Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

The Spartans Climb from #10 to #4

Four Is Enough

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • With their win at peviously undefeated Ohio State, the Michigan State Spartans vault from #10 into a top-4 spot
  • (9-1) Navy, whose only loss has been on the road to #5 Notre Dame, has been one of the ten most successful teams to date
  • #12 Stanford, the highest-ranked 2-loss team, hosts the Irish on Saturday and will play in the Pac-12 Championship Game the following weekend, so the (9-2) Cardinal has a chance to move up significantly
  • To win out over the next two weeks, each of the top 13 teams will have to beat a team that’s currently ranked in the top-25, so there should be plenty of movement in the rankings before the playoff field and bowl pairings are announced
  • There is a wide gap between the top four conferences (the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, and Pac-12) and the ACC
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 23

Nov. 16 Rankings
Nov. 9 Rankings
Nov. 2 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings
Oct. 19 Rankings
Oct. 12 Rankings

Final 2014-15 Rankings
Final '14 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Iowa
.821
11
0
.534
49
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Clemson
.808
11
0
.512
67
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Alabama
.799
10
1
.575
24
0-0
3-1
0
4.
Michigan State
.796
10
1
.572
25
1-0
2-0
1
5.
Notre Dame
.795
10
1
.570
29
1-1
0-0
0
6.
Oklahoma
.790
10
1
.562
36
1-0
1-0
1
7.
Florida
.781
10
1
.549
43
0-0
1-1
0
8.
Ohio State
.767
10
1
.528
57
0-1
0-0
0
9.
Navy
.758
9
1
.524
59
0-1
0-0
0
10.
Baylor
.758
9
1
.524
60
0-1
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Oklahoma State
.756
10
1
.514
65
  Southeastern
.629
44
7
.400
12. Stanford
.756
9
2
.581
18
  Big Ten
.624
43
13
.460
13. Michigan
.755
9
2
.580
19
  Big 12
.595
23
7
.431
14. Northwestern
.745
9
2
.566
32
  Pac-12
.583
28
8
.412
15. TCU
.719
9
2
.534
50
  Atlantic Coast
.538
34
18
.445
16. Utah
.714
8
3
.588
12
  American Athletic
.505
28
19
.447
17. LSU
.713
7
3
.604
6
  Mid-American
.433
21
30
.486
18. Oregon
.711
8
3
.584
14
  Mountain West
.403
18
29
.472
19. North Carolina
.709
10
1
.454
88
  Conference USA
.388
20
32
.456
20. Mississippi
.709
8
3
.581
17
  Sun Belt
.377
14
30
.485
21. UCLA
.700
8
3
.571
27
  *non-conference play
22. Toledo
.700
9
1
.450
89
 
23. Houston
.697
10
1
.440
94
 
24. Mississippi State
.694
8
3
.565
34
 
25. Texas A&M
.688
8
3
.557
39
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
USC
.681
7
4
.605
5
 
78.
Rutgers
.475
4
7
.557
37
27.
Georgia
.676
8
3
.544
46
 
79.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.474
6
5
.446
91
28.
Temple
.674
9
2
.480
77
 
80.
Iowa State
.473
3
8
.611
4
29.
Memphis
.673
8
3
.540
47
 
81.
Tulsa
.473
5
6
.500
70
30.
Florida State
.671
9
2
.477
78
 
82.
Virginia
.468
4
7
.550
42
31.
Pittsburgh
.664
8
3
.530
52
 
83.
Akron
.457
6
5
.430
99
32.
Tennessee
.663
7
4
.586
13
 
84.
Utah State
.454
6
5
.427
103
33.
Washington State
.663
8
3
.529
56
 
85.
South Carolina
.443
3
8
.582
16
34.
Wisconsin
.655
8
3
.520
61
 
86.
Maryland
.440
2
9
.637
1
35.
BYU
.644
8
3
.508
69
 
87.
Colorado
.429
4
8
.530
54
36.
Arkansas
.642
6
5
.616
2
 
88.
Georgia Tech
.428
3
8
.567
31
37.
Penn State
.636
7
4
.556
41
 
89.
Colorado State
.427
6
5
.401
118
38.
Western Kentucky
.627
9
2
.429
100
 
90.
Syracuse
.418
3
8
.557
38
39.
West Virginia
.626
6
4
.568
30
 
91.
New Mexico
.409
6
5
.383
123
40.
Bowling Green
.623
8
3
.485
74
 
92.
Nevada
.408
6
5
.381
124
41.
California
.619
6
5
.593
9
 
93.
Buffalo
.404
5
6
.431
98
42.
South Florida
.611
7
4
.530
51
 
94.
Purdue
.394
2
9
.592
10
43.
Arizona State
.605
6
5
.579
21
 
95.
Wake Forest
.392
3
8
.530
53
44.
Miami, Fla.
.598
7
4
.516
64
 
96.
San Jose State
.390
5
6
.417
107
45.
Texas Tech
.592
6
5
.565
33
 
97.
South Alabama
.386
5
5
.386
121
46.
Auburn
.591
6
5
.564
35
 
98.
Oregon State
.384
2
9
.583
15
47.
Minnesota
.566
5
6
.593
8
 
99.
Boston College
.380
3
8
.517
63
48.
Appalachian St.
.563
8
2
.378
126
 
100.
Old Dominion
.370
5
6
.395
119
49.
Louisville
.556
6
5
.529
55
 
101.
Georgia State
.369
4
6
.427
102
50.
Northern Illinois
.554
8
3
.415
108
 
102.
Tulane
.349
3
8
.484
75
51.
Missouri
.553
5
6
.580
20
 
103.
SMU
.349
2
9
.545
44
52.
Marshall
.551
9
2
.355
128
 
104.
Fla. International
.341
5
7
.387
120
53.
Nebraska
.551
5
6
.578
22
 
105.
Rice
.339
4
7
.417
106
54.
Air Force
.547
8
3
.408
113
 
106.
Idaho
.336
3
8
.470
80
55.
Washington
.545
5
6
.572
26
 
107.
Ball State
.334
3
8
.467
81
56.
Arizona
.544
6
6
.544
45
 
108.
UTEP
.332
4
7
.409
112
57.
Indiana
.544
5
6
.571
28
 
109.
Fresno State
.332
3
8
.465
83
58.
Texas
.543
4
6
.602
7
 
110.
Kent State
.330
3
8
.463
85
59.
Arkansas State
.542
7
3
.420
105
 
111.
LA Lafayette
.322
4
6
.377
127
60.
Louisiana Tech
.540
8
3
.402
116
 
112.
Troy
.319
3
7
.433
95
61.
Cincinnati
.539
6
5
.512
66
 
113.
UNLV
.318
3
8
.449
90
62.
N.C. State
.539
7
4
.456
86
 
114.
New Mexico State
.314
3
7
.427
101
63.
Illinois
.529
5
6
.556
40
 
115.
UTSA
.311
3
8
.442
93
64.
Georgia Southern
.523
7
3
.402
117
 
116.
Texas State
.299
3
7
.411
110
65.
San Diego State
.523
8
3
.385
122
 
117.
Miami, Ohio
.290
3
9
.431
97
66.
Southern Miss
.517
8
3
.379
125
 
118.
Kansas
.284
0
11
.613
3
67.
Kansas State
.517
4
6
.576
23
 
119.
Florida Atlantic
.281
2
9
.466
82
68.
Central Michigan
.516
6
5
.489
71
 
120.
Massachusetts
.279
2
9
.464
84
69.
Connecticut
.516
6
5
.488
73
 
121.
Hawaii
.257
2
10
.446
92
70.
Vanderbilt
.509
4
7
.591
11
 
122.
North Texas
.246
1
10
.489
72
71.
Duke
.509
6
5
.481
76
 
123.
Charlotte
.241
2
9
.415
109
72.
Kentucky
.507
5
6
.534
48
 
124.
Army
.233
2
9
.404
114
73.
Western Michigan
.501
6
5
.474
79
 
125.
LA Monroe
.221
1
10
.454
87
74.
East Carolina
.498
5
6
.525
58
 
126.
Wyoming
.207
1
10
.433
96
75.
Ohio
.491
7
4
.410
111
 
127.
Central Florida
.206
0
11
.509
68
76.
Virginia Tech
.491
5
6
.519
62
 
128.
Eastern Michigan
.198
1
10
.420
104
77.
Boise State
.485
7
4
.404
115
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2015 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved