Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Four Unbeatens Claim the Top 4 Spots

Four Is Enough

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • The four most successful teams to date have been undefeated Iowa, Clemson, Oklahoma State, and Ohio State—if the season ended today, they’re the teams that would deserve to be invited to the playoff
  • (9-0) Iowa has beaten 2 current top-25 teams on the road and claims the top spot by a narrow margin over (9-0) Clemson, which has played both of its current top-30 foes at home
  • Undefeated Oklahoma State vaults from #13 to #3 after handing TCU its first loss
  • #5 Notre Dame, which lost at #2 Clemson and has 3 wins versus the current top-25, has been the most successful 1-loss team to date
  • (8-1) Stanford cracks the top-10 for the first time this season, at #9
  • (7-1) Navy, whose only loss is at #5 Notre Dame, moves to #16
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 9

Nov. 2 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings
Oct. 19 Rankings
Oct. 12 Rankings

Final 2014-15 Rankings
Final '14 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Iowa
.827
9
0
.545
42
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Clemson
.824
9
0
.539
45
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Oklahoma St.
.809
9
0
.515
60
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.804
9
0
.506
66
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Notre Dame
.801
8
1
.594
11
0-1
3-0
0
6.
Alabama
.800
8
1
.592
14
1-0
1-0
1
7.
LSU
.796
7
1
.597
9
1-1
1-0
0
8.
Florida
.784
8
1
.569
30
0-1
0-0
0
9.
Stanford
.783
8
1
.567
31
0-0
2-1
0
10.
Utah
.780
8
1
.563
33
0-0
1-1
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Michigan State
.774
8
1
.554
37
  Southeastern
.644
36
6
.420
12. Baylor
.760
8
0
.442
98
  Big Ten
.632
42
13
.471
13. Oklahoma
.757
8
1
.530
51
  Big 12
.596
23
7
.431
14. TCU
.754
8
1
.528
53
  Pac-12
.587
28
8
.415
15. Michigan
.743
7
2
.591
16
  Atlantic Coast
.549
33
16
.444
16. Navy
.738
7
1
.516
56
  American Athletic
.512
27
19
.460
17. Memphis
.737
8
1
.505
68
  Mid-American
.438
21
30
.491
18. Northwestern
.735
7
2
.581
20
  Mountain West
.408
18
28
.472
19. Houston
.734
9
0
.408
113
  Conference USA
.392
20
29
.446
20. UCLA
.710
7
2
.550
39
  Sun Belt
.377
14
28
.476
21. USC
.707
6
3
.617
3
  *non-conference play
22. Mississippi State
.697
7
2
.535
48
 
23. Temple
.695
8
1
.453
90
 
24. North Carolina
.690
8
1
.447
95
 
25. Wisconsin
.689
8
2
.510
64
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Texas A&M
.687
6
3
.594
10
 
78.
Vanderbilt
.480
3
6
.581
21
27.
BYU
.685
7
2
.521
54
 
79.
Southern Miss
.480
6
3
.381
125
28.
Mississippi
.679
7
3
.565
32
 
80.
Georgia Tech
.478
3
6
.578
23
29.
Florida State
.672
7
2
.506
67
 
81.
Connecticut
.469
5
5
.469
80
30.
Penn State
.670
7
3
.555
36
 
82.
Buffalo
.466
5
4
.433
102
31.
Toledo
.665
7
1
.430
106
 
83.
Ohio
.466
5
4
.433
103
32.
Tennessee
.653
5
4
.622
2
 
84.
Utah State
.463
5
4
.430
105
33.
Bowling Green
.645
7
2
.476
75
 
85.
Maryland
.462
2
7
.632
1
34.
Georgia
.644
6
3
.547
40
 
86.
Virginia
.461
3
6
.562
34
35.
Oregon
.637
6
3
.539
44
 
87.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.453
4
5
.487
72
36.
Western Kentucky
.635
8
2
.450
94
 
88.
Colorado
.433
4
6
.493
70
37.
Pittsburgh
.627
6
3
.528
52
 
89.
Syracuse
.432
3
6
.533
49
38.
California
.624
5
4
.593
12
 
90.
Akron
.420
4
5
.453
91
39.
Arkansas
.621
5
4
.589
17
 
91.
Nevada
.418
5
4
.386
124
40.
Auburn
.621
5
4
.589
18
 
92.
South Alabama
.411
4
4
.411
112
41.
Miami, Fla.
.615
6
3
.516
58
 
93.
San Jose State
.411
4
5
.444
97
42.
Washington State
.611
6
3
.512
63
 
94.
New Mexico
.409
5
4
.377
126
43.
West Virginia
.603
4
4
.603
6
 
95.
Oregon State
.407
2
7
.579
22
44.
Texas
.578
4
5
.610
4
 
96.
Rice
.396
4
5
.428
107
45.
Boise State
.578
7
2
.406
114
 
97.
LA Lafayette
.387
4
4
.387
122
46.
Duke
.573
6
3
.472
78
 
98.
Purdue
.380
2
7
.551
38
47.
Illinois
.570
5
4
.537
47
 
99.
Wake Forest
.380
3
6
.479
73
48.
Texas Tech
.569
5
5
.569
28
 
100.
Boston College
.378
3
7
.498
69
49.
Louisville
.564
5
4
.531
50
 
101.
Colorado State
.373
4
5
.405
115
50.
Appalachian St.
.562
7
2
.391
119
 
102.
Tulane
.368
2
7
.538
46
51.
Washington
.559
4
5
.592
13
 
103.
Idaho
.365
3
6
.463
83
52.
Western Michigan
.559
6
3
.458
89
 
104.
Kent State
.363
3
6
.461
86
53.
Cincinnati
.549
5
4
.516
59
 
105.
UNLV
.362
3
6
.460
87
54.
N.C. State
.546
6
3
.445
96
 
106.
Fla. International
.360
5
5
.360
127
55.
Arizona State
.545
4
5
.578
24
 
107.
UTEP
.360
4
5
.391
120
56.
Marshall
.542
8
2
.358
128
 
108.
Old Dominion
.357
4
5
.389
121
57.
Minnesota
.542
4
5
.575
26
 
109.
Ball State
.347
3
7
.464
82
58.
South Florida
.541
5
4
.507
65
 
110.
Troy
.337
3
6
.432
104
59.
Arkansas State
.540
6
3
.439
100
 
111.
Georgia State
.314
2
6
.459
88
60.
Georgia Southern
.539
6
2
.386
123
 
112.
Fresno State
.310
2
7
.474
76
61.
Kentucky
.537
4
5
.570
27
 
113.
Texas State
.307
2
6
.452
92
62.
Louisiana Tech
.537
7
3
.415
111
 
114.
SMU
.301
1
8
.542
43
63.
Indiana
.536
4
5
.569
29
 
115.
Hawaii
.301
2
8
.478
74
64.
Nebraska
.527
4
6
.586
19
 
116.
Florida Atlantic
.291
2
7
.451
93
65.
Central Michigan
.526
5
4
.492
71
 
117.
Miami, Ohio
.287
2
8
.461
84
66.
Missouri
.523
4
5
.556
35
 
118.
New Mexico State
.280
2
7
.438
101
67.
San Diego State
.522
6
3
.422
109
 
119.
Kansas
.278
0
9
.606
5
68.
Northern Illinois
.519
6
3
.419
110
 
120.
Massachusetts
.278
1
8
.514
61
69.
Arizona
.516
5
5
.516
57
 
121.
Army
.253
2
7
.404
116
70.
Tulsa
.507
5
4
.473
77
 
122.
Charlotte
.253
2
7
.404
117
71.
Kansas State
.501
3
5
.576
25
 
123.
LA Monroe
.244
1
8
.471
79
72.
South Carolina
.500
3
6
.600
7
 
124.
UTSA
.241
1
8
.467
81
73.
Air Force
.499
6
3
.399
118
 
125.
North Texas
.237
1
8
.461
85
74.
Iowa State
.498
3
6
.598
8
 
126.
Eastern Michigan
.217
1
9
.441
99
75.
Rutgers
.491
3
6
.592
15
 
127.
Central Florida
.213
0
10
.521
55
76.
East Carolina
.485
4
6
.545
41
 
128.
Wyoming
.205
1
9
.423
108
77.
Virginia Tech
.480
4
5
.513
62
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2015 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved