Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The First Rankings of the 2020 Season

  • Ninety-seven teams have played the minimim 4 games necessary to qualify for the rankings in 2020
  • Each of the top 5 teams plays in a different conference: the SEC, ACC, Big Ten, American, and Sun Belt
  • Undefeated Alabama, with wins over #11 Texas A&M and #13 Georgia, premiers at #1
  • (8-0) Coastal Carolina, which went on the road and handed #17 (7-1) Louisiana its only loss, cracks the top-5 based on its success to date
  • Of the 5 conferences that have played enough non-conference games to qualify for the conference rankings (which are based on non-conference play), the ACC is the top conference to date, followed by the American Athletic Conference and Big 12
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 23

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.843
7
0
.572
35
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Notre Dame
.838
8
0
.564
41
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Northwestern
.836
5
0
.560
43
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Cincinnati
.809
8
0
.515
57
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Coast. Carolina
.809
8
0
.514
59
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Miami, Fla.
.808
7
1
.614
20
0-1
1-0
0
7.
Ohio State
.804
4
0
.506
61
0-0
1-0
0
8.
Clemson
.803
7
1
.608
22
1-1
2-0
0
9.
BYU
.792
9
0
.488
68
0-0
1-0
0
10.
Florida
.780
6
1
.586
30
0-0
1-1
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Texas A&M
.766
5
1
.583
31
  Atlantic Coast
.580
11
3
.403
12.
Marshall
.759
7
0
.440
86
  American Athletic
.568
12
6
.467
13.
Georgia
.752
5
2
.642
7
  Big 12
.523
5
3
.448
14.
North Carolina
.749
6
2
.616
19
  Sun Belt
.462
14
14
.462
15.
San Jose State
.746
4
0
.423
90
  Conference USA
.425
16
19
.451
16.
N.C. State
.741
6
3
.656
3
  Pac-12
N/A
0
0
N/A
17.
Louisiana 
.741
7
1
.520
55
  Southeastern
N/A
0
0
N/A
18.
Tulsa
.731
5
1
.537
48
  Big Ten
N/A
0
0
N/A
19.
Nevada
.711
5
0
.380
95
  Mountain West
N/A
1
1
N/A
20.
Indiana
.694
4
1
.516
56
  Mid-American
N/A
0
0
N/A
21.
Auburn
.690
5
2
.568
37
  *non-conference play
22.
Boise State
.678
4
1
.497
64
 
23.
Wake Forest
.659
4
3
.619
16
 
24.
SMU
.659
7
2
.491
65
 
25.
Boston College
.656
5
4
.625
15
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Florida Atlantic
.651
5
1
.445
83
 
79.
East Carolina
.393
2
6
.546
45
27.
Pittsburgh
.643
5
4
.612
21
 
80.
Syracuse
.392
1
8
.639
10
28.
Oklahoma State
.642
5
2
.515
58
 
81.
North Texas
.377
3
3
.377
97
29.
Iowa
.638
3
2
.580
34
 
82.
Texas Tech
.370
3
5
.443
84
30.
Virginia Tech
.637
4
5
.667
1
 
83.
UTEP
.350
3
4
.391
93
31.
UCF
.637
5
3
.564
39
 
84.
Texas State
.349
2
9
.545
46
32.
Virginia
.636
4
4
.636
11
 
85.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.342
3
6
.438
87
33.
Purdue
.634
2
2
.634
12
 
86.
South Florida
.329
1
7
.564
40
34.
Liberty
.627
8
1
.380
96
 
87.
Penn State
.317
0
5
.650
5
35.
Memphis
.618
5
2
.488
67
 
88.
Temple
.309
1
6
.528
51
36.
Missouri
.617
3
3
.617
18
 
89.
Southern Miss
.273
2
7
.429
89
37.
Iowa State
.617
6
2
.464
75
 
90.
Vanderbilt
.267
0
7
.594
27
38.
Appalachian St.
.616
6
2
.463
76
 
91.
Baylor
.256
1
5
.445
81
39.
Houston
.598
3
3
.598
26
 
92.
UNLV
.245
0
4
.565
38
40.
Oklahoma
.594
6
2
.441
85
 
93.
New Mexico
.243
0
4
.562
42
41.
Army
.570
7
2
.399
91
 
94.
Utah State
.237
0
4
.554
44
42.
Arkansas
.569
3
5
.641
8
 
95.
Kansas
.223
0
7
.535
49
43.
Texas
.568
5
2
.437
88
 
96.
LA Monroe
.193
0
8
.490
66
44.
UAB
.566
4
3
.524
53
 
97.
Fla. International
.167
0
5
.445
80
45.
Mississippi
.562
3
4
.603
24
 
98.
46.
Georgia Southern
.548
6
3
.447
79
 
99.
47.
San Diego State
.537
3
2
.476
72
 
100.
48.
Fresno State
.536
3
1
.384
94
 
101.
49.
LSU
.532
3
3
.532
50
 
102.
50.
Kentucky
.532
3
5
.606
23
 
103.
51.
Minnesota
.530
2
3
.590
29
 
104.
52.
Louisville
.527
3
6
.626
14
 
105.
53.
Louisiana Tech
.525
4
3
.482
69
 
106.
54.
Air Force
.525
2
2
.525
52
 
107.
55.
Tennessee
.523
2
5
.650
4
 
108.
56.
Illinois
.522
2
3
.581
32
 
109.
57.
Michigan
.521
2
3
.580
33
 
110.
58.
UTSA
.517
6
4
.457
78
 
111.
59.
Duke
.515
2
6
.664
2
 
112.
60.
Georgia Tech
.513
2
5
.641
9
 
113.
61.
Tulane
.511
5
5
.511
60
 
114.
62.
Navy
.501
3
4
.543
47
 
115.
63.
Georgia State
.498
4
4
.498
63
 
116.
64.
Florida State
.491
2
6
.642
6
 
117.
65.
Mississippi State
.490
2
5
.619
17
 
118.
66.
Nebraska
.476
1
3
.628
13
 
119.
67.
West Virginia
.472
5
3
.398
92
 
120.
68.
Kansas State
.468
4
4
.468
74
 
121.
69.
South Carolina
.446
2
6
.600
25
 
122.
70.
Troy
.445
4
4
.445
82
 
123.
71.
TCU
.426
3
4
.469
73
 
124.
72.
Western Kentucky
.422
4
6
.482
70
 
125.
73.
Charlotte
.422
2
3
.482
71
 
126.
74.
Arkansas State
.420
3
6
.521
54
 
127.
75.
Michigan State
.418
1
3
.571
36
 
128.
76.
Rutgers
.404
1
4
.590
28
 
129.
77.
Hawaii
.401
2
3
.460
77
 
130.
78.
South Alabama
.400
3
6
.500
62
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s sixth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2020 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved