Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

LSU Remains #1

Four Is Enough

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • Iowa moves to #2
  • The Big Ten holds 3 of the top-5 spots
  • There’s a huge gap (.034) between #17 Baylor and #18 Michigan—indeed, Baylor is closer to cracking the top-10 than to falling one spot, while Michigan is closer to falling out of the top-25 than to rising one spot
  • The Pac-12’s parity is remarkable—no Pac-12 team is in the top-10, but three-quarters of its teams are in the top-55
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 26

Oct. 19 Rankings
Oct. 12 Rankings

Final 2014-15 Rankings
Final '14 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
LSU
.836
7
0
.561
28
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Iowa
.833
7
0
.555
31
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Michigan State
.825
8
0
.541
38
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Clemson
.816
7
0
.526
50
1-0
0-0
0
5.
Ohio State
.804
8
0
.506
60
0-0
0-0
0
6.
TCU
.798
7
0
.497
65
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Memphis
.796
7
0
.494
68
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Alabama
.782
7
1
.576
16
0-0
1-0
1
9.
Oklahoma St.
.780
7
0
.470
85
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Notre Dame
.778
6
1
.583
13
0-1
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Florida
.777
6
1
.582
14
  Southeastern
.647
34
5
.412
12. Utah
.776
6
1
.581
15
  Big Ten
.634
42
13
.473
13. Temple
.768
7
0
.453
94
  Big 12
.603
23
7
.439
14. Oklahoma
.767
6
1
.569
21
  Pac-12
.601
28
8
.429
15. Stanford
.757
6
1
.555
32
  Atlantic Coast
.552
33
15
.438
16. Toledo
.754
7
0
.434
103
  American Athletic
.513
26
18
.458
17. Baylor
.753
7
0
.433
104
  Mid-American
.445
21
30
.498
18. Michigan
.719
5
2
.602
5
  Mountain West
.406
17
27
.473
19. Texas A&M
.715
5
2
.597
7
  Conference USA
.389
19
28
.445
20. Houston
.714
7
0
.384
124
  Sun Belt
.373
14
28
.471
21. Northwestern
.712
6
2
.571
19
  *non-conference play
22. Florida State
.709
6
1
.494
69
 
23. UCLA
.709
5
2
.590
11
 
24. Pittsburgh
.705
6
1
.489
72
 
25. California
.692
5
2
.570
20
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Mississippi
.687
6
2
.541
37
 
78.
Syracuse
.480
3
4
.523
54
27.
Penn State
.685
6
2
.540
39
 
79.
Southern Miss
.475
5
3
.401
117
28.
Mississippi State
.683
6
2
.537
42
 
80.
Air Force
.475
4
3
.432
105
29.
BYU
.675
6
2
.528
48
 
81.
Rice
.471
4
3
.428
109
30.
Navy
.673
5
1
.469
86
 
82.
Northern Illinois
.466
5
3
.392
123
31.
Duke
.668
6
1
.445
97
 
83.
Iowa State
.464
2
5
.595
8
32.
USC
.655
4
3
.615
4
 
84.
Maryland
.462
2
5
.592
9
33.
North Carolina
.655
6
1
.431
106
 
85.
Virginia Tech
.458
3
5
.533
43
34.
Wisconsin
.651
6
2
.501
63
 
86.
Colorado
.453
4
4
.453
95
35.
Georgia
.643
5
2
.516
58
 
87.
Virginia
.437
2
5
.568
22
36.
Bowling Green
.635
6
2
.483
73
 
88.
Akron
.430
3
4
.473
84
37.
Texas
.631
3
4
.670
1
 
89.
Boston College
.423
3
5
.498
64
38.
Western Kentucky
.628
6
2
.476
80
 
90.
Buffalo
.410
3
4
.453
96
39.
Appalachian St.
.618
6
1
.393
122
 
91.
Kent State
.409
3
5
.483
74
40.
Auburn
.610
4
3
.568
23
 
92.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.406
3
5
.481
79
41.
Washington State
.605
5
2
.475
81
 
93.
Oregon State
.403
2
5
.533
44
42.
Texas Tech
.602
5
3
.528
46
 
94.
Tulane
.403
2
5
.533
45
43.
Arizona State
.590
4
3
.548
35
 
95.
San Jose State
.401
4
4
.401
118
44.
Tennessee
.589
3
4
.630
2
 
96.
Wake Forest
.399
3
5
.473
83
45.
Marshall
.587
7
1
.350
128
 
97.
Nevada
.398
4
4
.398
120
46.
Kentucky
.586
4
3
.544
36
 
98.
Colorado State
.394
3
4
.435
102
47.
Arkansas
.584
3
4
.625
3
 
99.
Connecticut
.394
3
5
.467
87
48.
Boise State
.574
6
2
.420
113
 
100.
Idaho
.388
3
4
.429
107
49.
Minnesota
.568
4
3
.525
51
 
101.
Fla. International
.382
4
4
.382
125
50.
West Virginia
.567
3
3
.567
26
 
102.
South Alabama
.379
3
4
.420
112
51.
Oregon
.565
4
3
.523
53
 
103.
Georgia State
.375
2
4
.474
82
52.
Arizona
.565
5
3
.490
71
 
104.
New Mexico
.367
4
4
.367
127
53.
Illinois
.563
4
3
.520
55
 
105.
Texas State
.358
2
4
.455
93
54.
Cincinnati
.561
4
3
.519
56
 
106.
Old Dominion
.357
3
4
.397
121
55.
Indiana
.560
4
4
.560
29
 
107.
Massachusetts
.350
1
6
.574
17
56.
Western Michigan
.555
4
3
.512
59
 
108.
LA Lafayette
.348
2
4
.445
99
57.
East Carolina
.551
4
4
.551
34
 
109.
Fresno State
.334
2
6
.482
75
58.
Miami, Fla.
.546
4
3
.503
62
 
110.
Hawaii
.334
2
6
.482
76
59.
South Carolina
.543
3
4
.585
12
 
111.
Ball State
.333
2
6
.481
78
60.
Missouri
.538
4
4
.538
41
 
112.
UTEP
.333
3
4
.372
126
61.
Georgia Southern
.537
5
2
.407
115
 
113.
UNLV
.332
2
5
.457
92
62.
N.C. State
.531
5
2
.401
116
 
114.
Purdue
.332
1
6
.554
33
63.
Rutgers
.528
3
4
.571
18
 
115.
SMU
.309
1
6
.528
47
64.
Georgia Tech
.527
3
5
.602
6
 
116.
Troy
.304
2
5
.425
110
65.
Kansas State
.525
3
4
.568
24
 
117.
LA Monroe
.299
1
6
.517
57
66.
South Florida
.524
4
3
.482
77
 
118.
UTSA
.288
1
6
.503
61
67.
Washington
.524
3
4
.567
27
 
119.
Charlotte
.283
2
5
.401
119
68.
San Diego State
.521
5
3
.445
98
 
120.
Army
.276
2
6
.414
114
69.
Louisiana Tech
.514
5
3
.439
100
 
121.
Miami, Ohio
.269
1
7
.493
70
70.
Louisville
.514
3
4
.556
30
 
122.
Kansas
.266
0
7
.592
10
71.
Utah State
.506
4
3
.463
90
 
123.
Eastern Michigan
.248
1
7
.465
89
72.
Arkansas State
.500
4
3
.457
91
 
124.
Florida Atlantic
.237
1
6
.438
101
73.
Vanderbilt
.496
3
4
.539
40
 
125.
Wyoming
.222
1
7
.429
108
74.
Ohio
.496
5
3
.421
111
 
126.
Central Florida
.216
0
8
.525
52
75.
Central Michigan
.494
4
4
.494
67
 
127.
North Texas
.197
0
7
.495
66
76.
Nebraska
.492
3
5
.567
25
 
128.
New Mexico State
.179
0
7
.467
88
77.
Tulsa
.485
3
4
.528
49
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2015 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved