belt
.471
22
18
.441
19.
Florida
.711
9
2
.524
56
  Conference USA
.408
24
32
.451
20.
SMU
.710
9
2
.523
60
  Mid-American
.403
18
30
.477
21.
Navy
.710
8
2
.535
46
  *non-conference play
22.
Appalachian St.
.690
10
1
.432
105
 
23.
Auburn
.689
8
3
.558
24
 
24.
Air Force
.672
9
2
.478
88
 
25.
USC
.671
8
4
.577
14
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Oklahoma State
.668
8
3
.535
45
 
79.
West Virginia
.477
4
7
.560
22
27.
Wake Forest
.657
8
3
.523
58
 
80.
UAB
.476
8
3
.342
130
28.
Iowa State
.644
7
4
.565
19
 
81.
Tulsa
.474
3
8
.612
1
29.
Louisville
.638
7
4
.559
23
 
82.
Stanford
.472
4
7
.555
26
30.
Virginia
.636
8
3
.499
74
 
83.
Houston
.466
4
7
.548
33
31.
UCF
.636
8
3
.499
75
 
84.
Central Michigan
.465
7
4
.384
128
32.
Texas
.629
6
5
.603
4
 
85.
LA Monroe
.461
5
6
.489
81
33.
Louisiana 
.619
9
2
.421
113
 
86.
Duke
.461
4
7
.544
38
34.
Kansas State
.617
7
4
.536
44
 
87.
Arizona
.461
4
7
.544
39
35.
Virginia Tech
.612
8
3
.474
89
 
88.
Charlotte
.457
6
5
.430
106
36.
Temple
.610
7
4
.529
53
 
89.
Maryland
.455
3
8
.594
8
37.
Texas A&M
.608
7
4
.527
54
 
90.
Buffalo
.454
6
5
.427
109
38.
Indiana
.602
7
4
.520
61
 
91.
Texas Tech
.451
4
7
.533
48
39.
Pittsburgh
.599
7
4
.518
63
 
92.
Mississippi
.447
4
7
.529
52
40.
BYU
.592
7
4
.510
66
 
93.
Syracuse
.434
4
7
.516
65
41.
Michigan State
.584
5
6
.610
3
 
94.
Fresno State
.423
4
7
.505
70
42.
Utah State
.581
6
5
.555
25
 
95.
N.C. State
.423
4
7
.505
72
43.
Florida State
.581
6
5
.554
27
 
96.
Toledo
.421
6
5
.395
123
44.
Hawaii
.580
8
4
.479
87
 
97.
Liberty
.420
6
5
.394
124
45.
Florida Atlantic
.578
8
3
.439
102
 
98.
Fla. International
.418
6
5
.391
125
46.
Tennessee
.577
6
5
.550
30
 
99.
Eastern Michigan
.412
6
5
.386
127
47.
San Diego State
.574
8
3
.435
104
 
100.
Kansas
.410
3
8
.548
32
48.
Washington
.574
6
5
.547
34
 
101.
Georgia Tech
.408
3
8
.546
35
49.
Illinois
.571
6
5
.545
37
 
102.
Kent State
.403
5
6
.429
107
50.
Arizona State
.567
6
5
.540
41
 
103.
Ohio
.401
5
6
.428
108
51.
TCU
.561
5
6
.588
11
 
104.
East Carolina
.401
4
7
.483
85
52.
Miami, Fla.
.559
6
5
.532
50
 
105.
Army
.394
5
6
.421
112
53.
Arkansas State
.553
7
4
.470
91
 
106.
Rutgers
.392
2
9
.591
9
54.
California
.551
6
5
.523
57
 
107.
San Jose State
.392
4
7
.473
90
55.
Tulane
.545
6
5
.518
64
 
108.
Vanderbilt
.381
3
8
.519
62
56.
Nevada
.545
7
4
.462
93
 
109.
Troy
.380
5
6
.406
120
57.
Mississippi State
.539
5
6
.566
17
 
110.
Northwestern
.379
2
9
.577
13
58.
Wyoming
.539
7
4
.456
94
 
111.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.372
4
7
.452
96
59.
Marshall
.534
7
4
.452
97
 
112.
Colorado State
.371
4
7
.450
99
60.
Miami, Ohio
.534
7
4
.452
98
 
113.
Coastal Carolina
.362
4
7
.441
100
61.
North Carolina
.533
5
6
.560
21
 
114.
Texas State
.356
3
8
.492
79
62.
Washington State
.532
6
5
.505
71
 
115.
Ball State
.342
4
7
.419
114
63.
Nebraska
.525
5
6
.552
28
 
116.
North Texas
.338
4
7
.415
115
64.
Colorado
.525
5
6
.552
29
 
117.
Arkansas
.338
2
9
.533
49
65.
Kentucky
.519
6
5
.491
80
 
118.
UNLV
.335
3
8
.469
92
66.
Boston College
.518
5
6
.545
36
 
119.
UTSA
.334
4
7
.411
116
67.
UCLA
.515
4
7
.597
5
 
120.
Northern Illinois
.332
4
7
.409
118
68.
Purdue
.513
4
7
.594
7
 
121.
Connecticut
.317
2
9
.509
67
69.
Western Kentucky
.509
7
4
.427
110
 
122.
Bowling Green
.309
3
8
.439
103
70.
Georgia Southern
.508
6
5
.481
86
 
123.
New Mexico
.307
2
9
.498
76
71.
Oregon State
.507
5
6
.534
47
 
124.
Rice
.303
2
9
.493
77
72.
Georgia State
.506
7
4
.424
111
 
125.
New Mexico State
.261
2
9
.441
101
73.
Louisiana Tech
.502
8
3
.365
129
 
126.
South Alabama
.246
1
10
.488
82
74.
Western Michigan
.492
7
4
.410
117
 
127.
Old Dominion
.221
1
10
.453
95
75.
Southern Miss
.489
7
4
.408
119
 
128.
UTEP
.188
1
10
.404
121
76.
South Carolina
.486
4
7
.568
16
 
129.
Massachusetts
.175
1
11
.388
126
77.
South Florida
.484
4
7
.566
18
 
130.
Akron
.143
0
11
.400
122
78.
Missouri
.480
5
6
.507
68
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s sixth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2019 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved